Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2007, Pages

  Song, Joo Hyun ^a,b   Nakayama, Ken ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITH KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Explicit knowledge; Homogenization; Implicit learning; Visually guided reaching; Visuomotor readiness

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ATTENTION; HUMANS; LEARNING; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33947355472     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.5.2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421- 452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610-615.
3. Atkeson, C. G., & Hollerbach, J. M. (1985). Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 2318-2330.
4. de Lussanet, M. H., Smeets, J. B., & Brenner, E. (2002). The relation between task history and movement strategy. Behavioural Brain Research, 129, 51-59.
5. Desmurget, M., Jordan, M., Prablanc, C., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 1644-1650.
6. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Kinoshita, S., & Mozer, M. C. (2006). How lexical decision is affected by recent experience: Symmetric versus asymmetric frequency-blocking effects. Memory & Cognition, 34, 726-742.
8. Kristjansson, A., Wang, D., & Nakayama, K. (2002). The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition, 85, 37-52.
9. Los, S. A. (1994). Procedural differences in processing intact and degraded stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 22, 145-156.
10. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 570-590.
12. Lupker, S. J., Kinoshita, S., Coltheart, M., & Taylor, T. (2003). Mixing costs and mixing benefits in naming words, pictures, and sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 556-575.
13. MaIjkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
14. Maloney, L. T., Dal Martello, M. F., Sahm, C., & Spillmann, L. (2005). Past trials influence perception of ambiguous motion quartets through pattern completion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 3164-3169.
15. Marr, D. (1980). Visual information processing: The structure and creation of visual representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 290, 199-218.
16. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327-342.
17. Mozer, M. C., Kinoshita, S., & Shettel, M. (2007). Sequential dependencies offer insight into cognitive control. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 180-193). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. Journal of Vision, 5(5):1, 376-404, http://joumalofvision.org/5/5/1/, doi:10.1167/ 5.5.1. [PubMed] [Article]
20. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482-503.
21. Rastle, K., Kinoshita, S., Lupker, S. J., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Cross-task strategic effects. Memory & Cognition, 31, 867-876. [PubMed]
22. Ratcliff, R., Cherian, A., & Segraves, M. (2003). A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of simple two-choice decisions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 1392-1407.
23. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
24. Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). North Holland: Amsterdam.
25. Smit, A. C., & Van Gisbergen, J. A. (1990). An analysis of curvature in fast and slow human saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 81, 335-345.
26. Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 161-168.
27. Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing. Journal of Vision, 6(9):Il, 982-995, http://joumalofvision.org/6/9/1 1/, doi: 10. 1167/ 6.9.11.
28. Sperling, G., & Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance: Volume 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 2-1-2-65). New York: Wiley.
29. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393-10398.
30. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
31. Stoffels, E. J. (1996). Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of response: An S-R compatibility study. Acta Psychologica, 94, 227-252.
32. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994a). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318-341.
33. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994b). Strategies and automaticity: H. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 342-365.
34. Stuphom, V., & Schall, I D. (2002). Neuronal control and monitoring of initiation of movements. Muscle & Nerve, 26, 326-339.
35. Taylor, T. E., & Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 117-138.
36. Treisman, M., & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. PsychologicalReview, 91, 68-111.
37. Van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83-94.