Target selection bias transfers across different response actions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1117-1130

  Moher, Jeff ^a   Song, Joo Hyun ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Memory; Priming of popout; Selection for action; Trial history; Visually guided reaching

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901618518     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035739     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 437-443. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
2. Band, G., & Van Boxtel, G. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101, 179-211. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00005-0
3. Barton, J. J. S., Greenzang, C., Hefter, R., Edelman, J., & Manoach, D. S. (2006). Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 76-87. doi:10.1007/ s00221-005-0091-1
4. Becker, S. I. (2008a). The mechanism of priming: Episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?. Acta Psychologica, 127, 324-339. doi:10.1016/j .actpsy.2007.07.005
5. Becker, S. I. (2008b). The stage of priming: Are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional?. Vision Research, 48, 664-684. doi:10.1016/j .visres.2007.10.025
6. Bichot, N., & Schall, J. (2002). Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: Feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(11), 4675-4685.
7. Brainard, D. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.
8. Bravo, M., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465-472. doi:10.3758/ BF03211642
9. Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional templates in visual working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9315-9322. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011
10. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
11. Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 1585-1599. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2054
12. Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2010). Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 269-298. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135409
13. Desmurget, M., Jordan, M., Prablanc, C., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(3), 1644-1650.
14. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32-39. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10 .1.32
15. Gallivan, J. P., McLean, D. A., Smith, F. W., & Culham, J. C. (2011). Decoding effector-dependent and effector-independent movement intentions from human parieto-frontal brain activity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 17149-17168. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1058-11.2011
16. Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263-276. doi:10.3758/BF03201138
17. Goolsby, B., & Suzuki, S. (2001). Understanding priming of colorsingleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and" retrieval". Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 929-944. doi:10.3758/BF03194513
18. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99. doi:10.1037/h0028689
19. Hillstrom, A. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817. doi:10.3758/BF03206924
20. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216. doi:10.1080/ 713756773
21. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500. doi:10.1016/j.tics .2004.08.007
22. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X01000103
23. Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 12-20. doi:10.3758/BF03195816
24. Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 425-441. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.425
25. Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1573-1577. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05 .019
26. Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1474-1486. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1474
27. Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention. Perception. & Psychophysics, 72, 5-18. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.5
28. Kristjánsson, A., Ingvarsdottir, A., & Teitsdottir, U. D. (2008). Object-and feature-based priming in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 378-384. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.378
29. Kristjánsson, Á, Saevarsson, S., & Driver, J. (2013). The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: From passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 514-521. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0375-6
30. Lamy, D. F., & Kristjánsson, A. (2013). Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review. Journal of Vision, 13, 14-19. doi:10.1167/13.3.14
31. Leonard, C., & Egeth, H. (2008). Attentional guidance in singleton search: An examination of top-down, bottom-up, and intertrial factors. Visual Cognition, 16, 1078-1091. doi:10.1080/13506280701580698
32. Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2011). Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1563-1579. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.564291
33. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672. doi:10.3758/BF03209251
34. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977-991. doi:10.3758/ BF03206826
35. McPeek, R., Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system. Vision Research, 39, 1555-1566. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00228-4
36. Miller, J., Riehle, A., & Requin, J. (1992). Effects of preliminary perceptual output on neuronal activity of the primary motor cortex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1121-1138. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1121
37. Moher, J., Lakshmanan, B. M., Egeth, H. E. & Ewen, J. (in press). Inhibition drives early feature-based attention. Psychological Science.
38. Moher, J., & Song, J. H. (2013). Context-dependent sequential effects of target selection for action. Journal of Vision, 13, 10-13. doi:10.1167/ 13.8.10
39. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
40. Rogers, R., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
41. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943-974. doi:10.1037/a0020541
42. Song, J.-H., & Mcpeek, R. M. (2009). Eye-hand coordination during target selection in a pop-out visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 2681-2692. doi:10.1152/jn.91352.2008
43. Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing. Journal of Vision, 6, 982-995. doi:10.1167/6.9.11
44. Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2007a). Fixation offset facilitates saccades and manual reaching for single but not multiple target displays. Experimental Brain Research, 177, 223-232. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0667-4
45. Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2007b). Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness. Journal of Vision, 7, 2. doi:10.1167/7.5.2
46. Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories. Vision Research, 48, 853-861. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.015
47. Song, J.-H., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 360-366. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009
48. Song, J.-H., Rafal, R. D., & Mcpeek, R. M. (2011). Deficits in reach target selection during inactivation of the midbrain superior colliculus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, e1433-e1440. doi:10.1073/pnas.1109656108
49. Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R. (2006). Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 207-211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00437.x
50. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393-10398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503903102
51. Strauss, S., & Heinke, D. (2012). A robotics-based approach to modeling of choice reaching experiments on visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 105.
52. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606. doi:10.3758/BF03211656
53. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
54. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 631-650. doi: 10.1080/14640749408401131
55. Welsh, T., & Elliott, D. (2005). The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goal-directed movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus. Acta Psychologica, 119, 123-142. doi:10.1016/j .actpsy.2005.01.001
56. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483-502. doi:10.1037/ 0096-1523.29.2.483
57. Yashar, A., Makovski, T., & Lamy, D. (2013). The role of motor response in implicit encoding: Evidence from intertrial priming in pop-out search. Vision Research, 13, 1-36.
58. Zehetleitner, M., Hegenloh, M., & Muller, H. J. (2011). Visually guided pointing movements are driven by the salience map. Journal of Vision, 11, 24. doi:10.1167/11.1.24