Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite - A randomized clinical trial

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 648-655

  Burrow, M F ^a   Banomyong, D ^a,b   Harnirattisai, C ^b   Messer, H H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70849127633     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/08-098-C     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sakaguchi RL (2005) Review of the current status and challenges for dental posterior restorative composites: Clinical, chemistry, and physical behavior considerations. Summary of discussion from the Portland Composites Symposium (POCOS) June 17-19, 2004, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland Oregon Dental Materials 21 (1) 3-6.
2. Ratih DN, Palamara J E A & Messer HH (2007) Dentinal fluid flow and cuspal displacement in response to resin composite restorative procedures Dental Materials 23 (11) 1405-1411.
3. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y & Akamine A (2001) Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: Clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program Journal of Dentistry 29 (1) 7-13.
4. Casselli DS & Martins LR (2006) Postoperative sensitivity in Class I composite resin restorations in vivo Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 8 (1) 53-58.
5. Ritter AV & Swift EJ (2003) Current restorative concepts of pulp protection Endodontic Topics 5 (1) 41-48.
6. Christensen GJ (2002) Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations Journal of the American Dental Association 133 (2) 229-231.
7. Akimoto N, Momoi Y, Kohno A, Suzuki S, Otsuki M, Suzuki S & Cox CF (1998) Biocompatibility of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Clearfil AP-X system on non-exposed and exposed primate teeth Quintessence International 29 (3) 177-188.
8. Cox CF, Hafez AA, Tarim B, Akimoto N, Imazato S & Mills J (1998) The role of the hybrid layer to prevent bacterial microleakage Journal of Dental Research 77 (Special Issue B) Abstract 99 669.
9. Akpata ES & Sadiq W (2001) Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites American Journal of Dentistry 14 (1) 34-38.
10. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF & Ravaud P (2008) Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration Annals of Internal Medicine 148 (4) 295-309. (Pubitemid 351665487)
11. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC & Lang T (2001) The revised CON-SORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration Annals of Internal Medicine 134 (8) 663-694.
12. Hickel R, Roulet J-F, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M & Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98-FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 (Supplement 1) 121-147.
13. Rowbotham MC (2001) What is a "clinically meaningful" reduction in pain? Pain 94 (2) 131-132.
14. Williamson A & Hoggart B (2005) Pain: A review of three commonly used pain rating scales Journal of Clinical Nursing 14 (7) 798-804.
15. Bjorndal L, Mjor IA & Odont D (2001) Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 4: Dental caries-Characteristics of lesions and pulpal reactions Quintessence International 32 (9) 717-736.
16. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA & Reich SM (2007) Marginal integrity: Is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 (Supplement 1) 107-116.
17. Baratieri LN & Ritter AV (2001) Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 13 (1) 50-57.
18. Mjor IA (2001) Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 2: Initial reactions to preparation of teeth for restorative procedures Quintessence International 32 (7) 537-551.
19. Fusayama T & Terachima S (1972) Differentiation of two layers of carious dentin by staining Journal of Dental Research 51 (3) 866.
20. Fusayama T (1979) Two layers of carious dentin-Diagnosis and treatment Operative Dentistry 4 (2) 63-70.
21. McComb D (2000) Caries-detector dyes-how accurate and useful are they? Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 66 (4) 195-198.
22. Harnirattisai C, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y & Hosoda H (1992) Interfacial morphology of an adhesive composite resin and etched caries-affected dentin Operative Dentistry 17 (6) 222-228.
23. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ & Verdonschot EH (1998) Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo Journal of Dentistry 26 (7) 555-562.
24. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S & Hodges JS (2003) Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: Effect on postoperative sensitivity Journal of the American Dental Association 134 (12) 1621-1629.
25. Akpata ES & Behbehani J (2006) Effect of bonding systems on post-operative sensitivity from posterior composites American Journal of Dentistry 19 (3) 51-154.
26. Perdigao J, Anauate-Netto C, Carmo A R P, Hodges JS, Cordeiro H J D, Lewgoy HR, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N & Amore R (2004) The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results Quintessence International 35 (10) 777-784.