A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children

Anaesthesia

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 632-639

  Jagannathan, N ^a   Sohn, L E ^a   Sawardekar, A ^a   Gordon, J ^a   Langen, K E ^a   Anderson, K ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY DYNAMICS; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL PROCEDURE; ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; DRAINAGE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INFANT; INSUFFLATION; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; LARYNGOSCOPY; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84860838710     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Timmermann A,. Supraglottic airways in difficult airway management: successes, failures, use and misuse. Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (Suppl 2): 45-56.
2. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2005; 52: 739-60.
3. White MC, Cook TM, Stoddart PA,. A critique of elective pediatric supraglottic airway devices. Pediatric Anesthesia 2009; 19 (Suppl 1): 55-65.
4. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B,. LMA Supreme-A new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 101: 405-10.
5. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M,. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA supreme, comparison with LMA ProSeal. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandanavica 2009; 53: 852-7.
6. Tham HM, Tan SM, Woon KL, Zhao YD,. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2010; 57: 672-8.
7. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C,. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme-A single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 79-83.
8. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al., Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2010; 27: 602-7.
9. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Chang E, Langen KE, Anderson K,. A randomised trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ with the laryngeal mask airway Unique™ in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 139-44.
10. Drage MP, Nunez J, Vaughan RS, Asai T,. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1167-70.
11. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C,. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Pediatric Anesthesia 2001; 11: 319-21.
12. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J,. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002; 88: 127-9.
13. Park C, Bahk JH, Ahn WS, Do SH, Lee KH,. The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2001; 48: 413-7.
14. Brimacombe J, Keller C,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-9.
15. Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, et al., Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 555-62.
16. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K,. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004; 93: 528-31.
17. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G,. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 95: 827-30.
18. Lardner DR, Cox RG, Ewen A, Dickinson D,. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2008; 55: 29-35.
19. Garcia-Aguado R, Vinoles J, Brimacombe J, Vivo M, Lopez-Estudillo R, Ayala G,. Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2006; 53: 398-403.
20. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Barragan L, Keller C,. Bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway has higher first attempt success rate than the digital technique in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006; 96: 238-41.
21. Trevisanuto D, Parotto M, Doglioni N, Ori C, Zanardo V, Micaglio M,. The Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA): a new neonatal supraglottic device: comparison with Classic and ProSeal LMA in a manikin. Resuscitation 2012; 83: 97-100.
22. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 94: 385-9.
23. Kelly F, Sale S, Bayley G, Cook T, Stoddart P, White M,. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children. Pediatric Anesthesia 2008; 18: 947-51.
24. Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, et al., Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2010; 54: 141-6.
25. Inagawa G, Okuda K, Miwa T, Hiroki K,. Higher airway seal does not imply adequate positioning of laryngeal mask airways in paediatric patients. Pediatric Anesthesia 2002; 12: 322-6.
26. Karippacheril JG, Varghese E,. Crossover comparison of airway sealing pressures of 1.5 and 2 size LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children, measured with the manometric stability test. Pediatric Anesthesia 2011; 21: 668-72.
27. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Pediatric Anaesthesia 2005; 15: 229-34.
28. Brimacombe J, Berry A,. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1993; 76: 457.
29. Danha RF, Thompson JL, Popat MT, Pandit JJ,. Comparison of fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation through classic and single-use laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 184-8.