Power and fairness in a generalized Ultimatum Game

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Ciampaglia, Giovanni Luca ^a   Lozano, Sergi ^b,c   Helbing, Dirk ^d  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUT CATALÀ DE PALEOECOLOGIA HUMANA I EVOLUCIÓ SOCIAL   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; GAME; GENERALIZED ULTIMATUM GAME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; DECISION MAKING;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84902590944     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099039     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Turner JC (2005) Explaining the nature of power: a three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology 35: 1-22.
2. Roth AE, Erev I (1995) Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 164-212.
3. Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367-388.
4. Güth W, Tietz R (1990) Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results. Journal of Economic Psychology 11: 417-449.
5. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, et al. (2001) In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The American Economic Review 91: 73-78.
6. Camerer C (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.
7. Güth W, Kocher MG (2013) More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature. Jena Economic Research Papers 2013-035, Jena. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/85032.
8. Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817-868.
9. Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K (2000) Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science 289: 1773-1775.
10. Szolnoki A, Perc M, Szabó G (2012) Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game. Physical review letters 109: 078701.
11. Murphy RO, Ackermann KA, Handgraaf MJ (2011) Measuring social value orientation. Judgment & Decision Making 6.
12. Grund T, Waloszek C, Helbing D (2013) How natural selection can create both self- and other-regarding preferences, and networked minds. Nat Sci Rep 3: 1480.
13. Frey BS, Bohnet I (1995) Institutions affect fairness: Experimental investigations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE): 286-303.
14. Binmore K, Morgan P, Shaked A, Sutton J (1991) Do people exploit their bargaining power? an experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 3: 295-322.
15. Winter F, Rauhut H, Helbing D (2012) How norms can generate conflict: An experiment on the failure of cooperative micro-motives on the macro-level. Social Forces 90: 919-946.
16. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters 2: 412-414. (Pubitemid 44387375)
17. Fiske ST (1993) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American psychologist 48: 621.
18. Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC (2003) From power to action. Journal of personality and social psychology 85: 453.
19. Guinote A (2007) Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33: 1076-1087.
20. Guinote A (2007) Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 685-697.
21. Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological review 110: 265.
22. Hogeveen J, Inzlicht M, Obhi SS (2013) Power changes how the brain responds to others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
23. Piff PK, Stancato DM, Côté S, Mendoza-Denton R, Keltner D (2012) Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 4086-4091.
24. Clark MS, Mills J (1979) Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 12-24.
25. Chen S, Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA (2001) Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of personality and social psychology 80: 173.
26. Handgraaf MJ, Van Dijk E, Vermunt RC, Wilke HA, De Dreu CK (2008) Less power or powerless? egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology 95: 1136.
27. Haney C, Banks C, Zimbardo P (1973) Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology & Penology.
28. Gilbert N, Xenitidou M, Zistler M, Helbing D, Jelasity M, et al, editors (2014) Quality collectives: evolving sociotechnical systems to support quality. ePub.
29. Rand DG, Tarnita CE, Ohtsuki H, Nowak MA (2013) Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous ultimatum game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 2581-2586.
30. Mason W, Suri S (2012) Conducting behavioral research on amazon's mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods 44: 1-23.
31. Berger R, Rauhut H, Prade S, Helbing D (2012) Bargaining over waiting time in ultimatum game experiments. Social Science Research 41: 372-379.
32. Dillman DA, Phelps G, Tortora R, Swift K, Kohrell J, et al. (2009) Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the internet. Social Science Research 38: 1- 18.
33. Ferrari S, Cribari-Neto F (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics 31: 799-815. (Pubitemid 39173835)
34. Bowles S (2009) Microeconomics: behavior, institutions, and evolution. Princeton University Press.
35. Gintis H, Helbing D (2013) Homo socialis: An analytical core for sociological theory. Available at SSRN 2362262.