Asymmetric and category invariant feature transformations for domain adaptation

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 109, Issue 1-2, 2014, Pages 28-41

  Hoffman, Judy ^a   Rodner, Erik ^b   Donahue, Jeff ^a   Kulis, Brian ^c   Saenko, Kate ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain adaptation; Object recognition; Transformation learning

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFIERS; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

ADAPTIVE CLASSIFIERS; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; FEATURE ADAPTATION; IMAGING CONDITIONS; INVARIANT FEATURES; LEARNING METRICS; SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING; TRANSFORMATION LEARNING;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 84902292428     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-014-0719-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Argyriou, A.; Micchelli, C. A.; Pontil, M. (2010). On spectral learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 935-953.
2. Aytar, Y.; Zisserman, A. (2011). Tabula rasa: Model transfer for object category detection. In Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision (ICCV) (pp. 2252-2259).
3. Ben-david, S.; Blitzer, J.; Crammer, K.; Pereira, O. (2007). Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. In Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) (pp. 137-145). Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Bergamo, A.; Torresani, L. (2010). Exploiting weakly-labeled web images to improve object classification: A domain adaptation approach. In Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) (pp. 181-189).
5. Blitzer, J.; Dredze, M.; Pereira, F. (2007). Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. ACL, 7, 440-447.
6. Chopra, S.; Balakrishnan, S.; Gopalan, R. (2013). Dlid: Deep learning for domain adaptation by interpolating between domains. In ICML workshop on challenges in representation learning.
7. Dai, W.; Chen, Y.; Xue, G.; Yang, Q.; Yu, Y. (2008). Translated learning: Transfer learning across different feature spaces. In Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) (pp. 353-360).
8. Daume III, H. (2007). Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In ACL (pp. 256-263).
9. Davis, J.; Kulis, B.; Jain, P.; Sra, S.; Dhillon, I. (2007). Information-theoretic metric learning. In Proceedings of the international conference on Machine learning (ICML) (pp. 209-216).
10. Diethe, T.; Hardoon, D. R.; Shawe-Taylor, J. (2010 Constructing nonlinear discriminants from multiple data views. In Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases (pp. 328-343) Berlin: Springer.
11. Donahue, J.; Hoffman, J.; Rodner, E.; Saenko, K.; Darrell, T. (2013). Semi-supervised domain adaptation with instance constraints. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 668-675).
12. Donahue, J.; Jia, Y.; Vinyals, O.; Hoffman, J.; Zhang, N.; Tzeng, E.; et al. (2014). Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. In International conference in machine learning (ICML).
13. Duan, L.; Tsang, I. W.; Xu, D.; Maybank, S. J. (2009). Domain transfer svm for video concept detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1375-1381).
14. Duan, L.; Xu, D.; Tsang, I. W. (2012a). Learning with augmented features for heterogeneous domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the international conference on machine learning (pp. 711-718).
15. Duan, L.; Xu, D.; Tsang, I. W. H.; Luo, J. (2012b). Visual event recognition in videos by learning from web data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34(9), 1667-1680.
16. Farhadi, A.; Tabrizi, M. K. (2008). Learning to recognize activities from the wrong view point. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) (pp. 154-166).
17. Farquhar, J.; Hardoon, D.; Meng, H.; Shawe-taylor, J. S.; Szedmak, S. (2005). Two view learning: Svm-2k, theory and practice. In Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS) (pp. 355-362).
18. Gong, B.; Shi, Y.; Sha, F.; Grauman, K. (2012). Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2066-2073).
19. Gopalan, R.; Li, R.; Chellappa, R. (2011). Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach. In Proceedings of the international conference on computer vision (ICCV) (pp. 999-1006).
20. Hoffman, J.; Rodner, E.; Donahue, J.; Saenko, K.; Darrell, T. (2013). Efficient learning of domain-invariant image representations. In International conference on learning representations (ICLR). http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3224
21. Jhuo, I. H.; Liu, D.; Chang, S. F.; Lee, D. T. (2012). Robust visual domain adaptation with low-rank reconstruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2168-2175).
22. Jiang, J. (2008). A literature survey on domain adaptation of statistical classifiers. http://sifaka.cs.uiuc.edu/jiang4/domain-adaptation/survey/.
23. Jiang, J.; Zhai, C. X. (2007). Instance weighting for domain adaptation in NLP. In ACL (pp. 264-271).
24. Jiang, W.; Zavesky, E.; Chang, S.; Loui, A. (2008). Cross-domain learning methods for high-level visual concept classification. In International conference on image processing (ICIP) (pp. 161-164).
25. Kan, M.; Shan, S.; Zhang, H.; Lao, S.; Chen, X. (2012). Multi-view discriminant analysis. In Proceedings of the European computer vision conference (ECCV) (pp. 808-821). Berlin: Springer.
26. Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G. E. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems.
27. Kulis, B.; Jain, P.; Grauman, K. (2009). Fast similarity search for learned metrics. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(12), 2143-2157.
28. Kulis, B.; Saenko, K.; Darrell, T. (2011). What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1785-1792).
29. Li, R.; Zickler, T. (2012). Discriminative virtual views for cross-view action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2855-2862).
30. Li, X. (2007). Regularized adaptation: Theory, algorithms and applications. Ph.D. thesis, USA: University of Washington
31. Quadrianto, N.; Lampert, C. H. (2011). Learning multi-view neighborhood preserving projections. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 425-432).
32. Rodner, E.; Hoffman, J.; Donahue, J.; Darrell, T.; Saenko, K. (2013). Towards adapting imagenet to reality: Scalable domain adaptation with implicit low-rank transformations. arXiv:1308.4200 (preprint).
33. Saenko, K.; Kulis, B.; Fritz, M.; Darrell, T. (2010). Adapting visual category models to new domains. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (pp. 213-226).
34. Sharma, A.; Kumar, A.; Daume, H.; Jacobs, D. W. (2012). Generalized multiview analysis: A discriminative latent space. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2160-2167).
35. Torralba, A.; Efros, A. (2011). Unbiased look at dataset bias. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1521-1528).
36. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Hauptmann, A. G. (2007). Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive svms. In ACM Multimedia (pp 188-197).