An analysis of evening commute stop-making behavior using repeated choice observations from a multi-day survey

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 495-510

  Bhat, Chandra ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Heteroscedasticity; Maximum simulated likelihood method; Ordered response logit; Random coefficients; Transportation control measures; Unobserved heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

HETEROSCEDASTICITY; ORDERED-RESPONSE LOGIT; TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES; UNOBSERVED HETEROGENEITY;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

COMMUTING; METHODOLOGY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CALIFORNIA; SAN FRANCISCO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032835778     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00003-X     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adiv A. The structure of the work-trip based on analysis of trip diaries in the San Francisco bay area. Carpenter S., Jones P. Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis. 1983;335-349 Gower, Aldershot, UK.
2. Agyemang-Duah K., Hall F.L. Spatial transferability of an ordered response model of trip generation. Transportation Research. 31A:1997;389-402.
3. Agyemang-Duah, K., Anderson, W.P., Hall, F.L. 1995. Trip generation for shopping travel. Transportation Research Record, 1493, 12-20.
4. Bianco, M.J., Lawson, C., 1996. Trip chaining, childcare and personal safety: critical issues in women's travel behavior. Paper presented at the Second National Conference on Women's Travel Issues, October, Baltimore, MD.
5. Bhat C.R. Work travel mode choice and number of nonwork commute stops. Transportation Research. 31B:1997;41-54.
6. Bhat, C.R., 1998a. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling. Transportation Research, 32A, 495-507.
7. Bhat, C.R., 1998b. Modeling the commute activity-travel pattern of workers: formulation and empirical analysis. Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Auston, TX.
8. Bhat, C.R., Sujit Singh, 1998. A Comprehensive Daily Activity-Travel Generation Model System for Workers. Transportation Research, in press.
9. Chamberlain G. Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies. 47:1980;225-238.
10. Davidson D. Impact of suburban employee trip chaining on transportation demand management. Transportation Research Record. 1321:1991;82-89.
11. Diggle P.J., Liang K-Y. Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 1994;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
12. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. 1997;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Hamed M.M., Mannering F.L. Modeling travelers' postwork activity involvement: toward a new methodology. Transportation Science. 27(4):1993;381-394.
14. Hajivassiliou, V.A., Ruud, P.A., 1994. Classical estimation methods for LDV models using simulation. In: Engle, R.F., McFadden, D.L. (Eds), Handbook of Econometrics, pp. 2383-2441.
15. Hsiao C. Analysis of Panel Data. 1986;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Jones, P.M., Koppelman, F.S. and Orfeuil, J.P., 1993. Activity analysis: state of the art and future directions. In Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Gower, Aldershot, UK, pp. 34-55.
17. Jou, R.-C., Mahmassani, H.S. 1997. Comparative analysis of day-to-day trip chaining behavior of urban commuters in two cities. Transportation Research Record, in press.
18. Kitamura R., Yamamoto T., Fujii S., Sampath S. A discrete-continuous analysis of time allocation to two types of discretionary activities which accounts for unobserved heterogeneity. Lesort J.B. Transportation and Traffic Theory. 1996;431-453 Elsevier, Oxford.
19. Kondo K., Kitamura R. Time-space constraints and the formation of trip chains. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 17:1987;49-65.
20. Lee L.-F. On the efficiency of methods of simulated moments and maximum simulated likelihood estimation of discrete response models. Econometric Theory. 8(4):1992;518-552.
21. Lockwood, P.B., Demetsky, M.J., 1994. Nonwork travel - a study of changing behavior. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January, Washington, DC.
22. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. McKelvey R.D., Zavoina W. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 4:1975;103-120.
24. McMillen, D.P., 1995. Spatial effects in probit models: a Monte Carlo investigation. In: Anselin, L., Florax, R.J.G.M. (Eds.), New Directions in Spatial Econometrics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
25. Mensah J. Journey to work and job search characteristics of the urban poor: a gender analysis of a survey data from Edmonton, Alberta. Transportation. 22:1995;1-19.
26. Nishii K., Kondo K., Kitamura R. Empirical analysis of trip chaining behavior. Transportation Research Record. 1203:1988;48-59.
27. Purvis, C.L., 1994. Changes in regional travel characteristics and travel time budgets in the san francisco bay area: 1960-1990. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January, Washington, DC.
28. Purvis, C.L., 1996. Estimation of home-based work mode choice models, Technical Memorandum in San Francisco Bay Area 1990 Travel Demand Model Development Project, Planning Section, Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
29. Revelt, D., Train, K., 1997. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level, Review of Economics and Statistics, in press.
30. Strathman J.G., Dueker K.J., Davis J.S. Effects of household structure and selected travel characteristics on trip chaining. Transportation. 21:1994;23-45.
31. Swait, J., Adamowicz W. 1996 The effect of choice environment and task demands on consumer behavior: discriminating between contribution and confusion. Working paper, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Canada.
32. Train, K. 1997. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics, in press.
33. White, E.H. and Company, Inc., 1991. 1990 bay area travel survey: final report. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, CA, submitted for publication.