Isolating and Examining Sources of Suppression and Multicollinearity in Multiple Linear Regression

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 224-246

  Beckstead, Jason W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859605599     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2012.658331     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Azen, R. and Budescu, D. V. 2003. The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods,: 129-146.
2. Budescu, D. V. 1993. Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114: 542-551.
3. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. and Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Conger, A. J. 1974. A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34: 35-46.
5. Darlington, R. B. 1968. Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69: 161-182.
6. Horst, P. 1941. The prediction of personal adjustment: The role of prediction variables which are independent of the criterion. Social Science Research Bulletin, 48: 431-436.
7. Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. 1996. LISREL 8:User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software, Inc.
8. Maassen, G. H. and Bakker, A. B. 2001. Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretations. Sociological Methods and Research, 30: 241-270.
9. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L. and Lockwood, C. M. 2000. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science,: 173-181.
10. McFatter, R. M. 1979. The use of structural equation models in interpreting regression equations including suppressor and enhancer variables. Applied Psychological Measurement,: 123-125.
11. McNemar, Q. 1945. The mode of operation of suppressant variables. American Journal of Psychology, 58: 554-555.
12. Meehl, P. E. 1945. A simple algebraic development of Horst's suppressor variables. American Journal of Psychology, 58: 550-554.
13. Merlo, L. J., Lehmkuhl, H. D., Geffken, G. R. and Storch, E. A. 2009. Decreased family accommodation associated with improved therapy outcome in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77: 355-360.
14. Nickerson, C. 2008. Mutual suppression: A comment on Paulhus et al. (2004). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43: 556-563.
15. Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H. and Tracy, J. L. 2004. Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39: 303-328.
16. Pedhazur, E. J. 1997. Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction, 3rd ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
17. Shieh, G. 2006. Suppression situations in multiple linear regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66: 435-447.
18. Velicer, W. F. 1978. Suppressor variables and the semipartial correlation coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38: 325-335.
19. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M. and Gandek, B. 1993. SF-36 survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.