Evaluation of physicians' cognitive styles

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 627-637

  Djulbegovic, Benjamin ^a,b   Beckstead, Jason W ^c   Elqayam, Shira ^d   Reljic, Tea ^a   Hozo, Iztok ^e   Kumar, Ambuj ^a   Cannon Bowers, Janis ^f   Taylor, Stephanie ^a   Tsalatsanis, Athanasios ^a   Turner, Brandon ^g   Paidas, Charles ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Departments of Hematology and Health Outcomes and Behavior Moffitt Cancer   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e INDIANA UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^g STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

dual processing theories; individual differences in decision making; medical decision making; physicians' cognitive styles

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; PSYCHOMETRICS;

EID: 84902185797     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14525855     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Appelt KC, Milch KF, Handgraaf MJJ, Weber EU. The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgm Decis Mak. 2011 ; 6 (3). 252-62
2. Stanovich KE, West RF. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 ; 23: 645-726
3. Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ. 1955 ; 69 (1). 99-118
4. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. J Pers Assess. 1984 ; 48 (3). 306-7
5. Budner S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. J Pers. 1962 ; 30: 29-50
6. Leary MR, Shepperd JA, McNeil MS, Jenkins TB, Barnes BD. Objectivism in information utilization: theory and measurement. J Pers Assess. 1986 ; 50 (1). 32-43
7. Frederick S. Cognitive reection and decision making. J Econ Perspect. 2005 ; 19 (4). 25-42
8. Pacini R, Epstein S. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 ; 76: 972-87
9. Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 ; 8 (3). 223-41
10. Stanovich KE Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press ; 2011
11. Kruglanski AW, Gigerenzer G. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychol Rev. 2011 ; 118 (1). 97-109
12. Evans JSTBT. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: extension and evaluation. Psychonom Bull Rev. 2006 ; 13: 378-95
13. Evans JSTBT New York (NY): Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis Group ; 2007
14. Evans JSTBT, Curtis-Holmes J. Rapid responding increases belief bias: evidence for the dual theory of reasoning. Think Reason. 2005 ; 11: 382-9
15. Evans JS, Handley SJ, Neilens H, Over D. The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference. Q J Exp Psychol. 2010 ; 63 (5). 892-909
16. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world?. Behav Brain Sci. 2010 ; 33 (2-3). 61-83
17. Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM. Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science. 2011 ; 333 (6043). 776-8
18. Turner BM, Rim HB, Betz NE, Nygren TE. The maximization inventory. Judgm Decis Mak. 2012 ; 7 (1). 48-60
19. Evans JSTBT. Dual-process theories of reasoning: contemporary issues and developmental applications. Dev Rev. 2011 ; 31: 86-102
20. Evans JSBT, Barston JL, Pollard P. On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Mem Cogn. 1983 ; 11: 295-306
21. Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD. Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999 ; 125 (3). 367-83
22. Croson R, Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J Econ Lit. 2009 ; 47 (2). 448-74
23. Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. Q J Econ. 2003 ; 118 (3). 1049-74
24. Sobal J, DeForge BR. Reliability of Budner's intolerance of ambiguity scale in medical students. Psychol Rep. 1992 ; 71 (1). 15-8
25. Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE. Assessing miserly information processing: an expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Think Reason. Forthcoming
26. Beckstead JW. Isolating and examining sources of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 ; 47 (2). 224-46
27. Calder LA, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, et al. Experiential and rational decision-making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions. Emerg Med J. 2012 ; 29 (10). 811-6
28. Sladek RM, Bond MJ, Huynh LT, Chew DP, Phillips PA. Thinking styles and doctors' knowledge and behaviours relating to acute coronary syndromes guidelines. Implement Sci. 2008 ; 3: 23
29. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev. 2003 ; 93: 1449-75
30. Kahnemen D New York (NY): Farrar, Straus and Giroux ; 2011
31. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 2004 ; 24 (2). 311-22
32. Croskerry P.. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 ; 14: 27-35
33. Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009 ; 84 (8). 1022-8
34. Croskerry P, Abbass A, Wu AW. Emotional influences in patient safety. J Patient Saf. 2010 ; 6 (4). 199-205
35. Croskerry P, Nimmo GR. Better clinical decision making and reducing diagnostic error. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2011 ; 41 (2). 155-62
36. Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Beckstead J, Tsalatsanis A, Pauker SG. Dual processing model of medical decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 ; 12 (1). 94
37. Thompson VA, ProwseTurner JA, Pennycook G. Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cogn Psychol. 2011 ; 63: 107-40
38. Schwartz B, Ward A, Monterosso J, Lyubomirsky S, White K, Lehman DR. Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 ; 83 (5). 1178-97
39. Nenkov GY, Morrin M, Ward A, Schwartz B, Hulland J. A short form of the maximization scale: factor structure, reliability and validity studies. Judgm Decis Mak. 2008 ; 3: 371-88
40. Simon H New York (NY): Wiley ; 1957
41. Tanius BE, Wood S, Hanoch Y, Rice T. Aging and choice: applications to Medicare Part D. Judgm Decis Mak. 2009 ; 4 (1). 92-101
42. Norman GR, Eva KW. Does clinical experience make up for failure to keep up to date?. ACP J Club. 2005 ; 142 (3). A8 - A9
43. Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005 ; 142 (4). 260-73
44. Klein GA Cambridge (MA): MIT Press ; 1998
45. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004 ; 79: S70-81
46. Gerrity MS, DeVellis RF, Earp JA. Physicians' reactions to uncertainty in patient care: a new measure and new insights. Med Care. 1990 ; 28 (8). 724-36
47. Kassirer JP. Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty: a cause of excessive testing. N Engl J Med. 1989 ; 320 (22). 1489-91
48. McNeil BJ. Shattuck lecture - hidden barriers to improvement in the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2001 ; 345 (22). 1612-20
49. Song Y, Skinner J, Bynum J, Sutherland J, Wennberg JE, Fisher ES. Regional variations in diagnostic practices. N Engl J Med. 2010 ; 363 (1). 45-53
50. Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. J Am Med Assoc. 2012 ; 307 (14). 1513-6
51. Croskerry P. From mindless to mindful practice - cognitive bias and clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 2013 ; 368 (26). 2445-8