Critical comparison of two methods for the determination of nanomechanical properties of a material: Application to synthetic and natural biomaterials

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 312-317

  Lewis, Gladius ^a   Xu, Jie ^a   Dunne, Nicholas ^b   Daly, Catherine ^b   Orr, John ^b  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone; Bone cement; Mechanical properties; Nanotechnology

Indexed keywords

BONE; BONE CEMENT; COMPUTATION THEORY; ELASTIC MODULI; HIP PROSTHESES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

LOADING RATE; MODIFIED SLOPES METHOD; NANOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; OLIVER-PHARR METHOD;

BIOMATERIALS;

ACRYLIC CEMENT; BIOMATERIAL; PALACOS;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CORTICAL BONE; COW; FEMUR; HARDNESS; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODIFIED SLOPES METHOD; MOUSE; NANOINDENTATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OLIVER PHARR METHOD; PROCESS DESIGN; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE AND BONES; BONE CEMENTS; CATTLE; CHILD; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33746686325     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30489     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rho JY, Tsui TY, Pharr GM. Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 1997;18:1325-1330.
2. Ho SP, Goodis H, Balooch M, Nonomura G, Marshall SJ, Marshall G. The effect of sample preparation technique on determination of structure and nanomechanical properties of human cementum hard tissue. Biomaterials 2004;25:4847-4857.
3. Ebenstein DM, King K, Pruitt LA. A nanoindentation technique for measuring the mechanical properties of finger joint cartilage. Transactions of 29th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Reno, NV, April 30-May 3, 2003; p 718.
4. Towler MR, Bushby AJ, Billington RW, Hill RG. A preliminary comparison of the mechanical properties of chemically cured and ultrasonically cured glass ionomer cements, using nanoindentation techniques. Biomaterials 2001;22:1401-1406.
5. Arias JL, Mayor MB, Pou J, Leng Y, Leon B, Perez-Amor M. Micro- and nano- testing of calcium phosphate coatings produced by pulsed laser deposition. Biomaterials 2003;24:3403-3408.
6. Park K, Mishra S, Lewis G, Losby J, Fan Z, Park JB. Quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation studies on highly crosslinked ultra-high-molecular- weight polyethylene. Biomaterials 2004;25:2427-2436.
7. Pruitt L, Al-Marashi L, Young E, Petrie TA, Hetherington A, Goldstein P, Ebenstein D, Ries M. Evaluation of mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement from hip arthroplasty revision surgery. Transactions of the 7th World Biomaterials Congress, May 17-21, 2004, Sydney, Australia; p 1468.
8. Gong J, Miao H, Peng Z. On the contact area for nanoindentation tests with Berkovich indenter: Case study on soda-lime glass. Mater Lett 2004;58:1349-1353.
9. Dutta AK, Penumada D. Nanoindentation testing for evaluating modulus and hardness of single-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy composites. J Mater Res. 2004;19:158-164.
10. Chen S, Liu L, Wang T. Investigation of the mechanical properties of thin films by nanoindentation, considering effects of thickness and different coating-substrate combinations. Surf Coat Technol 2005;191:25-32.
11. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 1992;7:564-583.
12. Gong J, Miao H, Peng Z. Analysis of the nanoindentation data measured with a Berkovich indenter for brittle materials: effect of the residual contact stress. Acta Materialia 2004;52:785-793.
13. Bull SJ. Extracting hardness and Young's modulus from load-displacement curves. Z Metallkd 2002;93:870-874.
14. Oila A, Bull SJ. Nanoindentation testing of gear steels. Z Metallkd 2003;94:793-797.
15. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard D 5045-99. Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 08.03, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2001. p 347-355.
16. Kuhn K-D. Bone cements: up-to-date comparison of physical and chemical properties of commercial materials. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
17. Fan ZF, Smith PA, Harris GF. Mechanical properties of OI type III human bone tissue measured by nanoindentation. Transactions of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, February 20-23, 2005, Washington, DC, USA. p 0030.
18. Volkman SK, Galecki AT, Burke DT, Miller RA, Goldstein SA. Quantitative trait loci that modulate femoral mechanical properties in a genetically heterogeneous mouse population. J Bone Mineral Res 2004;19:1497-1505.
19. Sun K, Liebschner MAK. Biomechanics of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement. Spine 2004;29:1428-1435.
20. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 2004;19:3-20.
21. Joslin DI, Oliver WC. A new method for analyzing data from continuous depth-sensing microindentation tests. J Mater Res 1990;5:123-126.
22. Fischer-Cripps AC. Nanoindentation. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
23. Klapperich C, Komvopoulos K, Pruitt L. Nanomechanical properties of polymers determined from nanoindentation experiments. J Tribology 2001;123:624-631.
24. Briscoe BJ, Fiori L, Pelillo. Nano-indentation of polymeric surfaces. J Phys D: Appl Phys 1998;31:2395-4.
25. Wright-Charlesworth DD, Peers WJ, Miskioglu I, Loo LL. Nanomechanical properties of self-reinforced composite poly-(methyl methacrylate) as a function of processing temperature. J Biomed Mater Res 2005;74A:306-314.
26. Lidgren L, Bodelind B, Moller J. Bone cement improved by vacuum mixing and chilling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;57:27-32.
27. Trieu HH, Paxson RD, Carroll ME, Bert JM. A comparative study of bone cement preparation using a new centrifugation mixing technique. Transactions of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, April 5-9, Boston, MA, USA. p 416.
28. Dunne NJ, Orr JF. Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement. Biomater 2001;22:1819-1826.
29. Fan Z, Rho J-Y. Effects of viscoelasticity and time-independent plasticity on nanoindentation measurements of human cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;67A:208-214.