Faculty members' perceptions towards institutional repository at a medium-sized university: Application of a binary logistic regression model

Library Review

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 189-202

  Oguz, Fatih ^a   Assefa, Shimelis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Faculty attitude; Institutional repositories; Self archiving; Teaching institutions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902517135     PISSN: 00242535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/LR-07-2013-0088     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrew, T. (2003), "Trends in self-posting of research material online by academic staff", Ariadne, No. 37, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/andrew.
2. Billings, M. (2006), Faculty Survey: Institutional Repositories, University Librarians Publication Series, available at: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/librarian_pubs/6.
3. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2014), "Carnegie classifications-classification descriptions", available at: http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/descriptions/.
4. Cervone, H.F. (2011), "Overcoming resistance to change in digital library projects" in OCLC Systems and Services, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 95-98.
5. Covey, D.T. (2009), "Self-archiving journal articles: a case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity" in Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 223-251.
6. Cullen, R., Chawner, B. (2011), "Institutional repositories, open access, and scholarly communication: a study of conflicting paradigms" in The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 460-470, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002.
7. Davis, P.M., Connolly, M.J.L. (2007), "Institutional repositories: evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace", D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13, Nos 3/4, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.
8. Field, A. (2007), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Sage, London.
9. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S. (2003), "RoMEO studies 2: how academics want to protect their open-access research papers" in Journal of Information Science, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 333-356.
10. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2009), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
11. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., Hilf, E.R. (2004), "The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access" in Serials Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 310-314, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013.
12. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S. (2000), Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
13. Jain, P. (2011), "New trends and future applications/directions of institutional repositories in academic institutions" in Library Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 125-141.
14. Kim, J. (2010), "Faculty self-archiving: motivations and barriers" in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 1909-1922.
15. Lercher, A. (2008), "A survey of attitudes about digital repositories among faculty at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge" in The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 408-415, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.06.008.
16. Mazzocchi, M. (2008), Statistics for Marketing and Consumer Research, SAGE, London.
17. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D., Jamali, H.R. (2012), "Digital repositories ten years on: what do scientific researchers think of them and how do they use them?" in Learned Publishing, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 195-206.
18. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., Rowland, F. (2008), "The citation advantage of open-access articles" in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59, No. 12, pp. 1963-1972.
19. OpenDOAR (2013), "OpenDOAR chart-proportion of repositories by continent-worldwide", available at: www.opendoar.org/find.php?format=charts.
20. Quinn, B. (2013), "Reducing psychological resistance to digital repositories" in Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 67-75.
21. Research Information Network (2010), "E-only scholarly journals: overcoming the barriers", available at: www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/e-only-scholarly-journals-overcoming-barriers.
22. RoMEO Statistics (2013), "SHERPA/RoMEO-statistics on publishers' copyright policies and self-archiving", available at: www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php.
23. Slade, S.M., Bates, K.F. (2011), "Carrot or stick?: persuading academic staff of the benefits of using an open access institutional repository", available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/15946/.
24. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S. (2006), Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed, Pearson, Harlow.
25. University of California Office of Scholarly Communication and the California Digital Library eScholarship Program (2007), Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Scholarly Communication: Survey Findings from the University Of California, University Of California, available at: www.lib.berkeley.edu/userresearch/surveys/2007_ CDL_OSC_Survey.pdf.
26. Van Noorden, R. (2009), "Open-access publishing gains another convert", Nature.
27. Xia, J. (2008), "A comparison of subject and institutional repositories in self-archiving practices" in The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 489-495, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.016.