Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 383-386

  Yousaf, Ajmal ^a   Aman, Nadia ^b   Manzoor, Manzoor Ahmed ^a   Shah, Jawad Ali ^a   Dilrasheed, ^a  

^a National Institute of Heart Diseases National University of Medical Sciences   (Pakistan)

^b Margalla Institute of Health Sciences   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Composite dental resin; Dentin sensitivity; Dentin bonding agents

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; SELF ETCH ADHESIVE; TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ADHESIVE AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME AND BOND NT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASS V SUPRA GINGIVAL CARIOUS LESION; COLD SENSITIVITY; COMPRESSED AIR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RESIN CEMENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902284762     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Perdiago J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total - etch versus self -etch adhesive, effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134:1621-9.
2. Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB. Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2009; 34:3-10.
3. Berkowitz GS, Horowitz AJ, DMD, Curro FA, Craig RG, Ship JA, et al. Postoperative hyper-sensitivity in class-I resin-based composite restorations in general practice: Interim results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009; 30:356-63.
4. Turkun LS. The clinical performance of one and two step self etch adhesive systems at one year. J Am Dental Assoc 2005; 136:656-64.
5. Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011; 56:31-44.
6. Burke FJ. What is new in dentin bonding? Self etch adhesive. Dent Update 2004; 31:580-9.
7. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for restoration of non-carious cervical lesion. Oper Dent 2007; 32:11-5.
8. Casselli DS, Martins LR. Postoperative sensitivity in class-1 composite resin restoration in vivo. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 53-8.
9. Ibarra G, Johnson GH, Geurtsen W, Varga MA. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restoration bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self etch adhesive resin based dental cement. Dent Mater 2007; 23:218-25.
10. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Hyakutake H, Matsuya S, Goto Y, Akamine A. Long-term follow-up of composite resin restorations with self etch adhesives. J Dent 2007; 35:535-40.
11. Nash RW, Lowe RA, Leinfelder K. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1099-104.
12. Brännstrom M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 88:7-13.
13. Sobral MA, Garone-Netto N, Luz MA, Santos AP. Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: a preliminary clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32:661-8.
14. Burrow MF, Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Messer HH. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2009; 34:648-55.
15. Swift EJ Jr, Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr.36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in class-I restorations. Am J Dent 2008; 21:148-52.
16. Krithikadatta J. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13:173-83.
17. Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Class-I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo postoperative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Am J Dent 1998; 11:229-34.
18. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Kern M. Comparison of using calcium hydroxide or a dentine primer for reducing dentinal pain following crown preparation: a randomized clinical trial with an observation time upto 30 months. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 344-50.
19. Blunck U, Zaslansky P. Effectiveness of all-in-one adhesive systems tested by thermocycling following short and long-term water storage. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9:231-40.
20. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self etch adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15:32-41.