A cohort evaluation of the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Supreme™ in children

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 759-764

  Jagannathan, Narasimhan ^a   Sohn, Lisa E ^a   Chang, Edwina ^b   Sawardekar, Amod ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Airway; Airway devices; Audit; Child; Equipment; Laryngeal mask airway

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; NITROUS OXIDE; SEVOFLURANE;

ADOLESCENT; AIRWAY; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COUGHING; DYSPHONIA; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SORE THROAT; STOMACH TUBE;

ADOLESCENT; AIR PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLINICAL AUDIT; COHORT STUDIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84863724314     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03832.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, et al. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 141-146.
2. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, et al. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 852-857.
3. Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 555-562.
4. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B,. LMA-Supreme-a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 405-410.
5. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, et al. A randomised trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme with the laryngeal mask airway unique in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 139-144.
6. Drage MP, Nunez J, Vaughan RS, et al. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1167-1170.
7. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C,. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2001; 11: 319-321.
8. Kelly F, Sale S, Bayley G, et al. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children. Pediatr Anesth 2008; 18: 947-951.
9. Wheeler M,. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance. Pediatr Anesth 2006; 16: 297-301.
10. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M,. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 969-972.
11. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G,. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 827-830.
12. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, et al. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme-a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 79-83.
13. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 385-389.
14. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H,. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 405-410.
15. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1605-1610.
16. Lardner DR, Cox RG, Ewen A, et al. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade. Can J Anaesth 2008; 55: 29-35.
17. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, et al. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 528-531.
18. White MC, Cook TM, Stoddart PA,. A critique of elective pediatric supraglottic airway devices. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19 (Suppl 1): 55-65.
19. Szmuk P, Ghelber O, Matuszczak M, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of cobra perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway unique in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1523-1530.
20. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Mankoo R, et al. Prospective evaluation of the self-pressurized air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children. Pediatr Anesth 2011; 21: 673-680.
21. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Luepold B, et al. Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 102-110.
22. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 229-234.
23. Tham HM, Tan SM, Woon KL, et al. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57: 672-678.
24. Bagshaw O,. The size 1.5 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric anaesthetic practice. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12: 420-423.