Multiscale characterization of acrylic bone cement modified with functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 37, Issue , 2014, Pages 141-152

  Slane, Josh ^a,b   Vivanco, Juan ^a,d   Ebenstein, Donna ^c   Squire, Matthew ^b   Ploeg, Heidi Lynn ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD ADOLFO IBÁÑEZ   (Chile)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Mechanical properties; Nanoindentation; Orthopedics; Reinforced polymer

Indexed keywords

CREEP; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; DISPERSIONS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOINDENTATION; ORTHOPEDICS; REINFORCEMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRESS RELAXATION; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS;

MESOPOROUS SILICA NANOPARTICLES; MICRO-INDENTATION TESTING; MULTISCALE CHARACTERIZATIONS; REINFORCED POLYMERS; REINFORCEMENT MATERIALS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPHS; STATIC MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; SURFACE FUNCTIONALIZATION;

BONE CEMENT;

ACRYLIC CEMENT; BONE CEMENT; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; MESOPOROUS SILICA NANOPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; SILICON DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; DYNAMICS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED PHOTOACOUSTIC SPECTROSCOPY; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; CHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; MICROTECHNOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE;

MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; MICROTECHNOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; POROSITY; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84901981949     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adelani M.A., Keeney J.A., Palisch A., Fowler S.A., Clohisy J.C. Has total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger improved? A systematic review. Clin. Orthop Relat. Res. 2013, 471:2595-2601.
2. Ania F., Broza G., Mina M.F., Schulte K., Roslaniec Z., Baltá-Calleja F.J. Micromechanical properties of poly(butylene terephthalate) nanocomposites with single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos. Interface 2006, 13:33-45.
3. Arun S., Rama Sreekanth P.S., Kanagaraj S. Mechanical characterisation of PMMA/SWNTs bone cement using nanoindenter. Mater. Technol. 2014, 29:B4-B9.
4. ASTM International Standard Test Method for Transition Temperatures and Enthalpies of Fusion and Crystallization of Polymers by Differential Scanning Calorimetry 2012, ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA.
5. Ayatollahi M., Karimzadeh A. Determination of fracture toughness of bone cement by nano-indentation test. Int. J. Fract. 2012, 175:193-198.
6. Beake B.D., Chen S., Hull J.B., Gao F. Nanoindentation behavior of clay/poly(ethylene oxide) nanocomposites. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2002, 2:73-79.
7. Bento A., Lourenço J.P., Fernandes A., Cerrada M.L., RosárioRibeiro M. Functionalization of mesoporous MCM-41 (nano)particles: preparation methodologies, role on catalytic features, and dispersion within polyethylene nanocomposites. ChemCatChem 2013, 5:966-976.
8. Chaplin R.P., Lee A.J., Hooper R.M., Clarke M. The mechanical properties of recovered PMMA bone cement: a preliminary study. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 17:1433-1448.
9. Chung S.M., Yap A.U., Tsai K.T., Yap F.L. Elastic modulus of resin-based dental restorative materials: a microindentation approach. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2005, 72:246-253.
10. Daniels A., Wirz D., Morscher E. Properties of bone cement: extreme differences in properties of successful bone cements. The Well-Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty 2005, Springer, Berlin. S. Breusch, H. Malchau (Eds.).
11. De Santis R., Mollica F., Ambrosio L., Nicolais L., Ronca D. Dynamic mechanical behavior of PMMA based bone cements in wet environment. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2003, 14:583-594.
12. Dhakal H.N., Zhang Z.Y., Richardson M.O.W. Nanoindentation behaviour of layered silicate reinforced unsaturated polyester nanocomposites. Polym. Test. 2006, 25:846-852.
13. Dunne N. Mechanical properties of bone cement. Orthopaedic Bone Cements 2008, 233-264. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. S. Deb (Ed.).
14. Fischer-Cripps A. Nanoindentation 2011, Springer, Dordrecht.
15. Fu S., Feng X., Lauke B., Mai Y. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate-polymer composites. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2008, 39:933-961.
16. Gonçalves G., Cruz S.M., Ramalho A., Grácio J., Marques P.A. Graphene oxide versus functionalized carbon nanotubes as a reinforcing agent in a PMMA/HA bone cement. Nanoscale 2012, 4:2937-2945.
17. Guo Z., Pereira T., Choi O., Wang Y., Hahn H.T. Surface functionalized alumina nanoparticle filled polymeric nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16:2800-2808.
18. Hailer, Garellick N.P., Karrholm, J.G. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010, 81:34-41.
19. International Organization for Standardization Implants for Surgery - Acrylic Resin Cements 2002, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. Izquierdo-Barba I., Colilla M., Vallet-Regi M. Nanostructured mesoporous silicas for bone tissue regeneration. J. Nanomater 2008, 1-14.
21. Jayasuriya R.L., Buckley S.C., Hamer A.J., Kerry R.M., Stockley I., Tomouk M.W., Wilkinson J.M. Effect of sliding-taper compared with composite-beam cemented femoral prosthesis loading regime on proximal femoral bone remodeling: a randomized clinical trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013, 95:19-27.
22. Jeffers J.R., Browne M., Lennon A.B., Prendergast P.J., Taylor M. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:1525-1533.
23. Ji X., Hampsey J.E., Hu Q., He J., Yang Z., Lu Y. Mesoporous silica-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15:3656-3662.
24. Kane R.J., Yue W., Mason J.J., Roeder R.K. Improved fatigue life of acrylic bone cements reinforced with zirconia fibers. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 2010, 3:504-511.
25. Karimzadeh A., Ayatollahi M.R. Investigation of mechanical and tribological properties of bone cement by nano-indentation and nano-scratch experiments. Polym. Test. 2012, 31:828-833.
26. Khaled S.M., Charpentier P.A., Rizkalla A.S. Physical and mechanical properties of PMMA bone cement reinforced with nano-sized titania fibers. J. Biomater. Appl. 2011, 25:515-537.
27. Khanuja H.S., Vakil J.J., Goddard M.S., Mont M.A. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011, 93:500-509.
28. Knoell A., Maxwell H., Bechtol C. Graphite fiber reinforced bone cement. An experimental feasibility investigation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1975, 3:225-229.
29. Kordás K., Kukkola J., Tóth G., Jantunen H., Szabó M., Sápi A., Kukovecz A., Kónya Z., Mikkola J. Nanoparticle dispersions. Springer Handbook of Nanomaterials 2013, 729-775. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. R. Vajtai (Ed.).
30. Kuehn K.D., Ege W., Gopp U. Acrylic bone cements: mechanical and physical properties. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2005, 36:29-39. (v-vi).
31. Kumar B., Cooke F.W. Fatigue behaviour of fiber reinforced bone cement. Fracture of Nano and Engineering Materials and Structures 2006, 1023-1024. Springer, Netherlands. E.E. Gdoutos (Ed.).
32. 2 nanocomposites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2006, 291:263-271.
33. Lelovics H., Liptakova T. Time and mixing technique-dependent changes in bone cement SmartSet(R) HV. Acta Bioeng. Biomech./Wroclaw Univ. Technol. 2010, 12:63-67.
34. Lennon A.B. Fracture toughness and fatigue characteristics of bone cements. Orthopaedic Bone Cements 2008, 265-310. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. S. Deb (Ed.).
35. Lewis G. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: state-of-the-art review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2003, 66:457-486.
36. Lewis G., Janna S. Effect of test specimen cross-sectional shape on the in vitro fatigue life of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4315-4321.
37. Lewis G., Xu J., Dunne N., Daly C., Orr J. Critical comparison of two methods for the determination of nanomechanical properties of a material: application to synthetic and natural biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, Appl. Biomater. 2006, 78:312-317.
38. Ma P.-C., Siddiqui N.A., Marom G., Kim J.-K. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos. Part A - Appl. Sci. 2010, 41:1345-1367.
39. Malzbender J., Steinbrech R.W. Mechanical properties of coated materials and multi-layered composites determined using bending methods. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2004, 176:165-172.
40. Marrs B., Andrews R., Rantell T., Pienkowski D. Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2006, 77:269-276.
41. Musib M., Jones J., Chakote K., Hayes W., Saha S. Microhardness of bi-antibiotic-eluting bone cement scaffolds. Prog. Biomater. 2012, 1:1-7.
42. Nottrott M., Molster A.O., Gjerdet N.R. Time dependent mechanical properties of bone cement. An in vitro study over one year. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2007, 83:416-421.
43. O'Connor D.O., Burke D.W., Jasty M., Sedlacek R.C., Harris W.H. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing. J. Orthop. Res.: Off. Publ. Orthop. Res. Soc. 1996, 14:769-777.
44. Oliver W.C., Pharr G.M. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 2004, 19:3-20.
45. Ormsby R., McNally T., Mitchell C., Dunne N. Incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes to acrylic based bone cements: effects on mechanical and thermal properties. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 2010, 3:136-145.
46. Ormsby R., McNally T., Mitchell C., Dunne N. Influence of multiwall carbon nanotube functionality and loading on mechanical properties of PMMA/MWCNT bone cements. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010, 21:2287-2292.
47. Ormsby R., McNally T., O'Hare P., Burke G., Mitchell C., Dunne N. Fatigue and biocompatibility properties of a poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8:1169-1179.
48. Padmanabhan S.K., Balakrishnan A., Chu M.C., Kim T.N., Cho S.J. Micro-indentation fracture behavior of human enamel. Dent. Mater. 2010, 26:100-104.
49. Park I., Pinnavaia T.J. Mesocellular silica foam as an epoxy polymer reinforcing agent. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17:2835-2841.
50. Park S., Hung C.T., Ateshian G.A. Mechanical response of bovine articular cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression loading at physiological stress levels. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2004, 12:65-73.
51. Pegel S., Pötschke P., Petzold G., Alig I., Dudkin S.M., Lellinger D. Dispersion, agglomeration, and network formation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in polycarbonate melts. Polymer 2008, 49:974-984.
52. Pilliar R.M., Blackwell R., Macnab I., Cameron H.U. Carbon fiber-reinforced bone cement in orthopedic surgery. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 1976, 10:893-906.
53. Qian L., Li M., Zhou Z., Yang H., Shi X. Comparison of nano-indentation hardness to microhardness. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 195:264-271.
54. Roques A., Browne M., Taylor A., New A., Baker D. Quantitative measurement of the stresses induced during polymerisation of bone cement. Biomaterials 2004, 25:4415-4424.
55. Samuel S.P., Li S., Mukherjee I., Guo Y., Patel A.C., Baran G., Wei Y. Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25:296-301.
56. Schiffmann K.I. Nanoindentation creep and stress relaxation tests of polycarbonate: analysis of viscoelastic properties by different rheological models. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2006, 97:1199-1211.
57. Shen L., Wang L., Liu T., He C. Nanoindentation and morphological studies of epoxy nanocomposites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2006, 291:1358-1366.
58. Slane J., Vivanco J., Meyer J., Ploeg H.L., Squire M. Modification of acrylic bone cement with mesoporous silica nanoparticles: effects on mechanical, fatigue and absorption properties. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014, 29:451-461.
59. Sonntag R., Reinders J., Kretzer J.P. What's next? Alternative materials for articulation in total joint replacement. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8:2434-2441.
60. Taurozzi J.S., Hackley V.A., Wiesner M.R. Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment - issues and recommendations. Nanotoxicology 2011, 5:711-729.
61. Tehrani M., Safdari M., Al-Haik M.S. Nanocharacterization of creep behavior of multiwall carbon nanotubes/epoxy nanocomposite. Int. J. Plast. 2011, 27:887-901.
62. Xu H.H.K., Quinn J.B., Smith D.T., Antonucci J.M., Schumacher G.E., Eichmiller F.C. Dental resin composites containing silica-fused whiskers - effects of whisker-to-silica ratio on fracture toughness and indentation properties. Biomaterials 2002, 23:735-742.
63. Zhang F.-A., Lee D.-K., Pinnavaia T.J. PMMA/mesoporous silica nanocomposites: effect of framework structure and pore size on thermomechanical properties. Polym. Chem. 2010, 1:107-113.