Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 460-470

  Cullen, Rowena ^a   Chawner, Brenda ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655181881     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Suber P. Open Access in the United States. Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects 2006, Chandos Publishing, Oxford. N. Jacobs (Ed.).
2. White S., Creaser C. Scholarly Journal Prices: Selected Trends and Comparisons 2004, LISU, Loughborough, UK, Online. Available:, (April, 22 2011). http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/dils/lisu/downloads/op34.pdf.
3. Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: An Internet Discussion about Scientific and Scholarly Journals and Their Future 1995, Office of Scientific and Academic Publishing, Association of Research Libraries, Washington. A.S. Okerson, J.J. O'Donnell (Eds.).
4. Roosendaal H.E., Geurts P.A.T.M. Forces and Functions in Scientific Communication: An Analysis of their Interplay. paper presented at CRISP 97 Cooperative Research Information Systems in Physics, University of Oldenburg, Germany 1997, Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://www.physik.uni-oldenburg.de/conferences/crisp97/roosendaal.pdf.
5. Pinfield S., Gardner M., MacColl J. Setting up an Institutional E-Print Archive. Ariadne April 2002, 31.
6. Lynch C.A. Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 2003, 3(2):327-336.
7. Jinha A.E. Article 50Million: An Estimate of the Number of Scholarly Articles in Existence. Learned Publishing 2010, 23(3):258-263. 10.1087/20100308.
8. Jones R., Andrew T., MacColl J. The Institutional Repository 2006, Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
9. Open Society Institute Budapest Open Access Initiative Online. Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml.
10. Harnad S. A Subversive Proposal. Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing 1995, Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/subvert.html, A. Okerson, J. O'Donnell (Eds.).
11. Odlyzko A. Economic Costs of Toll Access. Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects 2006, Chandos Publishing, Oxford. N. Jacobs (Ed.).
12. OpenDOAR The directory of open access repositories Online. Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://www.opendoar.org.
13. Cullen R., Chawner B. Institutional Repositories in New Zealand: Comparing Individual Institutions' Strategies for Digital Preservation and Discovery. paper presented at IATUL [International Association of Technical University Libraries] Conference, Auckland April 2008.
14. Kim J. Motivating and Impeding Factors Affecting Faculty Contribution to Institutional Repositories. Journal of Digital Information 2007, 8(2). Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewArticle/193/177.
15. Rieh S.Y., Markey K., St. Jean B., Yakel E., Kim J. Census of Institutional Repositories in the U.S: A Comparison Across Institutions at Different Stages of IR Development. D-Lib Magazine November/December 2007, 13. Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november07/rieh/11rieh.html.
16. Hendler J. Reinventing Academic Publishing - Part 1. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2007, 22(5):2-3.
17. Gargouri Y.C., Hajjem C., Lariviere V., Gingras Y., Carr L., Brody T., Harnad S. Self-selected, or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLOS ONE October 2010, 5:e13636.
18. Schonfeld R.C., Housewright R. Faculty Survey 2009:Strategic Insights for Libraries, Publishers, and Societies. Online 2009, New York, Ithaka, Available:, (January 21, 2011). http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/faculty-surveys-2000-2009/faculty-survey-2009.
19. Creaser C. Open Access to Research Outputs-Institutional Policies and Researchers' Views: Results from two Complementary Surveys. New Review of Academic Librarianship 2010, 16(1):4-25.
20. ROARMAP, Registry of open access repository material archiving policies Online. Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://roarmap.eprints.org/.
21. University of California Office of Scholarly Communication, Faculty Attitudes and Behaviours Regarding Scholarly Communication: Survey Findings from the University of California 2007, 3. University of California, Available:, Online April 22, 2011. http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/responses/materials/OSC-survey-full-20070828.pdf.
22. J. Allen, "Interdisciplinary Differences in Attitudes Towards Deposit in Institutional Repositories", thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University (UK), 2005. Available: (April 22, 2011). http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00005180.
23. Heath M., Jubb M., Robey D. E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK. Ariadne 2008, 54.
24. Carr L., Brody T. Size isn't Everything: Sustainable Repositories as Evidenced by Sustainable Deposit Profiles. D-Lib magazine July/ August 2007, 13.
25. Henty M. Ten Major Issues in Providing a Repository Service in Australian Universities. D-Lib magazine May/ June 2007, 13.
26. Kim J. Faculty Self-archiving: Motivations and Barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(9):1909-1922.
27. Foster N.F., Gibbons S. Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories. D-Lib Magazine Jan 2005, 11.
28. Devakos R. Towards User Responsive Institutional Repositories: a Case Study. Library Hi-Tech 2006, 24(2):173-182.
29. Davis P., Connolly M.I.L. Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of D-space. D-Lib Magazine March/April 2007, 13.
30. Kingsley D. Repositories, Research and Reporting: The Conflict Between Institutional and Disciplinary Needs. paper presented at VALA Conference, Melbourne 2008.
31. Reid S.F. An Investigation into the Motivating Factors behind the Use or Non-use of Institutional Repositories by Selected University Academics. MLIS research project 2008, Victoria University of Wellington.
32. Zuber P. A Study of Institutional Repository Holdings by Academic Discipline. D-Lib Magazine November/December 2008, 14.
33. Antelman K. Do Open-access Articles have Greater Research Impact?. College and Research Libraries 2004, 65(5):372-382.
34. Eysenbach G. Citation advantage of open access articles. PLOS Biology 2006, 4(5).
35. Hajjem C., Harnad S., Gingras Y. Ten Year Cross-disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin December 2005, 28(4):39-47.
36. Brody T., Harnad S. Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the same Journals. D-Lib Magazine June 2004, 10.
37. Norris M., Oppenheim C., Rowland F. The Citation Advantages of Open-access Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology October 2008, 59(12):1963-1972.
38. Cullen R., Chawner B. Institutional Repositories: Assessing their Value to the Academic Community. Performance Measurement and Metrics 2010, 11(2):131-147.
39. NZresearch, Kiwi research information service Online. Available:, (April 22, 2011). http://nzresearch.org.nz/.