Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients

Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 583-590

  Atef, Hossam M ^a   Helmy, Amr M ^a   El Taher, Ezzat M ^a   Henidak, Ahmed Mosaad ^a  

^a Suez Canal University Faculty of Medicine   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Classical laryngeal mask airway; I gel; Supraglottic airway devices

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; OXYGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LARYNGEAL MASK; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUPINE POSITION; TIME;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; DEVICE REMOVAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUPINE POSITION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865815654     PISSN: 05440440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. James CD: Sir William Macewen and anaesthesia. Anaesthesia; 1974, 29:743-53.
2. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR): International Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care. An International Consensus on Science. Resuscitation; 2000, 6:29-71.
3. Peppard SB, Dickens JH: Laryngeal injury following short-term intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983, 92:327-30.
4. th ed. p. 1617-52. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005.
5. Jayashree S: Laryngeal mask airway and its variants. Indian J Anaesth; 2005, 49:275-80.
6. Weiler N, Latorre F, Eberle B, Goedecke R, Heinrichs W: Respiratory mechanics, gastric insufflation pressure, and air leakage of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg; 1997, 84:1025-8.
7. Barker P, Langton JA, Murphy PJ, Rowbotham DJ: Regurgitation of gastric contents during general anaesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth; 1992, 69:358-60.
8. Payne J: The use of the fibreoptic laryngoscope to confirm the position of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia; 1989, 44:865.
9. Morgan EG, Maged MS: Airway management. In: Clinical anesthesiology. 4th ed. p. 65. McGraw-Hill Companies; USA 2006.
10. Asai T, Murao K, Shingu K: Efficacy of the laryngeal tube during intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia; 2000, 55:1099-102.
11. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC: Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: A novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia; 2005, 60:1022-6.
12. Brain A, Denman WT, Goudsouzian NG: Laryngeal Mask Airway Instruction Manual. San Diego, Calif: LMA North America Inc; 1999.
13. Richez B, Saltel L, Banchereau F: A new single use supraglottic device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: An observational study of the I-gel. Anesth Analg; 2008, 106:1137-9.
14. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Morris R: Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth; 1999, 82:286-7.
15. th ed. Iowa State University Press; 1989.
16. Michalek P, Hodgkinson P, Donaldson W: Fibreoptic intubation through an I-gel supraglottic airway in two patients with predicted difficult airway and intellectual disabilityAnesth. Analg; 2008, 106:1501-4.
17. Soar J: The I-gel supraglottic airway and resuscitation-some initial thoughts. Resuscitation; 2007, 74:197.
18. Francksen H, Renner JP, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B: A comparison of the i-gel™ with the LMA-Unique™ in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia; 2009, 64:1118-24.
19. Janakiraman C, Chethan DB, Wilkes AR, Stacey MR, Goodwin N: A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia; 2009, 64:674-8.
20. Uppal V, Gangaiah S, Fletcher G, Kinsella J: Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults. BJA; 2009, 103:882-5.
21. Jindal P, Rizvi A, Sharma JP: Is I-gel a new revolution among supraglottic airway devices? A comparative evaluation. Middle East J Anesthesiol; 2009, 20:53-8.
22. Acott CJ: Extraglottic airway devices for use in diving medicine-part 3: The i-gel. Diving Hyperbaric Med; 2008, 38:124-7.
23. Gatward JJ, Cook T, Seller C, Handel J: Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralyzed patients. Anesthesia; 2008, 10:1365-9.
24. Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Gabbott DA, Haslam GM, Cook TM: I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anesthesia; 2008, 63:991-5.
25. Latorre F, Eberle B, Weiler N, Mienert R, Stanek A, Goedecke R, et al: Laryngeal mask airway position and the risk of gastric lnsufflation. Anesth Analg; 1998, 86:867-71.
26. Schmidbauer W, Berker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T: Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anesth; 2008, 10:1093.