Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM)

Journal of Personality

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 779-810

  Wood, Dustin ^a,b   Roberts, Brent W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UniversityofIllinois ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646713453     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00392.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
2. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 154-197). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5. Bing, M. N., Whanger, J. C., Davison, H. K., & VanHook, J. B. (2004). Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 150-157.
6. Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 187-219.
7. Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (1999). Personality continuity and change across the life course. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 300-326). New York: Guilford Press.
8. Cervone, D. (1999). Bottom-up explanation in personality psychology: The case of cross-situational coherence. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coher ence of personality: Social-cognitive hases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 303-341). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships (pp. 53-90). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
10. Donahue, E. M., & Harary, K. (1998). The patterned inconsistency of traits: Mapping the differential effects of social roles on self-perceptions of the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 610-619.
11. Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of human personality. New York: Methuen.
12. Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.
13. Fourneir, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2002). Social rank strategies in hierarchical relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 434-450.
14. Funder, D. C. (1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31-39.
15. Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197-221.
16. Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self : Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
17. Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 124-136.
18. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psvchology, 60, 159-170.
19. Heller, D., Watson, D., & Hies, R. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin. 130, 574-600.
20. Hofstee, W. K., deRaad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
21. Hogan, R. T., & Roberts, B. W. (2000). A socioanalytic perspective on person-environment interaction. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. H. Price (Eds.), New directions in person-environment psychology (pp. 1-24). Mahway, NJ: Earlbaum.
22. Hull, J. G. (2002). Modeling the structure of self-knowledge and the dynamics of self-regulation. In A. Tesser, D. A. Stapel, & J. V. Wood (Eds.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 173-206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
24. Jones, W. H., Adams, J. M., Monroe, P. R., & Berry, J. O. (1995). A psychometric exploration of marital satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 923-932.
25. Kilhstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.
26. Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1983), Work and personality: An inquiry into social stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Linville, P. W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663-676.
28. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
29. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
30. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380.
31. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Yeung, A. S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 154-157.
32. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal models: The direction of causality in multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept models. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 509-527.
33. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99-113.
34. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
35. Neyer, F. J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001). Personality-relationship transaction in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1190-1204.
36. Olkin, I., & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlation redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155-164.
37. Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Global and specific relational models in the experience of social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 613-631.
38. Roberts, B. W. (1997). Plaster or plasticity: Are adult work experiences associated with personality change in women? Journal of Personality, 65, 205-232.
39. Roberts, B. W., & Bogg, T. (2004). A longitudinal study of the relationships between conscientiousness and the social environmental factors and substance use behaviors that influence health. Journal of Personality, 72, 325-353.
40. Roberts, B. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 582-593.
41. Roberts, B. W., & Donahue, E. M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality, 62, 199-218.
42. Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (in press). The cumulative continuity model of personality trait development. In D. Mroczek & T. Little (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). It's not just who you're with, it's who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 925-964.
44. Sarbin, T. R. (1964). Role theoretical interpretation of psychological change. In P. Worchel & D. Byrne (Eds.), Personality change (pp. 176-219). New York: John Wiley.
45. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
46. Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Steirwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame of reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607-620.
47. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
48. Showers, C. J. (2002). Integration and compartmentalization: A model of self-structure and self-change. In D. Cervone, Daniel, & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 271-291). New York: Guilford Press.
49. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
50. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2003). A sociological approach to self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. E. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 128-152). New York: Guilford Press.
51. Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 311-378). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Tellegen, A. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence, and assessment. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Personality and psychopathology (Vol. II, pp. 10-35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53. Vaidya, J. G., Gray, E. K., Haig, J., & Watson, D. (2002). On the temporal stability of personality: Evidence for differential stability and the role of life experiences. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 1469-1484.
54. Wood, D. (2004). [Big Five scale correlations in a student sample]. Unpublished raw data.