Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: A mixed methods design

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Maas, Marjo J M ^a,b   Sluijsmans, Dominique M A ^c   Van Der Wees, Philip J ^b   Heerkens, Yvonne F ^b,d   Nijhuis Van Der Sanden, Maria W G ^b   Van Der Vleuten, Cees P M ^e  

^a HAN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Zuyd Hogeschool Department Educational Research ^*  (Netherlands)

^d Dutch Institute of Allied Health Care NPi   (Netherlands)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinical performance; Peer assessment; Peer feedback; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PEER GROUP; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; STUDENT;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PEER GROUP; PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALTY; STUDENTS;

EID: 84902064739     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-117     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Educatieve strategieën. Wensing M, Grol R, Fluit C, Implementatie Eff Verbet van patiëntenzorg Amsterdam: Reed Business 4 2011 326 340
2. Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide. Grol R, Qual Health Care 1994 3 147 52 10.1136/qshc.3.3.147 10139412
3. Improving healthcare quality through organisational peer-to-peer assessment: lessons from the nuclear power industry. Pronovost PJ, Hudson DW, BMJ Qual Saf 2012 21 872 875 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000470 22562877
4. The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Sluijsmans DMA, Van Merriënboer JJG, Brand-gruwel S, Bastiaens TJ, Stud Educ Eval 2003 29 23 42 (Pubitemid 36462961)
5. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence. A systematic review. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Perrier L, Thorpe KE, JAMA 2006 296 1094 1102 10.1001/jama.296.9.1094 16954489 (Pubitemid 44343529)
6. " I ' ll mever play professional football " and other fallacies of self-assessment. Eva KW, Regehr G, J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008 28 14 19 10.1002/chp.150 18366120
7. A theory-based cross-sectional survey demonstrated the important role of awareness in guideline implementation. Rutten GM, Kremers S, Rutten ST, Harting J, J Clin Epidemiol 2009 62 167 176 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.004 18786808
8. Self-monitoring in clinical practice: a challenge for medical educators. Epstein RM, Siegel DJ, Silberman J, J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008 28 5 13 10.1002/chp.149 18366128
9. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer JM, Loney E, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CPM, Med Educ 2011 45 636 647 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03888.x 21564201
10. Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Topping KJ, Learn Instr 2010 20 339 343 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009. 08.003
11. Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and future directions. Van Zundert M, Sluijsmans D, van Merriënboer J, Learn Instr 2010 20 270 279 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
12. Reliability and validity of student peer assessment in medical education: a systematic review. Speyer R, Pilz W, Van Der Kruis J, Brunings JW, Med Teach 2011 33 572 585 10.3109/0142159X.2011.610835
13. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Gielen S, Peeters E, Dochy F, Onghena P, Struyven K, Learn Instr 2010 20 304 315 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
14. Assessing tutorial-based assessment. Eva KW, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2001 6 243 57 10.1023/A:1012743830638 11709638 (Pubitemid 33645956)
15. Peer assessment of professional competence. Dannefer EF, Henson LC, Bierer SB, Grady-weliky TA, Meldrum S, Nofziger AC, Barclay C, Epstein RM, Med Educ 2005 39 713 722 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02193.x 15960792 (Pubitemid 40897314)
16. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP, JAMA 1993 269 1655 1660 10.1001/jama.1993.03500130069034 8240483 (Pubitemid 23093951)
17. Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning. Violato C, Lockyer J, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2006 11 235 244 10.1007/s10459-005-5639-0 16832707 (Pubitemid 44036009)
18. Evaluating the assessment: sources of evidence for quality assurance. Birenbaum M, Stud Educ Eval 2007 33 29 49
19. Unravelling peer assessment: methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Strijbos J-W, Sluijsmans D, Learn Instr 2010 20 265 269 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002
20. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings. Boud D, Falchikov N, High Educ 1989 18 529 549 10.1007/BF00138746
21. Assessing assessment quality: criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning-A review of research studies. Tillema H, Leenknecht M, Segers M, Stud Educ Eval 2011 37 25 34 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03. 004
22. Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Van Gennip NAE, Segers MSR, Tillema HH, Educ Res Rev 2009 4 41 54 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
23. Assessing Medical Student Professionalism: An Analysis of a Peer Assessment. Cottrell S, Diaz S, Cather A, Shumway J, Med Educ Online 2006 11 1 8
24. Assessment in medical education. Epstein RM, N Engl J Med 2007 356 387 396 10.1056/NEJMra054784 17251535 (Pubitemid 46148781)
25. The role of peer meetings for professional development in health science education: a qualitative analysis of reflective essays. Schaub-de Jong MA, Cohen-Schotanus J, Dekker H, Verkerk M, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009 14 503 513 10.1007/s10459-008-9133-3 18766452
26. Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study. Nofziger AC, Naumburg EH, Davis BJ, Mooney CJ, Epstein RM, Acad Med 2010 85 140 147 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c47a5b 20042840
27. A critical analysis of mini peer assessment tool (mini-PAT). Abdulla A, J R Soc Med 2008 101 22 26 10.1258/jrsm.2007.070077 18263910 (Pubitemid 351413087)
28. Peer assessment of competence. Norcini JJ, Med Educ 2003 37 539 543 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01536.x 12787377 (Pubitemid 36718243)
29. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. Archer JC, Norcini J, Davies HA, BMJ 2005 330 1251 1253 10.1136/bmj.38447.610451.8F 15883137 (Pubitemid 40780478)
30. A practical guide to assessing clinical decision-making skills using the key features approach. Farmer EA, Page G, Med Educ 2005 39 1188 1194 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02339.x 16313577 (Pubitemid 41752333)
31. How specific is case specificity? Norman G, Bordage G, Page G, Keane D, Med Educ 2006 40 618 623 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02511.x 16836533 (Pubitemid 44366034)
32. Onderzoek naar de inhoudsvaliditeit van het performance-assessment in de hoofdfase van de bacheloropleiding fysiotherapie. Opheij M, Maas M, de Beer J, Tijdschr voor Med onderwijs 2006 25 88 95 10.1007/BF03056722
33. Falchikov N, Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education New York: Routledge Falmer 2 2013
34. Design of integrated practice for learning professional competences. Janssen-Noordman AMB, Merriënboer JJG, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Med Teach 2006 28 447 452 10.1080/01421590600825276 16973459 (Pubitemid 44446622)
35. Using templates in the thematic analysis of texts. King N, Cassel C, Symon G, Essent Guid to Qual methods Organ Res London: Sage 1 2004 256 270
36. Miles MB, Huberman MA, Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded Sourcebook Thousand Oaks: Sage 1994
37. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Biggs J, High Educ Res Dev 2006 18 57 75
38. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Kluger AN, van Dijk D, Med Educ 2010 44 1166 1174 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03849.x 21091758
39. Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Liu NF, Carless D, Teach High Educ 2006 11 279 290 10.1080/13562510600680582 (Pubitemid 44488761)
40. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Bandura A, Locke EA, J Appl Psychol 2003 88 87 99 12675397 (Pubitemid 36385695)
41. Bandura A, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control New York: Freeman 1997
42. Implementation and evaluation of peer assessment of clinical skills for first year student nurses. Rush S, Firth T, Burke L, Marks-Maran D, Nurse Educ Pract 2012 12 219 226 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.01.014 22357193
43. Transfer of learning: paradoxes for learners. Simons P, Int J Educ Res 1999 31 577 589 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00025-7 (Pubitemid 41167985)
44. Ormrod JE, Human Learning Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall 4 2004 153 213
45. Iacoboni M, Mirroring People: The new science of how we connect with others New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2009
46. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grèzes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P, Cereb Cortex 2005 15 1243 9 15616133 (Pubitemid 41373616)
47. Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise. Govaerts MJ, Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CP, Muijtjens AM, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011 16 151 65 10.1007/s10459-010-9250-7 20882335
48. Assessing self and peer-assessment: the students'views. Hanrahan S, Isaacs G, High Educ Res Dev 2001 20 53 70 10.1080/07294360123776 (Pubitemid 33260248)
49. Schn D, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. 1983
50. Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: the role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Van Gennip NA, Seger MS, Tillema HH, Learn Instr 2010 20 280 290 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010
51. Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Lin SSJ, Liu EZF, Yuan SM, J Comput Assist Learn 2001 17 420 432 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x