Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: Signal amplification and accurate adaptation

Annual Review of Biophysics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 337-359

  Tu, Yuhai ^a  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

adaptation; bacterial chemotaxis; gradient sensing; modeling; receptor clustering; signal amplification

Indexed keywords

RECEPTOR;

ACCURACY; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; CHEMORECEPTOR; CHEMOTAXIS; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMAN; LIGAND BINDING; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHYLATION; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHASE TRANSITION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TEMPERATURE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CHEMOTAXIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84877782979     PISSN: 1936122X     EISSN: 19361238     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130358     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adler J,TsoWW.1976. Decision-making in bacteria: Chemotactic response of E. coli to conflicting stimuli. Science 184:1292-944
2. Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S. 1999. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397:168-711
3. Ames P, Studdert CA, Reiser RH, Parkinson JS. 2002. Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in E. coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(10):7060-655
4. Barkai N, Leibler S. 1997. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387:913-177
5. Berg HC, BrownDA. 1972. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239(5374):500-44
6. Block SM, Segall JE, Berg HC. 1982. Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 83:215-266
7. Block SM, Segall JE, Berg HC. 1983. Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Bacteriol. 154:312- 233
8. Bray D, Levin MD,Morton-Firth CJ. 1998. Receptor clustering as a cellularmechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393:85-888
9. Briegel A, Li X, Bilwes AM, Hughes KT, Jensen GJ, Crane BR. 2012. Bacterial chemoreceptor arrays are hexagonally packed trimers of receptor dimers networked by rings of kinase and coupling proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:3766-711
10. Briegel A, Ortega DR, Tocheva EI, Wuichet K, Li Z, et al. 2009. Universal architecture of bacterial chemoreceptor arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(40):17181-866
11. Brown DA, Berg HC. 1974. Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:1388-922
12. Changeux JP, Edelstein SJ. 2005. Allosteric mechanisms of signal transduction. Science 308:1424-288
13. Duke TAJ, Bray D. 1999. Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane of receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10104-88
14. Endres RG, Wingreen NS. 2006. Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through "assistance neighborhoods". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(35):13040-444
15. Hamadeh A, RobertsMA, August E,McSharry PE,Maini PK, et al. 2011. Feedback control architecture and the bacterial chemotaxis network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7(5):e10011300
16. Hazelbauer GL, Falke JJ, Parkinson JS. 2008. Bacterial chemoreceptors: High-performance signaling in networked arrays. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33(1):9-199
17. Jiang L, Ouyang Q, Tu Y. 2009. A mechanism for precision-sensing via a gradient-sensing pathway: A model of Escherichia coli thermotaxis. Biophys. J. 97:74-822
18. Kalinin YV, Jiang L, Tu Y, Wu M. 2009. Logarithmic sensing in Escherichia coli bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 96(6):2439-488
19. Keymer JE, Endres RG, Skoge M, Meir Y, Wingreen NS. 2006. Chemosensing in E. coli: Two regimes in two-state receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:1786-911
20. Khursigara CM, Lan G, Neumann S,Wu X, Ravindran S, et al. 2011. Lateral density of receptor arrays in the membrane plane influences sensitivity of the E. coli chemotaxis response. EMBO J. 30(9):1719-299
21. Khursigara CM,Wu X, Zhang P, Lefman J, Subramaniam S. 2008. Role ofHAMPdomains in chemotaxis signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(43):16555-600
22. Kollmann M, Lovdok L, Bartholoḿe K, Timmer J, Sourjik V. 2005. Design principles of a bacterial signalling network. Nature 438:504-77
23. Lazova MD, Ahmed T, Bellomo D, Stocker R, Shimizu TS. 2011. Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(33):13870-755
24. Lan G, Schulmeister S, Sourjik V, Tu Y. 2011. Adapt locally and act globally: Strategy to maintain high chemoreceptor sensitivity in complex environments. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7:4755
25. Li M, Hazelbauer GL. 2004. Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex. J. Bacteriol. 186:3687-944
26. Maddock JR, Shapiro L. 1993. Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the E. coli cell. Science 259:1717-233
27. Maeda K, Imae Y. 1979. Thermosensory transduction in Escherichia coli: Inhibition of the thermoresponse by L-serine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76(1):91-955
28. Meir Y, Jakovljevic V, Oleksiuk O, Sourjik V, Wingreen NS. 2011. Precision and kinetics of adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 99:2766-744
29. Mello BA, Shaw L,Tu Y. 2004. Effects of receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 87(3):1578- 955
30. Mello BA, Tu Y. 2003. Perfect and near perfect adaptation in a model of bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 84(5):2943-566
31. Mello BA, Tu Y. 2003. Quantitative modeling of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis: The role of coupling among different chemoreceptor species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(14):8223-288
32. Mello BA,Tu Y. 2005. An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: Understanding bacterial chemotaxis response to multiple stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(48):17354-599
33. Mello BA, Tu Y. 2007. Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for E. coli chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 92(4):2329-377
34. Mesibov R, Ordal GW, Adler J. 1973. The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. J. Gen. Physiol. 62:203-233
35. Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux JP. 1965. On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12:88-1188
36. Morton-Firth CJ, Simizu TS,BrayD. 1999.Afree-energy-based stochastic simulation of the TarReceptor complex. J. Mol. Biol. 286:1059-744
37. Oleksiuk O, Jakovljevic V, Vladimirov N, Carvalho R, Paster E, et al. 2011. Thermal robustness of signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 145(2):312-211
38. Paster E, Ryu WS. 2008. The thermal impulse response of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:5373-777
39. Rao CV, Frenklach M, Arkin AP. 2004. An allosteric model for transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Mol. Biol. 343:291-3033
40. RaoCV, Glekas GD, OrdalGW. 2008. The three adaptation systems of Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis. Trends Microbiol. 16(10):480-877
41. Sanders DA, Koshland DE Jr. 1988. Receptor interactions through phosphorylation and methylation pathways in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85(22):8425-299
42. Shimizu TS, Delalez N, Pichler K, Berg HC. 2006. Monitoring bacterial chemotaxis by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer: Absence of feedback from the flagellar motor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:2093-977
43. Shimizu TS, Tu Y, Berg HC. 2010. A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6(1):3822
44. Shoval O, Goentoro L, Hart Y, Mayo A, Sontag E, Alon U. 2010. Fold-change detection and scalar symmetry of sensory input fields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(36):15995-60000
45. Skoge ML, Endres RG, Wingreen NS. 2006. Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: Evidence for strongly coupled clusters. Biophys. J. 90:4317-266
46. Slonczewski JL, Macnab RM, Alger JR, Castle A. 1982. Effects of pH and repellent tactic stimuli on protein methylation levels in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 152:384-999
47. Provides the first in vivo input-output measurements of the E. coli chemotaxis signaling pathway. 47. Sourjik V, Berg HC. 2002. Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(1):123-277
48. Sourjik V, Berg HC. 2004. Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 428:437-411
49. Spiro PA, Parkinson JS, Othmer HG. 1997. A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7263-688
50. Spudich JL, Koshland DE Jr. 1975. Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72(2):710-133
51. Tu Y, Shimizu TS, Berg HC. 2008. Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(39):14855-600
52. Vaknin A, Berg HC. 2007. Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors. J. Mol. Biol. 366(5):1416-233
53. Wuichet K, Zhulin IB. 2010. Origins and diversification of a complex signal transduction system in prokaryotes. Sci. Signal. 3(128):ra500
54. Yi T-M, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J. 2000. Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97(9):4649-533
55. Zhang P, Khursigara CM, Hartnell LM, Subramaniam S. 2007. Direct visualization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor arrays using cryo-electron microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(10):3777-811