Comparison of the LMA supreme™ with the LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 265-271

  Lopez A M ^a   Valero, R ^a   Hurtado, P ^a   Gambs, P ^a   Pons, M ^a   Anglada, T ^a  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

airway equipment; complications; laryngeal mask airway; prone position

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; ROCURONIUM;

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASPIRATION; BRONCHOSPASM; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HICCUP; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOUTH INJURY; OXYGEN DELIVERY DEVICE; OXYGEN SATURATION; OXYGEN THERAPY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATION CONTROL; SORE THROAT; STOMACH DISTENSION;

EID: 79960492149     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer104     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ng A, Raitt DG, Smith G. Induction of anesthesia and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway in the prone position for minor surgery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1194-8 (Pubitemid 34441834)
2. Milligan KA. Laryngeal mask in the prone position. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 449
3. Stevens WC, Mehta PD. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in patients positioned prone for short surgical cases in an ambulat-ory surgery unit in the United States. J Clin Anesth 2008; 20: 487-8
4. Weksler N, Klein M, Rozentsveig V, et al. Laryngeal mask in prone position: pure exhibitionism or a valid technique. Minerva Anesthesiol 2007; 73: 33-7 (Pubitemid 46567183)
5. Edgcombe H, Carter K, Yarrow S. Anaesthesia in the prone pos-ition. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 165-83
6. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme: a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 405-10
7. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, et al. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal.ActaAnaes-thesiol Scand 2009; 53: 852-7
8. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryn-geal mask airway Supreme: a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 79-83
9. Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynae-cological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 815-9
10. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 602-7
11. Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 555-62
12. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, et al. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 262-5
13. Valero R, Serrano S, Adalia R, et al. Anesthetic management of a patient in prone position with a drill bit penetrating the spinal canal at C1-C2, using a laryngeal mask. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1447-50 (Pubitemid 38525606)
14. Brimacombe JR, Wenzel V, Keller C. The proseal laryngeal mask airway in prone patients: a retrospective audit of 245 patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007; 35: 222-5 (Pubitemid 46647299)
15. Martinez-Pons V, Madrid V. Ease placement of LMA ProSeal with a gastric tube inserted. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1816-7 (Pubitemid 38668952)
16. Garcia-Aguado R, Vinoles J, Brimacombe J, et al. Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 398-403 (Pubitemid 43670552)
17. Lopez AM, Valero R, Brimacombe J. Insertion and use of the LMA Supreme in the prone position. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 154-7.
18. Sharma V, Verghese C, McKenna PJ. Prospective audit on the use of the LMA-Supreme for airway management of adult patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 228-32
19. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal andstandard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 65-9 (Pubitemid 36077105)
20. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25-9 (Pubitemid 38031650)
21. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Aspiration ofgastric contents during use of a ProSeal laryngeal mask airway secondary to unidentified foldover malposition. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1192-4 (Pubitemid 37158713)