Clinicians and laypeople assessment of facial attractiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate treated with LeFort I surgery or late maxillary protraction

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 77, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1446-1450

  Chung, Eun Hee ^a   Borzabadi Farahani, Ali ^a,b   Yen, Stephen L K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Class III malocclusion; Cleft lip and palate; Facial attractiveness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LATE MAXILLARY PROTRACTION; LEFORT I SURGERY; MALE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

CLASS III MALOCCLUSION; CLEFT LIP AND PALATE; FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICIANS;

EID: 84882656130     PISSN: 01655876     EISSN: 18728464     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.05.042     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Trotman C.A., Faraway J.J., Phillips C., van Aalst J. Effects of lip revision surgery in cleft lip/palate patients. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89:728-732.
2. Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 1991, 28:1-21.
3. Cox N.H., van der Linden F.P. Facial harmony. Am. J. Orthod. 1971, 60:175-183.
4. Foster E.J. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod. 1973, 43:34-40.
5. Romani K.L., Agahi F., Nanda R., Zernik J.H. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod. 1993, 63:175-182.
6. Baldwin D.C. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 1980, 8:244-256.
7. Laufer D., Glick D., Gutman D., Sharon A. Patient motivation and response to surgical correction of prognathism. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1976, 41:309-313.
8. Jacobson A. Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 1984, 54:18-35.
9. Flanary C.M., Barnwell G.M., Alexander J.M. Patient perceptions of orthognathic surgery. Am. J. Orthod. 1985, 88:137-145.
10. Mayo K.H., Dryland-Vig K.W.L., Vig P.S., Kowalski C.J. Attitude variables of dentofacial deformity patients: demographic characteristics and associations. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1991, 49:594-602.
11. Howells D.J., Shaw W.C. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am. J. Orthod. 1985, 88:402-408.
12. Maple J.R., Vig K.W., Beck F.M., Larsen P.E., Shanker S. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2005, 128:690-696.
13. Eisenthal Y., Dror G., Ruppin E. Learning facial attractiveness. Neural Comput. 2006, 18:119-142.
14. Dunlevy H.A., White R.P., Proffit W.R., Turvey T.A. Professional and lay judgment of facial esthetic changes following orthognathic surgery. Int. J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg. 1987, 1:151-158.
15. Kerr W.J.S., O'Donnell J.M. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br. J. Orthod. 1990, 17:299-304.
16. Prahl-Andersen B., Boersma H., van der Linden F.P.G.M., Moore A.W. Perceptions of dento-facial morphology by lay persons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1979, 98:209-212.
17. Cochrane S.M., Cunningham S.J., Hunt N.P. A comparison of the perception of facial profiles by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int. J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg. 1999, 14:291-295.
18. Liu Y., Korn E.L., Oh H.S., Pearson H., Xu T.M., Baumrind S. Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' evaluations of "facial attractiveness" from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2009, 135:621-634.
19. Mani M.R., Semb G., Andlin-Sobocki A. Nasolabial appearance in adults with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: relation between professional and lay rating and patients' satisfaction. J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg. 2010, 44:191-198.
20. Liou E.J., Tsai W.C. A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2005, 42:121-127.
21. Yen S.L. Protocols for late maxillary protraction in cleft lip and palate patients at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles. Semin. Orthod. 2011, 17:138-148.
22. Borzabadi-Farahani A., Lane C.J., Yen S.L. Late maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, a preliminary study. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2012, 10.1597/12-099.
23. Devcic Z., Karmini K., Popenko N., Wong B.J.F. A web-based method for rating facial attractiveness. Laryngoscope 2010, 120:902-906.
24. Ritter K., Trotman C.A., Phillips C. Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2002, 39:587-596.
25. Fudalej P., Katsaros C., Bongaarts C., Dudkiewicz Z., Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M. Nasolabial aesthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1- versus 3-stage treatment protocols. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009, 67:1661-1666.
26. Nollet P.J., Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M., Chatzigianni A., Semb G., Shaw W.C., Bronkhorst E.M., et al. Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2007, 35:278-286.
27. Paiva T.S., Andre M. Evaluating aesthetics of the nasolabial region in children with cleft lip and palate: professional analysis and patient satisfaction. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2012, 6:781-787.
28. Richman L.C. Facial and speech relationships to behavior of children with clefts across three age levels. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 1997, 34:390-395.
29. Richman L.C., Millard T. Brief report: cleft lip and palate: longitudinal behavior and relationships of cleft conditions to behavior and achievement. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 1997, 22:487-494.
30. Khattak Z.G., Benington P.C., Khambay B.S., Green L., Walker F., Ayoub A.F. An assessment of the quality of care provided to orthognathic surgery patients through a multidisciplinary clinic. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2012, 40:243-247.
31. Rustemeyer J., Gregersen J. Quality of life in orthognathic surgery patients: postsurgical improvements in aesthetics and self-confidence. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2012, 40:400-404.
32. Gkantidis N., Papamanou D.A., Christou P., Topouzelis N. Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2012, 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.034.
33. Modarai F., Donaldson J.C., Naini F.B. The influence of lower lip position on the perceived attractiveness of chin prominence. Angle Orthod. 2013, 10.2319/122912-974.1.
34. Broder H.L., Smith F.B., Strauss R.P. Effects of visible and invisible orofacial defects on self-perception and adjustment across developmental eras and gender. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 1994, 31:429-436.
35. Hunt O., Burden D., Hepper P., Stevenson M., Johnston C. Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2006, 43:598-605.
36. Noor S.N., Musa S. Assessment of patients' level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2007, 44:292-303.
37. Sinko K., Jagsch R., Prechtl V., Watzinger F., Hollmann K., Baumann A. Evaluation of aesthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2005, 42:355-361.
38. Russell K.A., Tompson B. Correlation between facial morphology and aesthetics in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2009, 46:319-325.
39. Czarnecki S.T., Nanda R.S., Currier G.F. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 1993, 104:180-187.
40. Brattström V., Mølsted K., Prahl-Andersen B., Semb G., Shaw W.C. The Eurocleft study: interceanter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: Craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 2005, 42:69-77.
41. Offert B., Janiszewska-Olszowska J., Dudkiewicz Z., Brudnicki A., Katsaros C., Fudalej P.S. Facial esthetics in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate 3 years after alveolar bonegrafting combined with rhinoplasty between 2 and 4 years of age. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2013, 16:36-43.
42. Asher-McDade C., Brattström V., Dahl E., McWilliam J., Mølsted K., Plint D.A., et al. The RP. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 1992, 29:409-412.
43. Papamanou D.A., Gkantidis N., Topouzelis N., Christou P. Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople. Eur. J. Orthod. 2012, 34:553-560.