Conceptualizing the intervening roles of identity in communication effects: The prism model

Identity and Communication: New Agendas in Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 168-188

  Comello, Maria Leonora Nori G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901696251     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203557105     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 98–106.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
4. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. in D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Berger, J. A., & Rand, L. (2008). Shifting signals to help health: Using identity-signaling to reduce risky health behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 509–518.
6. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
7. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.
8. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152.
9. Cesario, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Making message recipients “feel right”: How nonverbal cues can increase persuasion. Psychological Science, 19, 415–420.
10. Chang, C. (2002). Self-congruency as a cue in different advertising-processing contexts. Communication Research, 29(5), 503–536.
11. Chang, C. (2005). Ad-self-congruency effects: Self-enhancing cognitive and affective mechanisms. Psychology and Marketing, 22(11), 887–910.
12. Comello, M. L. G. (2009). William James on “possible Selves”: Implications for studying identity in communication contexts. Communication Theory, 19(3), 337–350.
13. Comello, M. L. G., & Slater, M. D. (2011). The effects of drug-prevention messages on the accessibility of identity-related constructs. Journal of Health Communication, 16(5), 458–469. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.546485
14. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15.
15. Evans, W., Wasserman, J., Bertolotti, E., & Martino, S. (2002). Branding behavior: The strategy behind the truth campaign. Social Marketing Quarterly, 8(3), 17–29.
16. Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M. C. (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13(2), 164–183.
17. Galinsky, A. D., Wang, C. S., & Ku, G. (2008). Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 404–419.
18. Harwood, J., & Roy, A. (2005). Social identity theory and mass communication research. in J. Harwood & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 189–211). New York: Lang.
19. Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Hayes, A. F. (2011). MODMED version 3.1. School of Communication, The Ohio State University. Available at http://www.afhayes.com/spss-sas-and-mplus-macros-and-code.html
21. Hogg, M. A., & Reid, A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30.
22. James, W. (1981). The consciousness of self. in The principles of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 279–379). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890)
23. Maibach, E., Flora, J. A., & Nass, C. (1991). Changes in self-efficacy and health behavior in response to a minimal contact community health campaign. Health Communication, 3(1), 1–15.
24. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum.
25. Markus, H. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.
26. Markus, H. R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
27. Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Kanouse, D. E., Elliott, M., & Berry, S. H. (2005). Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television’s sexual content and adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 914–924.
28. McGuire, W. J. & McGuire, C. V. (1988). Content and process in the experience of self. in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 97–144). New York: Academic Press.
29. Morton, T. A., & Duck, J. M. (2000). Social identity and media dependency in the gay community: The prediction of safe sex attitudes. Communication Research, 27(4), 438–460.
30. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246.
31. O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274.
32. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
33. Reed, M. B., & Aspinwall, L. G. (1998). Self-affirmation reduces biased processing of health-risk information. Motivation & Emotion, 22(2), 99–132.
34. Resnicow, K., Baranowski, T., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Braithwaite, R. L. (1999). Cultural sensitivity in public health: Defined and demystified. Ethnicity & Disease, 9(1), 10–21.
35. Reid, S. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). A self-categorization explanation for the third-person effect. Human Communication Research, 31(1), 129–161.
36. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. R. D. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 97–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Sherman, D. A. K., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1046–1058.
38. Slater, M. D. (2006). Specification and misspecification of theoretical foundations and logic models for health communication campaigns. Health Communication, 20(2), 149–157.
39. Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303.
40. Steele, C. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302.
41. Swann, W. B., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Self and identity. in S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 589–628). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
42. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. in S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson.
43. Tao, C., & Bucy, E. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 397–426.
44. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170.
45. Tracy, S. J. & Trethewey, A. (2005). Fracturing the real-self fake-self dichotomy: Moving toward “Crystallized” organizational discourses and identities. Communication Theory, 15(2), 168–195.
46. Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. in J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 42–67). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
47. Wheeler, S. C., Demarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2005). The roles of the self in priming-to-behavior effects. in A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. S. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 245–271). New York: Psychology Press.
48. Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime-to-behavior effects: The active-self account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(3), 234–261.
49. Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2008). A match made in the laboratory: Persuasion and matches to primed traits and stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1035–1047.
50. Wheeler, S. C., Petty, R. E., & Bizer, G. Y. (2005). Self-schema matching and attitude change: Situational and dispositional determinants of message elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 787–797.
51. Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM). Journal of Personality, 74(3), 779–810.