Using packable composites for direct posterior placement

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 132, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 1099-1104

  Nash, Ross W ^a,b   Lowe, Robert A ^c   Leinfelder, Karl ^d,e  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Ross Nash Seminars   (United States)

^c Esthetic Epitome Program   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TENURE QUIK;

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATRIX BANDS; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; RUBBER DAMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0035432686     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0334     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gerbo L, Leinfelder KF, Mueninghoff L, Russell C. Use of optical standards for determining wear of posterior composite resins. J Esthet Dent 1990;2(5):148-52.
2. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. JADA 1995;126:663-72.
3. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Wall JT. Five year clinical evaluation of composite resins in anterior and posterior teeth. J Oper Dent 1989;5:57-65.
4. Mazer RB, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating a microfill posterior composite resin: a five-year study. JADA 1999;123(4):32-8.
5. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder KF. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:544-50.
6. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ Jr. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(5):234-49.
7. Miranda WG Jr, Nunes MF, Cardoso PE, Santos JF. Microleakage of condensable composite resins combined with a flowable composite (abstract 1603). J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):306.
8. Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. JADA 2000;131(3):375-83.
9. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peters MC. Curing light performance and polymerization of composite restorative materials. J Dent 1992;20(3):183-8.
10. Walls AW, McCabe JF, Murray JJ. The polymerization contraction of visible light activated composite resins. J Dent 1988;16(4):177-81.
11. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin based composites: a comparison. JADA 2000;131:1610-5.
12. Jackson RD. The importance of technique in preventing postoperative sensitivity when placing bonded restorations. Dent Today 1999;18(9): 44-9.
13. Nash RW, Radz GM. Condensable composites. J Am Acad Cosmet Dent Summer 1998:46-50.
14. Freedman G. Condensable composites: the new paradigm in amalgam alternatives. Dent Today 1998;17(10):72-4.
15. Leinfelder KF, Radz GM, Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19(3):230-7.
16. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26(2):95-110.
17. Kanka J III. Resin bonding to wet substrate, 1: bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992;23(1):39-41.