The analysis of vehicle crash injury-severity data: A Markov switching approach with road-segment heterogeneity

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 67, Issue , 2014, Pages 109-128

  Xiong, Yingge ^a   Tobias, Justin L ^b   Mannering, Fred L ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data augmentation; Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation; Markov switching models; Ordered response model; Random parameter models

Indexed keywords

CHAINS; CRASHWORTHINESS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SWITCHING;

DATA AUGMENTATION; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; MARKOV SWITCHING MODELS; ORDERED RESPONSE MODELS; RANDOM PARAMETER MODEL;

ACCIDENTS;

ALGORITHM; HETEROGENEITY; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; RANDOM WALK METHOD; ROAD TRANSPORT;

EID: 84901774487     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Albert J., Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993, 88(422):669-679.
2. Albert J., Chib S. Sequential ordinal modeling with applications to survival data. Biometrics 2001, 57(3):829-836.
3. Allenby G., Arora N., Ginter J. On the heterogeneity of demand. Journal of Marketing Research 1998, 35(3):384-389.
4. Anastasopoulos P., Mannering F. An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit models using crash- and non-crash-specific injury data. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011, 43(3):1140-1147.
5. Bhat C. An analysis of evening commute stop-making behavior using repeated choice observations from a multi-day survey. Transportation Research Part B 1999, 33(7):495-510.
6. Brooks P., Gelman A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1998, 7(4):434-455.
7. Bujosa A., Riera A., Hicks R. Combining discrete and continuous representation of preference heterogeneity: a latent class approach. Environment and Resource Economics 2010, 4(7):477-493.
8. Castro M., Paleti R., Bhat C. A spatial generalized ordered response model to examine highway crash injury severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2013, 52:188-203.
9. Chen M.-H., Dey D. Bayesian analysis for correlated ordinal data models. Generalized Linear Models: A Bayesian Perspective 2000, 133-157. Marcel Dekker, New York. D.K. Dey, S.K. Ghosh, B.K. Mallick (Eds.).
10. Chib S. Calculating posterior distributions and modal estimates in Markov mixture models. Journal of Econometrics 1996, 75(1):79-97.
11. Chib S. Estimation and comparison of multiple change-point models. Journal of Econometrics 1998, 86(2):221-241.
12. Chib S., Carlin B. On MCMC sampling in hierarchical longitudinal models. Statistics and Computing 1999, 9(1):17-26.
13. Chopin N. Inference and model choice for sequentially ordered hidden Markov models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2007, 69(2):269-284.
14. Cowles M., Carlin B. Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review. Journal of American Statistical Association 1996, 91(434):883-904.
15. Depaire B., Wets G., Vanhoof K. Traffic accident segmentation by means of latent class clustering. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2008, 40(4):1257-1266.
16. Dueker M. Conditional heteroscedasticity in qualitative response models of time series: a Gibbs sampling approach to the bank prime rate. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1999, 17(4):466-472.
17. El Adlouni S., Favre A., Bobée B. Comparison of methodologies to assess the convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006, 50(10):2685-2701.
18. Elliott M., Shope J. Use of a Bayesian changepoint model to estimate effects of a graduated driver's licensing program. Journal of Data Science 2003, 1(1):43-63.
19. Eluru N., Bhat C., Hensher D. A mixed generalized ordered response model for examining pedestrian and bicyclist injury severity level in traffic crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2008, 40(3):1033-1054.
20. Eluru N., Bagherib M., Miranda-Morenoa L., Fu L. A latent class modeling approach for identifying vehicle driver injury severity factors at highway-railway crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2012, 47:119-127.
21. Frühwirth-Schnatter S., Tüchler R., Otter T. Bayesian analysis of the heterogeneity model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2004, 22(1):2-15.
22. Gelman A., Rubin D. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 1992, 7(4):457-472.
23. Gelman A., Carlin J., Stern H., Rubin D. Bayesian Data Analysis 2004, Chapman & Hall, London. second ed.
24. Gerlach R., Carter C., Kohn R. Efficient Bayesian inference for dynamic mixture models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000, 95(451):819-828.
25. Geweke J., Amisano G. Hierarchical Markov normal mixture models with applications to financial asset returns. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2011, 26(1):1-29.
26. Green W., Hensher D. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B 2003, 37(8):681-698.
27. Greene W., Hensher D. Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model. Applied Economics 2013, 45(14):1897-1902.
28. Hamilton J. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 1989, 57(2):357-384.
29. Hamilton J. Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics 1990, 45(1-2):39-70.
30. Hamilton J. Regime-switching models. New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 2005, Palgrave McMillan Ltd. second ed. S. Durlauf, L. Blume (Eds.).
31. Hensher D., Greene W. Mixed logit models: state of practice. Transportation 2003, 30(2):133-176.
32. Hirose, K., 2012. Markov Switching Analysis of Binary Panel Data. University of Chicago, Working Paper.
33. Holan S., Davis G., Wildhaber M., DeLonay A., Papoulias D. Hierarchical Bayesian Markov switching models with application to predicting spawning success of shovelnose sturgeon. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) 2009, 58(1):47-64.
34. Ihs, A., Gustafsson, M., Eriksson, O., Wiklund, M., Sjögren, L., 2011. Road user effect models - the influence of rut depth on traffic safety, VTI rapport 731A. Prepared for the Finnish Transport Agency.
35. Jeliazkov I., Graves J., Kutzbach M. Fitting and comparison of models for multivariate ordinal outcomes. Advances in Econometrics: Bayesian Econometrics 2008, 23(C):115-156.
36. Johnson V., Albert J. Ordinal Data Modeling 1999, Springer, New York.
37. Kobayashi K., Kaito K., Lethanh N. A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(4):544-561.
38. Lenk P., DeSarbo W. Bayesian inference for finite mixture of generalized linear models with random effects. Psychometrika 2000, 65(1):93-119.
39. Li M., Tobias J. Bayesian analysis of structural effects in an ordered equation system. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 2006, 10(4):1-22.
40. Li M., Tobias J. Bayesian analysis of treatment effects in an ordered potential outcomes model. Advances in Econometrics 2007, 21:57-91.
41. Malyshkina N., Mannering F. Markov switching multinomial logit model: an application to accident-injury severities. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009, 41(4):829-838.
42. Malyshkina N., Mannering F. Zero-state Markov switching count-data models: an empirical assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2010, 42(1):122-130.
43. Malyshkina N., Mannering F., Tarko A. Markov switching negative binomial models: an application to vehicle accident frequencies. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009, 41(2):217-226.
44. Mannering F., Bhat C. Analytic methods in highway-accident research: methodological frontier and future directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research 2014, 1:1-22.
45. Mannering F., Washburn S. Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis 2013, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. fifth ed.
46. Mardia K., Kent J., Bibby J. Multivariate Analysis 1979, Academic Press, Inc., London.
47. McFadden D., Train K. Mixed MNL models of discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2000, 15(5):447-470.
48. Milton J., Shankar V., Mannering F. Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2008, 40(1):260-266.
49. Morgan A., Mannering F. The effects of road-surface conditions, age, and gender on driver-injury severities. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011, 43(5):1852-1863.
50. Nandram B., Chen M.-H. Reparameterizing the generalized linear model to accelerate Gibbs sampler convergence. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 1996, 54(1-3):129-144.
51. Park J. Unified method for dynamic and cross-sectional heterogeneity: introducing hidden Markov panel models. American Journal of Political Science 2012, 56(4):1040-1054.
52. Savolainen P., Mannering F., Lord D., Quddus M. The statistical analysis of crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2011, 43(5):1666-1676.
53. Scott S. Bayesian methods for hidden Markov models: recursive computing in the 21st century. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2002, 97(457):337-351.
54. Scott S., James G., Sugar C. Hidden Markov models for longitudinal comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2005, 100(470):359-369.
55. Shen J. Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data. Applied Economics 2009, 41(22):2915-2924.
56. Spiegelhalter D., Best N., Carlin B., Van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2002, 64(4):583-639.
57. Srinivasan K. Injury severity analysis with variable and correlated thresholds: ordered mixed logit formulation. Transportation Research Record 2002, 1784:132-142.
58. van Dyk D., Meng X.-L. The art of data augmentation (with discussion). Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2001, 10(1):1-111.
59. Verbeke G., Lesaffre E. A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996, 91(433):217-221.
60. Winston C., Maheshri V., Mannering F. An exploration of the offset hypothesis using disaggregate data: the case of airbags and antilock brakes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2006, 32(2):83-99.
61. Xiong Y., Mannering F. The heterogeneous effects of guardian supervision on adolescent driver-injury severities: a finite-mixture random-parameters approach. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 49:39-54.
62. Yau K., Lee A., Ng A. Finite mixture regression model with random effects: application to neonatal hospital length of stay. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2003, 41(28):359-366.