The LMA-Supreme versus the I-gel in simulated difficult airway in children: A randomised study

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 280-284

  Kus, Alparslan ^a   Gok, Cigdem N ^a   Hosten, Tulay ^a   Gurkan, Yavuz ^a   Solak, Mine ^a   Toker, Kamil ^a  

^a KOCAELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM;

AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CERVICAL COLLAR; CHILD; CHILD CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; FIBEROSCOPE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LARYNGEAL MASK; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OROPHARYNX AIRWAY; PREMEDICATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STOMACH TUBE; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FIBER OPTICS; OROPHARYNX; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; TIME;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; OROPHARYNX; PRESSURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84902213924     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000062     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hernandez MR, Klock PA Jr, Ovassapian A. Evolution of the extraglottic airway: a review of its history, applications, and practical tips for success. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:349-368.
2. Gasteiger L, Brimacombre J, Oswald E, et al. LMA Proseal vs I-gel in ventilated children: a randomized, crossover study using the size 2 mask. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:1321-1324.
3. Goyal R, Ravindra NS, Kumar G. Comparison of size 2 I-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-Poseal and LMA-Classic in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22:355-359.
4. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia 2005; 60:1022-1026. (Pubitemid 41387859)
5. Atef HM, Helmy AM, El-Taher EM, Henidak AM. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2012; 21:583-590.
6. Van Zundert A, Brimacombe J. The LMA Supreme: a pilot study. Anasthesia 2008; 63:326.
7. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, et al. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-Supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaestheol Scand 2009; 53:852-857.
8. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme: a new single-use LMA with gastric access - a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:405-410.
9. Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Hande J, et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 nonparalysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:555-562.
10. Intersurgical, I-gel User Guide. http://www.I-gel.com
11. Caplan AR, Benumof JL, Berry AF, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society Anesthesiologists Task force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1269-1277. (Pubitemid 36520216)
12. Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:344-348. (Pubitemid 41487345)
13. Le Rocher, Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles. LMA Supreme Instruction Manual. 2007. http://www.LMACO.com
14. Jagannathan N, Sommers K, Sohn LE, et al. A randomized equivalance trial comparing the I-gel and laryngeal mask airway supreme in children. Pediatr Anesth 2013; 23:127-133.
15. Park SH, Han SH, Do SH, Kim JH. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:112-117.
16. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the I-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 111:55-62.
17. Westhorpe RN. The position of the larynx in children and its relationship to the ease of intubation. Anaesth Intens Care 1987; 15:384.
18. Holzman R. Anatomy and embryology of the paediatric airway. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 1998; 16:707-727.
19. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Chang E, Sawardekar A. A cohort evaluation of the laryngeal mask airway-Supreme in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22:759-764.
20. Fukuhara A, Okutani R, Oda Y. A randomized comparison of the I-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings. J Anesth 2013; 27:1-6.
21. Beringer RM, Kelly F, Cook TM, et al. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric I-gel airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia 2011; 66:1121-1126.
22. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, et al. A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67:632-639.
23. Lee JR, Kim MS, Kim JT, et al. A randomised trial comparing the I-gel with the LMA classic in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67:606-611.
24. Wong JG, Heaney M, Chambers NA, et al. Impact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in children. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19:464-469.