Homoplastic evolution and host association of Eriophyoidea (Acari, Prostigmata) conflict with the morphological-based taxonomic system

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 185-198

  Li, Hao Sen ^a   Xue, Xiao Feng ^a   Hong, Xiao Yue ^a  

^a NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Eriophyoid mites; Host plant; Molecular phylogeny; Morphology; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ACARI; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HOST RANGE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

ACARI; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HOST SPECIFICITY; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84901911069     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Amrine J.W., Stasny T.A. Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata) of the World 1994, Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, Michigan.
2. Amrine J.W., Stasny T.A.H., Flechtmann C.H.W. Revised Keys to the World Genera of the Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata) 2003, Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, Michigan.
3. Boczek J.H. Generic key to Eriophyoidea. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk roln., Zesz. 1966, 65:177-187.
4. Boczek J.H., Shevchenko V.G., Davis R. Generic Key to World Fauna of Eriophyoid Mites 1989, Warsaw Agric. Univ. Press, Warsaw, Poland.
5. Britto E.P., Gondim M.G., Navia D., Flechtmann C.H. A new deuterogynous eriophyid mite (Acari: Eriophyidae) with dimorphic males from Caesalpinia echinata (Caesalpiniaceae) from Brazil: description and biological observations. Int. J. Acarol. 2008, 34:307-316.
6. Burger T.D., Shao R., Beati L., Miller H., Barker S.C. Phylogenetic analysis of ticks (Acari: Ixodida) using mitochondrial genomes and nuclear rRNA genes indicates that the genus Amblyomma is polyphyletic. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 64:45-55.
7. Campbell B.C., Steffen-Campbell J.D., Werren J.H. Phylogeny of the Nasonia species complex (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) inferred from an internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) and 28S rDNA sequences. Insect Mol. Biol. 1994, 2:225-237.
8. Dabert J., Ehrnsberger R., Dabert M. Glaucalges tytonis sp. n. (Analgoidea, Xolalgidae) from the barn owl Tyto alba (Strigiformes, Tytonidae): compiling morphology with DNA barcode data for taxon descriptions in mites (Acari). Zootaxa 2008, 41-52.
9. Dabert M., Witalinski W., Kazmierski A., Olszanowski Z., Dabert J. Molecular phylogeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 56:222-241.
10. de Lillo E., Skoracka A. What's "cool" on eriophyoid mites?. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 51:3-30.
11. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:113.
12. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 2004, 32:1792-1797.
13. Hillis D.M., Dixon M.T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 1991, 66:411-453.
14. Hong X.Y., Zhang Z.Q. A cladistic analysis of the Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata): tests of monophyly of families. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 1996, 1:107-122.
15. Hong X.Y., Zhang Z.Q. A phylogenetic study of the tribe Cecidophyini Keifer (Acari: Eriophyidae). Or. Ins. 1996, 30:279-300.
16. Hong X.Y., Zhang Z.Q. Systematics and generic relationships of the mites in the subfamily Diptilomiopinae (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae). Syst. Entomol. 1997, 22:313-331.
17. Huang K.W., Huang T. A study on numerical taxonomy of eriophyoid mites (Acarina: Eriophyoidea). Bull. Natl. Museum Nat. Sci. 1990, 2:273-279.
18. Klompen H., Lekveishvili M., Black W.C.T. Phylogeny of parasitiform mites (Acari) based on rRNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43:936-951.
19. Krantz G.W. A Manual of Acarology 1978, Oregon State University Book Stores, Oregon, Corvallis. second ed.
20. Kuang H.H., Xie M.C., Gong G.J. A preliminary study on the relationship between the families of Eriophyoidea. A. Zootaxon. Sin. 1992, 17:294-298.
21. Kuang H.H., Lin F.P., Zhao J. The karotype analysis and the relationship in eriophyoid mites. A. Zootaxon. Sin. 1995, 20:420-425.
22. Lindquist E.E. Phylogenetic relationships. Eriophyoid Mites-Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests 1996, vol. 6:301-327. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E.E. Lindquist, M.W. Sabelis, J. Bruin (Eds.).
23. Lindquist E.E., Amrine J.W. Systematics, diagnoses for major taxa, and keys to families and genera with species on plant of economic importance. Eriophyoid Mites-Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests 1996, vol. 6:33-87. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E.E. Lindquist, M.W. Sabelis, J. Bruin (Eds.).
24. Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W., Bruin J. Eriophyoid Mites-Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests 1996, vol. 6. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
25. Lingquist E.E., Oldfield G.N. Evolution of eriophyoid mites in relation to their host plant. Eriophyoid Mites-Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests 1996, vol. 6:277-300. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E.E. Lindquist, M.W. Sabelis, J. Bruin (Eds.).
26. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2011. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 2.75. http://www.mesquiteproject.org.
27. Manson D.C.M., Oldfield G.N. Life forms, deuterogyny, diapause and seasonal development. Eriophyoid Mites-Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests 1996, vol. 6:173-183. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E.E. Lindquist, M.W. Sabelis, J. Bruin (Eds.).
28. Miller A.D., Skoracka A., Navia D., Mendonca R.S., Szydlo W., Schultz M.B., Michael Smith C., Truol G., Hoffmann A.A. Phylogenetic analyses reveal extensive cryptic speciation and host specialization in an economically important mite taxon. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66:928-940.
29. Mott T., Vieites D.R. Molecular phylogenetics reveals extreme morphological homoplasy in Brazilian worm lizards challenging current taxonomy. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 51:190-200.
30. Navajas M., Navia D. DNA-based methods for eriophyoid mite studies: review, critical aspects, prospects and challenges. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 51:257-271.
31. Nwekirk R.A., Keifer H.H. Eriophyoidea: synoptic keys to groups and genera, Appendix 3. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants 1975, 562-587. University of California Press, Berkeley. J.R. Jeppson, H.H. Keifer, E.W. Baker (Eds.).
32. Oldfield G.N. Diversity and host plant specificity. Eriophyoid Mites-Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, World Crop Pests 1996, vol. 6:199-216. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. E.E. Lindquist, M.W. Sabelis, J. Bruin (Eds.).
33. Pachl P., Domes K., Schulz G., Norton R.A., Scheu S., Schaefer I., Maraun M. Convergent evolution of defense mechanisms in oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida) shows no "ghosts of predation past". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 65:412-420.
34. Padial J.M., Castroviejo-Fisher S., Kohler J., Vila C., Chaparro J.C., De la Riva I. Deciphering the products of evolution at the species level: the need for an integrative taxonomy. Zool. Scr. 2009, 38:431-447.
35. Padial J.M., Miralles A., De la Riva I., Vences M. The integrative future of taxonomy. Front. Zool. 2010, 7:16.
36. Perkins E.M., Donnellan S.C., Bertozzi T., Chisholm L.A., Whittington I.D. Looks can deceive: molecular phylogeny of a family of flatworm ectoparasites (Monogenea: Capsalidae) does not reflect current morphological classification. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 52:705-714.
37. Posada D. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
38. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2007. Tracer v1.4. http://www.beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
39. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:539-542.
40. Schaffer S., Koblmuller S., Pfingstl T., Sturmbauer C., Krisper G. Ancestral state reconstruction reveals multiple independent evolution of diagnostic morphological characters in the "Higher Oribatida" (Acari), conflicting with current classification schemes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:246.
41. Schevchenko V.G. The current state of nomenclature of Tetrapodili (Acari). Plant Protect. 1974, 12:37-38.
42. Schmidt A.R., Jancke S., Lindquist E.E., Ragazzi E., Roghi G., Nascimbene P.C., Schmidt K., Wappler T., Grimaldi D.A. Arthropods in amber from the Triassic Period. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109:14796-14801.
43. Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:1246-1247.
44. Silvestro D., Michalak I. RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Div. Evol. 2012, 12:335-337.
45. Skoracka A., Dabert M. The cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Eriophyoidea) is a complex of species: evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Bul. Entomol. Res. 2010, 100:263-272.
46. Skoracka A., Smith L., Oldfield G., Cristofaro M., Amrine J.W. Host-plant specificity and specialization in eriophyoid mites and their importance for the use of eriophyoid mites as biocontrol agents of weeds. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 51:93-113.
47. Skoracka A., Kuczyński L., de Mendonca R., Dabert M., Szydło W., Knihinicki D., Truol G., Navia D. Cryptic species within the wheat curl mite Aceria tosichella (Keifer) (Acari, Eriophyoidea) revealed by mitochondrial, nuclear and morphometric data. Invertebr. Syst. 2012, 26:417-433.
48. Skoracka A., Kuczyński L., Szydło W., Rector B. The wheat curl mite Aceria tosichella (Acari: Eriophyoidea) is a complex of cryptic lineages with divergent host ranges: evidence from molecular and plant bioassay data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2013, 109:165-180.
49. Skoracka A., Kuczyński L., Rector B., Amrine J.W. Wheat curl mite and dry bulb mite: untangling a taxonomic conundrum through a multidisciplinary approach. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2014, 111:421-436.
50. Soller R., Wohltmann A., Witte H., Blohm D. Phylogenetic relationships within terrestrial mites (Acari: Prostigmata, Parasitengona) inferred from comparative DNA sequence analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001, 18:47-53.
51. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum Likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
52. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.08b. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
53. Urban J.M., Cryan J.R. Entomologically famous, evolutionarily unexplored: the first phylogeny of the lanternfly family Fulgoridae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 50:471-484.
54. Virgilio M., De Meyer M., White I.M., Backejau T. African Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae: molecular data and host plant associations do not corroborate morphology based classifications. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 51:531-539.
55. Whiting M.F., Carpenter J.C., Wheeler Q.D., Wheeler W.C. The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:1-68.
56. Zhang Z.Q. Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 2011, 2148:129-138.
57. Zhang F., Chen Z., Dong R.R., Deharveng L., Stevens M.I., Huang Y.H., Zhu C.D. Molecular phylogeny reveals independent origins of body scales in Entomobryidae (Hexapoda: Collembola). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2014, 70:231-239.