Time dependent mechanical properties of bone cement. An in vitro study over one year

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 416-421

  Nottrott, Markus ^a,b   Mølster, Anders Odd ^a,b   Gjerdet, Nils Roar ^a,b  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Ageing; Bone cement; Mechanical properties; Microstructure; Surface analysis; Test method

Indexed keywords

MICROCRACKS; MICROSTRUCTURE; POLYMERIZATION; SURFACE ANALYSIS;

PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; TEST METHODS;

BONE CEMENT;

BONE CEMENT; GENTAMICIN; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEFORMATION; BONE STRENGTH; CEMENTATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPIC ANATOMY; POLYMERIZATION; SIMULATION; TIME; WATER TRANSPORT; YOUNG MODULUS;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 35548943181     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30811     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Espehaug B, Fumes O, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:832-838.
2. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaster LB. The effect of the type of cement on early revision of charnley total hip prostheses - A review of 8,579 primary arthroplasties from the norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77:1543-1550.
3. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, O'Connor DO, Haire T, Harris WH. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:551-558.
4. Gilbert JL, Hasenwinkel JM, Wixson RL, Lautenschlager EP. A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinkage of bone cement: A potential major source of porosity. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:210-218.
5. Orr JF, Dunne NJ, Quinn JC. Shrinkage stresses in bone cement. Biomaterials 2003;24:2933-2940.
6. Boss JH, Shajrawi I, Mendes DG. The nature of the bone-implant interface. The lessons learned from implant retrieval and analysis in man and experimental animal. Med Prog Technol 1994;20:119-142.
7. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:111-121.
8. Nilsen AR, Wiig M. Total hip arthroplasty with Boneloc(R). Loosening in 102/157 cases after 0.5-3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996;67:57-59.
9. Furnes O, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. Exeter and charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68:515-520.
10. Thanner J, Freij-Larsson C, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Wesslen B. Evaluation of Boneloc. Chemical and mechanical properties, and a randomized clinical study of 30 total hip arthrolasties. Acta Orthop Scand 1995;66:207-214.
11. ISO. International standard ISO 5833 Implants for surgery - Acrylic resin cements. 1992.
12. American Society for Testing and Materials.Standard specification for acrylic bone cement (ASTM F451-99a). 1999.
13. Dunne NJ, Orr JF. Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2001;22:1819-1826.
14. Puska MA, Narhi TO, Aho AJ, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of crosslinked and oligomer-modified glass-fibre reinforced acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1037-1043.
15. Lewis G, Nyman JS. Toward standardization of methods of determination of fracture properties of acrylic bone cement and statistical analysis of test results. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:748-768.
16. Harper EJ, Bonfield W. Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:605-616.
17. Lewis G. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: State-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;66:457-486.
18. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N. Biomechanics of Artificial Joints: The Hip. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1997. pp 395-460.
19. Kuehn KD, Ege W, Gopp U. Acrylic bone cements: Mechanical and physical properties. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:29-39.
20. Arnold JC, Venditti NP. Effects of environment on the creep properties of a poly(ethylmethacrylate) based bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:707-717.
21. Ruyter IE, Svendsen SA. Flexural properties of denture base polymers. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:95-104.
22. Baleani M, Cristofolini L, Toni A. Temperature and ageing condition effects on the characterization of acrylic bone cement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2001;215:113-118.
23. Akashi A, Matsuya Y, Unemori M, Akamine A. The relationship between water absorption characteristics and the mechanical strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in long-term water storage. Biomaterials 1999;20:1573-1578.
24. Kjellson F, Brudeli B, McCarthy ID, Lidgren L. Water uptake and release from iodine-containing bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;71:292-298.
25. Deb S, Braden M, Bonfield W. Water absorption characteristics of modified hydroxyapatite bone cements. Biomaterials 1995;16:1095-1100.
26. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Matsuya S, Akashi A, Akamine A. Water absorption of poly(methyl methacrylate) containing 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic anhydride. Biomaterials 2003;24:1381-1387.
27. Schmitt S, Krzypow DJ, Rimmac CM. The effect of moisture absoption on the fatigue crack propagation resistance of acrylic bone cement. Biomed Technik 2004;49:61-65.
28. ISO.Inernational Standard, ISO 1567-Dentistry - Denture base polymers. 1999.
29. Ishiyama C, Higo Y. Effects of humidity on young's modulus in poly (methyl methacrylate). J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2002;40:460-465.
30. Oysaed H, Ruyter IE. Formation and growth of crazes in multiphase acrylic systems. J Mater Sci 1987;22:3373-3378.
31. Hailey JL, Turner IG, Miles AW, Price G. The effect of post-curing chemical changes on the mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1994;5:617-621.
32. Kuehn K-D. Bone cements. Up-to-date comparison of physical and mechanical properties of commercial materials. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2000, pp. 141-262.
33. Hendriks JG, Neut D, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. The release of gentamicin from acrylic bone cements in a simulated prosthesis-related interfacial gap. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;64:1-5.
34. Hendriks JG, Neut D, Hazenberg JG, Verkerke GJ, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. The influence of cyclic loading on gentamicin release from acrylic bone cements. J Biomech 2005;38:953-957.
35. van de Belt H, Neut D, Uges DR, Schenk W, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Surface roughness, porosity and wettability of gentamicin-loaded bone cements and their antibiotic release. Biomaterials 2000;21:1981-1987.
36. Penner MJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA. The in vitro elution characteristics of antibiotic-loaded CMW and Palacos-R bone cements. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:209-214.
37. Wroblewski BM, Esser M, Srigley DW. Release of gentamicin from bone cement. An ex-vivo study. Acta Orthop Scand 1986;57:413-414.
38. Armstrong MS, Spencer RF, Cunningham JL, Gheduzzi S, Miles AW, Learmonth ID. Mechanical characteristics of antibiotic-laden bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:688-690.
39. Lewis G, Janna S. Estimation of the optimum loading of an antibiotic powder in an acrylic bone cement. Acta Orthop 2006;77:622-627.
40. Småbrekke A, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacements: an analysis of 31,745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-2001. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:524-532.