Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men's faces

Evolution and Human Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 260-267

  Stephen, Ian D ^a   Scott, Isabel M L ^b   Coetzee, Vinet ^c   Pound, Nicholas ^d   Perrett, David I ^e   Penton Voak, Ian S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MALAYSIA CAMPUS   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^d BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attractiveness; Color; Face; Health; Masculinity; Perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862486799     PISSN: 10905138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adamo S.A., Spiteri R.J. Female choice for male immunocompetence: when is it worth it?. Behavioral Ecology 2005, 16:871-879.
2. Adamo S.A., Spiteri R.J. He's healthy, but will he survive the plague? Possible constraints on mate choice for disease resistance. Animal Behaviour 2009, 77:67-78.
3. Brooks R., Scott I.M., Makalov A.A., Kasumovic M.M., Clark A.P., Penton-Voak I.S. National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinised faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 2010, (in press). 10.1098/rspb.2010.0964.
4. Brown W.M., Price M.E., Kang J., Pound N., Zhao Y., Yu H. Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105:12938-12943.
5. Bulygina E., Mitteroecker P., Aiello L. Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2006, 131:432-443.
6. Central Intelligence Agency The world factbook 2009, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed November 16, 2011.
7. Cunningham M.R., Barbee A.P., Pike C.L. What do women want-facial metric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:61-72.
8. DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C., Crawford J.R., Welling L.L.M., Little A.C. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2010, 277:2405-2410.
9. DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C., Little A.C., Boothroyd L.G., Perrett D.I., Penton-Voak I.S., Cooper P.A., Penke L., Feinberg D.R., Tiddeman B.P. Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2006, 273:1355-1360.
10. DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C., Little A.C., Crawford J.R., Welling L.L. Further evidence for regional variation in women's masculinity preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2011, 728:813-814.
11. Dowling D.K., Simmons L.W. Reactive oxygen species as universal constraints in life-history evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 2009, 276:1737-1745.
12. Fink B., Grammer K., Matts P.J. Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior 2006, 27(6):433-442.
13. Fink B., Grammer K., Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology 2001, 115(1):92-99.
14. Frederick D.A., Haselton M.G. Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:1167-1183.
15. Goodall C. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 1991, 53:285-339.
16. Gower J. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 1975, 40:33-51.
17. Hamilton W.D., Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?. Science 1982, 218:384-387.
18. Hill S.E., Reeve K. Mating games: the evolution of human mating transactions. Behavioural Ecology 2004, 15:748-756.
19. Hong G., Luo M.R., Rhodes P.A. A study of digital camera colorimetric characterization based on polynomial modeling. Color Research & Application 2001, 26(1):76-84.
20. Johnston V.S., Hagel R., Franklin M., Fink B., Grammer K. Male facial attractiveness: evidence of hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior 2001, 22:251-267.
21. Jones B.C., Little A.C., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception 2004, 33:569-576.
22. Jones B.C., Perrett D.I., Little A.C., Boothroyd L., Cornwell R.E., Feinberg D.R., et al. Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2005, 272:47-354.
23. Kokko H., Brooks R., Jennions M., Morley J. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc R Soc Lond B 2003, 270:653-664.
24. Komori M., Kawamura S., Ishihara S. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness. Vision Research 2009, 49:862-869.
25. Koutsos E.A., Calvert C.C., Klasing K.C. The effect of an acute phase response on tissue carotenoid levels of growing chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Comp Biochem Physiol 2003, 135A:635-646.
26. Little A.C., Cohen D., Jones B.C., Belsky J. Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 2007, 61:967-973.
27. Lozano G.A. Carotenoids, parasites, and sexual selection. Oikos 1994, 70(2):309-311.
28. Martinkauppi B. Face color under varying illumination-analysis and applications 2002, Oulu University Press, Oulu.
29. Matts P.J., Fink B., Grammer K., Burquest M. Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health and attractiveness of female facial skin. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2007, 57(6):977-984.
30. Neave N., Shields K. The effects of facial hair manipulation on female perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity and dominance in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 45:373-377.
31. O'Toole A.J., Deffenbacher K.A., Valentin D., Abdi H. Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory and Cognition 1994, 22:208-224.
32. O'Higgins P., Jones N. Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. Journal of Anatomy 1998, 193:251-272.
33. Paxton L.A., Redd S.C., Steketee R.W., Otieno J.O., Nahlen B. An evaluation of clinical indicators for severe paediatric illness. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 1996, 74:613-618.
34. Penton-Voak I.S., Jacobson A., Trivers R. Populational differences in attractiveness judgments of male and female faces: comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25(6):355-370.
35. Penton-Voak I.S., Jones B.C., Little A.C., Baker S., Tiddeman B., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2001, 268:1617-1623.
36. Penton-Voak I.S., Little A.C., Jones B.C., Burt D.M., Tiddeman B.P., Perrett D.I. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology 2003, 117(3):264-271.
37. Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior 2000, 21(1):39-48.
38. Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I. Male facial attractiveness: perceived personality and shifting female preferences for male traits across the menstrual cycle. Advances in the Study of Behavior 2001, 30:219-259.
39. Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I., Castles D.L., Kobayashi T., Burt D.M., Murray L.K., et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 1999, 399:741-742.
40. Perrett D.I., Burt D.M., Penton-Voak I.S., Lee K.J., Rowland D.A., Edwards R. Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 1999, 20(5):295-307.
41. Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 1998, 394(6696):884-887.
42. Pound N., Penton-Voak I.S., Surridge A.K. Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 2009, 276:153-159.
43. Puts D.A. Cyclic variation in women's preferences for masculine traits: Potential hormonal causes. Human Nature 2006, 17:114-127.
44. Puts D.A. Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 2010, 31:157-175.
45. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:199-226.
46. Rhodes G., Chan J., Zebrowitz L.A., Simmons L.W. Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2003, 270(0):S93-S95.
47. Rhodes G., Lee K., Palermo R., Weiss M., Yoshikawa S., Clissa P., Williams T., Peters M., Winkler C., Jeffery L. Attractiveness of own-race, other-race and mixed-race faces. Perception 2005, 34:319-340.
48. Rhodes G., Sumich A., Byatt G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?. Psychological Science 1999, 10(1):52-58.
49. Robins A. Biological perspectives on human pigmentation 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Rohlf F.J., Slice D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Biol 1990, 39:40-59.
51. Scarbrough P.S., Johnston V.S. Individual differences in women's facial preferences as a function of digit ratio and mental rotation ability. Evolution and Human Behavior 2005, 26(6):509-526.
52. Scott I.M.L., Pound N., Stephen I.D., Clark A.P., Penton-Voak I.S. Does masculinity matter? The contribution of sex-typical appearance to male attractiveness in humans. PLoS one 2010.
53. Scott I.M.L., Swami V., Josephson S.C., Penton-Voak I.S. Context-dependent preferences for facial dimorphism in a rural Malaysian population. Evolution and Human Behavior 2008, 29:289-296.
54. Shepherd J.W., Deregowski J.B. Races and faces: a comparison of the responses of Africans and Europeans to faces of the same and different races. British Journal of Psychology 1981, 20:125-133.
55. Stahl W., Heinrich U., Jungmann H., von Laar J., Schietzel M., et al. Increased dermal carotenoid levels assessed by noninvasive reflection spectrophotometry correlate with serum levels in women ingesting Betatene. Journal of Nutrition 1998, 128:903-907.
56. Stephan C.N., Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I., Tiddeman B.P., Clement J.G., Henneberg M. Two-dimensional computer generated average human face morphology and facial approximation. Computer graphic facial reconstruction 2005, Elsevier Science, Oxford. M. Marks, J. Clement (Eds.).
57. Stephen I.D., Coetzee V., Law Smith M.J., Perrett D.I. Skin blood perfusion and oxygenation color affect perceived human health. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5083.
58. Stephen I.D., Coetzee V., Perrett D.I. Carotenoid and melanin pigment coloration affect perceived human health. Evolution & Human Behavior 2011.
59. Stephen I.D., Law Smith M.J., Stirrat M.R., Perrett D.I. Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces. International Journal of Primatol 2009, 30:845-857.
60. Stephen I.D., McKeegan A.M. Lip color affects perceived sex typicality and attractiveness of human faces. Perception 2010.
61. Tiddeman B., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2001, 21:42-50.
62. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1991, 43A:161-204.
63. Wilcox A.J., Dunson D., Baird D.D. The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. British Medical Journal 2000, 321:1259.
64. Zihlman A.L., MacFarland R.K. Body mass in lowland gorillas: a quantitative analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2000, 113:61-78.