In vitro methods to model the gastrointestinal tract

Gastrointestinal Microbiology

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 237-252

  Mäkivuokko, Harri ^a   Nurminen, Päivi ^a  

^a Danisco Finland Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903228295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Zoetendal EG, von Wright A, Vilpponen-salmela T, Ben-Amor K, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM. Mucosa-associated bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract are uniformly distributed along the colon and differ from the community recovered from feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68:3401-3407.
2. Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Arvola T, Ruuska T, Isolauri E. Microbiota composition of the intestinal mucosa: association with fecal microbiota? Microbiol Immunol 2004; 48:497-500.
3. Rumney CJ, Rowland IR. In vivo and in vitro models of the human colonic flora. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1992; 31:299-331.
4. Edwards CA, Eastwood MA. Comparison of the effects of ispaghula and wheat bran on rat caecal and colonic fermentation. Gut 1992; 33:1229-1233.
5. Barry J-L, Hoebler C, Macfarlane GT, et al. Estimation of fermentability of dietary fibre in vitro: a European interlaboratory study. Br J Nutr 1995; 74:303-322.
6. Deprez S, Brezillon C, Rabot S, et al. Polymeric proanthocyanidins are catabolized by human colonic microflora into low-molecular-weight phenolic acids. J Nutr 2000; 130:2733-2738.
7. Oufir LE, Barry JL, Flourie B, et al. Relationships between transit time in man and in vitro fermentation of dietary fiber by fecal bacteria. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54:603-609.
8. Miller TL, Wolin MJ. Fermentation by the human large intestine microbial community in an in vitro semicontinuous culture system. Appl Environ Microbiol 1981; 42:400-407.
9. Gibson GR, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988; 54:2750-2755.
10. Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S, Gibson GR. Validation of a three-stage compound continuous culture system for investigating the effect of retention time on the ecology and metabolism of bacteria in the human colon. Microb Ecol 1998; 35:180-187.
11. Molly K, Vande WM, Verstraete W. Development of a 5-step multi-chamber reactor as a simulation of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1993; 39:254-258.
12. 11a. Alander M, De Smet I, Verstraete W, von Wright A, Mattila-Sandholm T. The effect of probiotic strains on the microbiota of the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME). Int J Food Microbiol 1999; 46:71-79.
13. Mäkivuokko H, Nurmi J, Nurminen P, Stowell J, Rautonen N. In vitro effects on polydextrose by colonic bacteria and Caco-2 cell cyclooxygenase gene expression. Nutr Cancer 2005; 52:93-103.
14. Herles S, Olsen S, Afflitto J, Gaffar A. Chemostat flow cell system: an in vitro model for the evaluation of antiplaque agents. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1748-1755.
15. Takahashi S, Sano M, Nishimura M, et al. Bactericidal effect of levofloxacin on strains with equal susceptibility in an in vitro urinary bladder model. Chemotherapy 1998; 44:337-342.
16. Minekus M, Marteau P, Havenaar R, Huis in‘t Veld HJ. A multicompartmental dynamic computer-controlled model simulating the stomach and small intestine. ATLA 1995; 23:197-209.
17. Minekus M, Smeets-Peeters M, Bernalier A, et al. A computer-controlled system to simulate conditions of the large intestine with peristaltic mixing, water absorption and absorption of fermentation products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1999; 53:108-114.
18. Marteau P, Minekus M, Havenaar R, Huis In’t Veld JHJ. Survival of lactic acid bacteria in a dynamic model of the stomach and small intestine: validation and the effects of bile. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80:1033.
19. Krul C, Humblot C, Philippe C, et al. Metabolism of sinigrin (2-propenyl glucosinolate) by the human colonic microflora in a dynamic in vitro large-intestinal model. Carcinogenesis 2002; 23:1011.
20. Macfarlane GT, Gibson GR, Cummings JH. Comparison of fermentation reactions in different regions of the human colon. J Appl Bacteriol 1992; 72:57-64.
21. Czerkawski JW. Compartmentation in the rumen, p. 65-82. An Introduction to Rumen Studies. Oxford OX3 OBW: Pergamon Press Ltd, 1986.
22. Morgavi DP, Newbold CJ, Beever DE, Wallace RJ. Stability and stabilization of potential feed additive enzymes in rumen fluid. Enzyme Microb Technol 2000; 26:171-177.
23. Hatfield RD, Weimer PJ. Degradation characteristics of isolated and in situ cell wall Lucerne pectic polysaccharides by mixed ruminal microbes. J Sci Food Agric 1995; 69:185-196.
24. Susmel P, Spanghero M, Marchetti S, Moscardini S. Trypsin inhibitory activity of raw soya bean after incubation with rumen fluid. J Sci Food Agric 1995; 67:441-445.
25. Lopez S, Valdes C, Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ. Influence of sodium fumarate addition on rumen fermentation in vitro. Br J Nutr 1999; 81:59-64.
26. Gomez JA, Tejido ML, Carro MD. Influence of disodium malate on microbial growth and fermentation in rumen-simulation technique fermenters receiving medium- and highconcentrate diets. Br J Nutr 2005; 93:479-484.
27. Blummel M, Karsli A, Russell JR. Influence of diet on growth yields of rumen micro-organisms in vitro and in vivo: influence on growth yield of variable carbon fluxes to fermentation products. Br J Nutr 2003; 90:625-634.
28. Ranilla MJ, Carro MD, Lopez S, Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ. Influence of nitrogen source on the fermentation of fibre from barley straw and sugarbeet pulp by ruminal micro-organisms in vitro. Br J Nutr 2001; 86:717-724.
29. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci Camb 1979; 93:217-222.
30. McDougall EO. Studies on ruminant saliva I. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem J 1948; 43:99.
31. Goering KH, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some repplication). Agricultural Handbook. Washington D.C.: Agricultural Research Counsil, U.S.Department of Agriculture, 1970.
32. Wallace RJ, Wallace SJ, McKain N, Nsereko VL, Hartnell GF. Influence of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation of corn and grass silages by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J Anim Sci 2001; 79:1905-1916.
33. Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal 1994; 48:185-197.
34. Cone JW, van Gelder AH, Visscher GJW, Oudshoorn L. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Animal 1996; 61:113-128.
35. Davies ZS, Mason D, Brooks AE, Griffith GW, Merry RJ, Theodorou MK. An automated system for measuring gas production from forages inoculated with rumen fluid and its use in determining the effect of enzymes on grass silage. Animal 2000; 83:205-221.
36. Czerkawski JW, Breckenridge G. Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 1977; 38:371-384.
37. Wallace RJ, Czerkawski JW, Breckenridge G. Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 1981; 46:131-148.
38. Dong Y, Bae HD, McAllister TA, Mathison GW, Cheng K-J. Lipid-induced depression of methane production and digestibility in the artificial rumen system (RUSITEC). Canadian J Anim Sci 1997; 77:269-278.
39. Ranilla MJ, Carro MD. Diet and procedures used to detach particle-associated microbes from ruminal digesta influence chemical composition of microbes and estimation of microbial growth in Rusitec fermenters. J Anim Sci 2003; 81:537-544.
40. Wang Y, McAllister TA, Rode LM, et al. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 2001; 85:325-332.
41. Russi JP, Wallace RJ, Newbold CJ. Influence of the pattern of peptide supply on microbial activity in the rumen simulating fermenter (RUSITEC). Br J Nutr 2002; 88:73-80.
42. Stewart DG, Warner RG, Seeley HW. Continuous culture as a method for studying rumen fermentation. Appl Microbiol 1961; 9:150-156.
43. Quinn LY. Continuous culture of ruminal microorganisms in chemically defined medium I. Design of continuous-culture apparatus. Appl Microbiol 1962; 10:580-582.
44. Rufener WH, Nelson WO, Jr., Wolin MJ. Maintenance of the rumen microbial population in continuous culture. Appl Microbiol 1963; 11:196-201.
45. Slyter LL, Nelson WO, Wolin MJ. Modifications of a device for maintenance of the rumen microbial population in continuous culture. Appl Microbiol 1964; 12:374-377.
46. Hoover WH, Crooker BA, Sniffen CJ. Effects of differential solid-liquid removal rates on protozoa numbers in continuous cultures of rumen contents. J Anim Sci 1976; 43:528-534.
47. Crawford RJ, Jr., Shriver BJ, Varga GA, Hoover WH. Buffer requirements for maintenance of pH during fermentation of individual feeds in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci 1983; 66:1881-1890.
48. Hannah SM, Stern MD, Ehle FR. Evaluation of a dual flow continuous culture system for estimating bacterial fermentation in vivo of mixed diets containing various soya bean products. Animal 1986; 16:51-62.
49. Weller RA, Pilgrim AF. Passage of protozoa and volatile fatty acids from the rumen of the sheep and from a continuous in vitro fermentation system. Br J Nutr 1974; 32:341-351.
50. Karunanandaa K, Varga GA. Colonization of rice straw by white-rot fungi (Cyathus stercoreus): effect on ruminal fermentation pattern, nitrogen metabolism, and fiber utilization during continuous culture. Animal 1996; 61:1-16.
51. Mansfield HR, Stern MD, Otterby DE. Effects of beet pulp and animal by-products on milk yield and in vitro fermentation by rumen microorganisms. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77:205-216.
52. Hoover WH, Kincaid CR, Varga GA, Thayne WV, Junkins LL, Jr. Effects of solids and liquidflows on fermentation in continuous cultures IV. pHand dilution rate. J Anim Science 1984; 58:692-699.
53. Fellner V, Sauer FD, Kramer JK. Steady-state rates of linoleic acid biohydrogenation by ruminal bacteria in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78:1815-1823.
54. Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, Chen XB, McIntosh FM. Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. J Anim Sci 1995; 73:1811-1818.
55. Leedle JAZ, Hespell RB. Brief incubations of mixed ruminal bacteria: effects of anaerobiosis and sources of nitrogen and carbon. J Dairy Sci 1983; 66:1003-1014.
56. Jayasuriya MCN, Hamilton R, Rogovic B. The use of an artificial rumen to assess low quality fibrous feeds. Biol Wastes 1987; 20:241-250.