Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 269-276

  Marrs, Brock ^a,b   Andrews, Rodney ^b   Rantell, Terry ^b   Pienkowski, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Bone cement; Carbon nanotubes; Dental prostheses; Fatigue

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BONE CEMENT; DENTAL PROSTHESES; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES;

ARTHROPLASTY;

MULTIWALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (MWCN);

ACRYLIC CEMENT; CARBON NANOTUBE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYMER; BIOMATERIAL; BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOTUBES, CARBON; PLIABILITY; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 33749042304     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30651     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA. Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 2003;114:257-265.
2. San Millan Ruiz D, Burkhardt K, Jean B, Muster M, Martin JB, Bouvier J. Pathology findings with acrylic implants. Bone 1999; 25:85S-90S.
3. Schurman D, Bloch D, Segal M, Tanner C. Conventional cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;240: 173-179.
4. Dorr LD, Kane TJ III, Conaty JP. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger. A 16-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:453-456.
5. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice D. Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States, 2nd ed. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1999.
6. Kotha SP, Li C, Schmid SR, Mason JJ. Fracture toughness of steel-fiber-reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 70:514-521.
7. Bowman AJ, Manley TR. The elimination of breakages in upper dentures by reinforcement with carbon fibre. Br Dent J 1984;156:87-89.
8. Stipho HD. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on some mechanical properties of autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:580-584.
9. Vallittu PK. Dimensional accuracy and stability of polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with metal wire or with continuous glass fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:617-621.
10. Manley TR, Bowman AJ, Cook M. Denture bases reinforced with carbon fibres. Br Dent J 1979;146:25.
11. Saha S, Pal S. Mechanical characterization of commercially made carbon-fiber-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:817-826.
12. Pourdeyhimi B, Wagner HD. Elastic and ultimate properties of acrylic bone cement reinforced with ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fibers. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:63-80.
13. Ramos V Jr, Runyan DA, Christensen LC. The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:94-96.
14. Samadzadeh A, Kugel G, Hurley E, Aboushala A. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations reinforced with plasma-treated woven polyethylene fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:447-450.
15. Uzun G, Hersek N, Tincer T. Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:616-620.
16. Wang Z, Mo S, Li Y, Zhang Q, Song Z. Mechanical property analysis of polyethylene fiber reinforced polymethyl methacrylate. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2004;22:62-64.
17. Pourdeyhimi B, Wagner H, Schwartz P. A comparison of mechanical properties of discontinuous Kevlar 29 fibre reinforced bone and dental cements. J Mater Sci 1986;21:4468-4474.
18. Polyzois GL, Andreopoulos AG, Lagouvardos PE. Acrylic resin denture repair with adhesive resin and metal wires: Effects on strength parameters. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:381-387.
19. Saha S, Kraay MJ. Bending properties of wire-reinforced bone cement for applications in spinal fixation. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;13:443-457.
20. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. The effects of centrifugation and titanium fiber reinforcement on fatigue failure mechanisms in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:299-307.
21. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. Flow intrusion characteristics and fracture properties of titanium-fibre-reinforced bone cement. Biomaterials 1998;19:1569-1577.
22. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. The fracture toughness of titanium-fiber-reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1599-1617.
23. Liu J, Rinzler AG, Dai H, Hafner JH, Bradley RK, Boul PJ. Fullerene pipes. Science 1998;280:1253-1256.
24. Smalley R. Nanotech growth. Res Dev 1999;41:34-36.
25. Burkins G. Clinton to propose more funding for research. Wall St J 2000;240:B10.
26. Falvo MR, Clary GJ, Taylor RM, 2nd, Chi V, Brooks FP, Jr., Washburn S. Bending and buckling of carbon nanotubes under large strain. Nature 1997;389:582-584.
27. Demczyk B, Wang Y, Cumings J, Hetman M, Han W, Zettl A. Direct mechanical measurement of the tensile strength and elastic modulus of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng A 2002;334:173-178.
28. Qian D, Dickey E, Andrews R, Rantell T. Load transfer and deformation mechanisms in carbon nanotube-polystyrene composites. Appl Phys Lett 2000;76:2868-2870.
29. Andrews R, Jacques D, Qian D, Rantell T. Multiwall carbon nanotubes: Synthesis and application. Acc Chem Res 2002;35: 1008-1017.
30. Qian D, Andrews R, Jacques D, Kichambare P, Lian G, Dickey EC. Low-temperature synthesis of large-area CNx nanotube arrays. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2003;3:93-97.
31. Hasenwinkel JM, Lautenschlager EP, Wixson RL, Gilbert JL. Effect of initiation chemistry on the fracture toughness, fatigue strength, and residual monomer content of a novel high-viscosity, two-solution acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:411-421.
32. Lewis G. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: State-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;66:457-486.
33. Lewis G, Janna S. Effect of test specimen cross-sectional shape on the in vitro fatigue life of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2003;24:4315-4321.
34. Lewis G, Janna S, Carroll M. Effect of test frequency on the in vitro fatigue life of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2003;24: 1111-1117.
35. Lewis G, Janna SI. Effect of fabrication pressure on the fatigue performance of Cemex XL acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:1415-1420.
36. Lewis G, Sadhasivini A. Estimation of the minimum number of test specimens for fatigue testing of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:4425-4432.
37. Murphy B, Prendergast P. On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of acrylic bone cement. Int J Fatigue 2002; 22:855-864.
38. Murphy B, Prendergast P. The relationship between stress, porosity, and nonlinear damage accumulation in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:646-654.
39. Johnson JA, Provan JW, Krygier JJ, Chan KH, Miller J. Fatigue of acrylic bone cement - effect of frequency and environment. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:819-831.
40. Dunne NJ, Orr JF, Mushipe MT, Eveleigh RJ. The relationship between porosity and fatigue characteristics of bone cements. Biomaterials 2003;24:239-245.
41. Lewis G, Janna S, Bhattaram A. Influence of the method of blending an antibiotic powder with an acrylic bone cement powder on physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the cured cement. Biomaterials 2005;26:4317-4325.
42. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:135-154.
43. Morscher EW, Wirz D. Current state of cement fixation in THR. Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68:1-12.
44. Ryan KP, Lipson SM, Drury A, Cadek M, Ruether M, O'Flaherty SM. Carbon-nanotube nucleated crystallinity in a conjugated polymer based composite. Chem Phys Lett 2004; 391:329-333.
45. Cadek M, Coleman J, Barron V, Hedicke K, Blau W. Morphological and mechanical properties of carbon-nanotube-reinforced semicrystalline and amorphous polymer composites. Appl Phys Lett 2002;81:5123-5125.
46. Coleman JN, Cadek M, Blake R, Nicolosi V, Ryan KP, Belton C. High-performance nanotube-reinforced plastics: Understanding the mechanism of strength increase. Adv Funct Mater 2004;14:791-798.
47. Ding W, Eitan A, Fisher F, Dikin D, Andrews R, Brinson L. Direct observation of polymer sheathing in carbon nanotube-polycarbonate composites. Nano Lett 2003;3:1593-1597.
48. Kim P, Shi L, Majumdar A, McEuen, P. Thermal transport measurements of individual multiwailed nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 2001;87:215502-1-215502-4.
49. Homsy CA, Tullos HS, Anderson MS, Diferrante, NM, King JW. Some physiological aspects of prosthesis stabilization with acrylic polymer. Clin Orthop 1972;83:317-328.
50. Linder L. Reaction of bone to the acute chemical trauma of bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:82-87.
51. Service RF. Nanotoxicology. Nanotechnology grows up. Science 2004;304:1732-1734.
52. Meng J, Kong H, Xu H, Song L, Wang C, Xie S. Improving the blood compatibility of polyurethane using carbon nanotubes as fillers and its implications to cardiovascular surgery. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:208-214.