The effects of drug-prevention messages on the accessibility of identity-related constructs

Journal of Health Communication

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 458-469

  Comello, Maria Leonora G ^a   Slater, Michael D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; REACTION TIME; SELF CONCEPT;

ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MARIJUANA ABUSE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; REACTION TIME; SELF CONCEPT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957484132     PISSN: 10810730     EISSN: 10870415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546485     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
2. Cappella, J. N. (2006). Integrating message effects and behavior change theories: Organizing comments and unanswered questions. Journal of Communication, 56, S265-S279. (Pubitemid 44165225)
3. Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Comello, M. L. G. (2009). William James on "possible selves": Implications for studying identity in communication contexts. Communication Theory, 19, 337-350.
5. Comello, M. L. G. (In press). Characterizing drug non-users as distinctive in prevention messages: Implications of optimal distinctiveness theory. Health Communication.
6. Czyzewska, M., & Ginsburg, J. (2007). Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 114-127. (Pubitemid 44708491)
7. DeMarree, K. G., Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Priming a new identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 657-671.
8. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Oxford, U.K.: Norton.
9. Evans, W., Price, S., & Blahut, S. (2005). Evaluating the truth brand. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 181-192.
10. Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 11. Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 115-141. (Pubitemid 32536958)
12. Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 280-288.
13. Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 97-116). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Forehand, M. R., Deshpandé, R., & Reed, A. (2002). Identity salience and the influence of differential activation of the social self-schema on advertising response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1086-1099. (Pubitemid 44151667)
15. Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Lane, D. J. (2003). A social-reaction model of adolescent health risk. In J. J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 107-136). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
16. Goodall, C. E. (2009). Automated attitude activation: Studies on processing and effects of alcohol advertisements and public service announcements. Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of The Ohio State University, Columbus.
17. Harwood, J., & Roy, A. (2005). Social identity theory and mass communication research. In J. Harwood & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 189-211). New York: Peter Lang.
18. Hayes, A. F. (2007). INDIRECT version 3 [macro for SPSS]. Retrieved February 1, 2009 from http://www.comm.ohio-state.edu/ahayes
19. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
20. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1981)
21. Jarvis, B. G. (2006a). MediaLab (Version 2006.2.25) [Computer software]. New York: Empirisoft Corporation.
22. Jarvis, B. G. (2006b). DirectRT (Version 2006.2.25) [Computer software]. New York: Empirisoft Corporation.
23. Lang, A., Bolls, P., Potter, R. F., & Kawahara, K. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 451-475.
24. Lee, J., & Bell, J. (2003). Individual differences in attachment-autonomy configurations: Linkages with substance use and youth competencies. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 347-361. (Pubitemid 36722649)
25. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
26. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
27. O'Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251-274. (Pubitemid 37216541)
28. O'Shea, M., McGregor, I. S., & Mallet, P. E. (2006). Repeated cannabinoid exposure during perinatal, adolescent or early adult stages produces similar longlasting deficits in object recognition and reduced social interaction in rats. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 20, 611-621. (Pubitemid 44315859)
29. Paek, H. (2008). Mechanisms through which adolescents attend and respond to antismoking media campaigns. Journal of Communication, 58, 84-105.
30. Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Lorch, E., Hoyle, R., & Stephenson, M. (2001). Television campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: Tests of sensation seeking targeting. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 292-296. (Pubitemid 32113191)
31. Pope, H. G. Jr., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. (1996). The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 521-527. (Pubitemid 26061426)
32. Reed II, A. (2004). Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: Exploring identity salience effects on judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 286-295. (Pubitemid 39518974)
33. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. R. D. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 97-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Slater, M. D. (2006). Specification and misspecification of theoretical foundations and logic models for health communication campaigns. Health Communication, 20, 149-157. (Pubitemid 44594719)
35. Slater, M. D., Kelly, K. J., Edwards, R. W., Thurman, P. J., Plested, B. A., Keefe, T. J., et al. (2006). Combining in-school and community-based media efforts: Reducing marijuana and alcohol uptake among younger adolescents. Health Education Research, 21, 157-167. (Pubitemid 43244091)
36. Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642.
37. Stephenson, M. T., & Palmgreen, P. (2001). Sensation-seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti-marijuana PSAs. Communication Monographs, 68, 49-71.
38. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson.
39. Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime-to-behavior effects: The active-self Account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 234-261.
40. Zhao, X., Sayeed, S., Cappella, J., Hornik, R., Fishbein, M., & Ahern, R. (2006). Targeting norm-related beliefs about marijuana use in an adolescent population. Health Communication, 19, 187-196. (Pubitemid 43989058)