Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2013, Pages

  Sayogo, Djoko Sigit ^a   Pardo, Theresa A ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Data management; Data sharing; Open data initiative; Research datasets

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873055989     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50(2):179-211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
2. Ardichvili A., Page V., Wentling T. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 2003, 7(1):64-77.
3. Arzberger P., Schroeder P., Beaulieu A., Bowker G., Casey K., Laaksonen L., et al. Promoting access to public research data for scientific, economic, and social development. Data Science Journal 2004, 3:135-152.
4. Ball A. Review of data management lifecycle models. Research Report, Bath, UK 2012.
5. Barnes D.M. Meeting on AIDS drugs turns into open forum. Science 1987, 237(4820):1287.
6. Birnholtz J.P., Bietz M.J. Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work 2003, 339-348.
7. Blumenthal D., Campbell E.G., Anderson M.S., Causino N., Louis K.S. Withholding research results in academic life science. JAMA:The Journal of the American Medical Association 1997, 277(15):1224-1228.
8. Bock G., Zmud R.W., Kim Y., Lee J. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly - Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management 2005, 29:87-111.
9. Borgman C.L. Research data: Who will share what, with whom, when, and why? 2010, September, Paper presented at the 5th China-North America Library Conference, Beijing, Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/borgman/238.
10. Bos N., Zimmerman A., Olson J., Yew J., Yerkie J., Dahl E., et al. From shared databases to communities of practice: A taxonomy of collaboratories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007, 12(2):652-672.
11. Campbell E.G., Clarridge B.R., Gokhale M., Birenbaum L., Hilgartner S., Holtzman N.A., et al. Data withholding in academic genetics. JAMA:The Journal of the American Medical Association 2002, 287(4):473-480.
12. Ceci S.J. Scientists' attitudes toward data sharing. Science, Technology & Human Values 1988, 13(1/2):45-52.
13. Ceci S.J., Walker E. Private archives and public needs. American Psychologist 1983, 38(4):414.
14. DataONE (n.d.). Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http://www.dataone.org/.
15. Dawes S.S. Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1996, 15(3):377-394.
16. Dawes S.S. Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(4):377-383.
17. Dawes S.S. Information policy meta-principles: Stewardship and usefulness. System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on 2010, 1-10.
18. Ding W.W., Levin S.G., Stephan P.E., Winkler A.E. The impact of information technology on academic scientists' productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Science 2010, 56(9):1439.
19. Emirbayer M., Goodwin J. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. The American Journal of Sociology 1994, 99(6):1411-1454.
20. Hey A.J.G., Tansley S., Tolle K.M. The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery 2009, Microsoft Research Redmond, WA.
21. Hinrichs H., Aden T. An ISO 9001: 2000 compliant quality management system for data integration in data warehouse systems. International Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses 2001.
22. Hook L., Santhana-Vannan S.K., Beaty T.W., Cook R.B., Wilson B.E. Best practices for preparing environmental data sets to share and archive 2010, Manuscript, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
23. Kaye J., Heeney C., Hawkins N., de Vries J., Boddington P. Data sharing in genomics-Re-shaping scientific practice. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009, 10(5):331-335.
24. Koslow S.H. Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data?. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(9):863.
25. Koslow S.H. Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3(4):311-313.
26. Krueger A.O. The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review 1974, 64(3):291-303.
27. Kuipers T., van der Hoeven J. Insight into digital preservation of research output in Europe (Survey Report No. D3.4). PARSE Insight: PARSE Insight 2009, (Retrieved from http://www.parse-insight.eu/downloads/PARSE-Insight_D3-4_SurveyReport_final_hq.pdf).
28. Lin H. Impact of organizational support on organizational intention to facilitate knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 2006, 4:26-35.
29. Michener W.K. Meta-information concepts for ecological data management. Ecological Informatics 2006, 1(1):3-7.
30. Nelkin D. Intellectual property: The control of scientific information. Science 1982, 216(4547):704-708.
31. Nelson B. Data sharing: Empty archives. Nature 2009, 461.
32. Pardo T.A., Cresswell A.M., Dawes S.S., Burke G.B. Modeling the social and technical processes of interorganizational information integration. Proceedings of the Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences 2004, IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii.
33. Parr C.S., Cummings M.P. Data sharing in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005, 20(7):362-363.
34. Piwowar H.A., Chapman W.W. Public sharing of research data sets: A pilot study of associations. Journal of informetrics 2010, 4(2):148-156.
35. Postle B.R., Shapiro L.A., Biesanz J.C. On having one's data shared. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(6):838-840.
36. Reichman O., Jones M.B., Schildhauer M.P. Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science 2011, 331(6018):703.
37. Rodriguez V. Access to data and material for research: Putting empirical evidence into perspective. New Genetics and Society 2009, 28(1):67-86.
38. Savage C.J., Vickers A.J. Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PLoS One 2009, 4(9):e7078.
39. Schofield P.N., Bubela T., Weaver T., Portilla L., Brown S.D., Hancock J.M., et al. Post-publication sharing of data and tools. Nature 2009, 461(7261):171-173.
40. Scott Long J., Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA 2006, Stata Press, College Station, TX.
41. Smith K., Seligman L., Swarup V. Everybody share: The challenge of data-sharing systems. Computer 2008, 41(9):54-61.
42. Stanley B., Stanley M. Data sharing. Law and Human Behavior 1988, 12(2):173-180.
43. Strong D.M., Lee Y.W., Wang R.Y. Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM 1997, 40(5):103-110.
44. Tenopir C., Allard S., Douglass K., Aydinoglu A.U., Wu L., Read E., et al. Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLoS One 2011, 6(6):e21101.
45. Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications 2004, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
46. Tucker J. Motivating subjects: Data sharing in cancer research 2009, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
47. Van House N.A., Butler M.H., Schiff L.R. Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning data sets. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1998, 335-343.
48. Vickers A. Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials 2006, 7(1):15.
49. Vision T.J. Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing. BioScience 2010, 60(5):330-331.
50. Vogel L. Opening the gates on US government data. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2011, 183(7):E377-E378.
51. Wellman B., Berkowitz S.D. Social structures: A network approach 1988, Vol. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press.
52. Zhang J., Dawes S.S. Expectations and perceptions of benefits, barriers, and success in public sector knowledge networks. Public Performance & Management Review 2006, 29(4):433-466.
53. Zimmerman A. Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries 2007, 7(1):5-16.
54. Zimmerman A. New knowledge from old data. Science, Technology & Human Values 2008, 33(5):631-652.