Context-dependent sequential effects of target selection for action

Journal of Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Moher, Jeff ^a   Song, Joo Hyun ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Partial errors; Priming of pop out; Selection for action; Trial history; Visually guided reaching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PARTIAL ERRORS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIMING OF POP-OUT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SELECTION FOR ACTION; TRIAL HISTORY; VISUALLY GUIDED REACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

PARTIAL ERRORS; PRIMING OF POP-OUT; SELECTION FOR ACTION; TRIAL HISTORY; VISUALLY GUIDED REACHING;

COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882797163     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/13.8.10     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Allain, S., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Vidal, F. (2009). Sequential adjustments before and after partial errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 356-362.
2. Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2010). Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing atwo-process model. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(2), 342-352.
3. Bichot, N. P., & Schall, J. D. (1999). Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 549-554.
4. Brainard, D. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.
5. Bravo, M., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual search tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(5), 465-472.
6. Burle, B., Allain, S., Vidal, F., & Hasbroucq, T. (2005). Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31(4), 831-837.
7. Chun, M., & Nakayama, K. (2000). On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 65-81.
8. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28-71.
9. Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585-1599.
10. Coles, M., Scheffers, M., & Fournier, L. (1995). Where did you go wrong? Errors, partial errors, and the nature of human information processing. Acta Psychologica, 90, 129-144.
11. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
12. Desmurget, M., Jordan, M., Prablanc, C., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(3), 1644-1650.
13. Diedrichsen, J., White, O., Newman, D., & Lally, N. (2010). Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(15), 5159-5166.
14. Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11(6), 467-473.
15. Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(2), 454-465.
16. Esterman, M., Noonan, S. K., Rosenberg, M., & DeGutis, J. (2012). In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. Cerebral Cortex, published online August 31, 2012, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs261.
17. Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4(6), 385-390.
18. Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002a). Oculomotor capture and inhibition of return: Evidence for an oculomotor suppression account of IOR. Psychological Research, 66(4), 234-246.
19. Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002b). Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 28(5), 1039-1054.
20. Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30(3), 538-554.
21. Hester, R., Foxe, J. J., Molholm, S., Shpaner, M., & Garavan, H. (2005). Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness. NeuroImage, 27(3), 602-608.
22. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494-500.
23. Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research, 71(1), 42-63.
24. Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33(2), 425-441.
25. Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia, 47(6), 1573-1577.
26. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, II, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023-1026.
27. Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5-18.
28. Kristjánsson, Á., & Driver, J. (2008). Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition,distractor repetition and role-reversal. Vision Research, 48(10), 1217-1232.
29. Lamy, D., Antebi, C., Aviani, N., & Carmel, T. (2008). Priming of pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Vision Research, 48(1), 30-41.
30. Leber, A. B. (2010). Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(34), 11458-11465.
31. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657-672.
32. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 977-991.
33. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7(5), 571-595.
34. McPeek, R., Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system. Vision Research, 39(8), 1555-1566.
35. Minken, A., Opstal, A. J., & Gisbergen, J. (1993). Three-dimensional analysis of strongly curved saccades elicited by double-step stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 93(3), 521-533.
36. Pashler, H., & Shiu, L. (1999). Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(3), 445-448.
37. Rabbitt, P. M. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 264-272.
38. Song, J., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories. Vision Research, 48(7), 853-861.
39. Song, J., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(8), 360-366.
40. Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing. Journal of Vision, 6(9):11, 982-995, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/9/11, doi:10.1167/6.9.11. [PubMed] [Article]
41. Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2007). Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness. Journal of Vision, 7(5):2, 1-9, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/5/2, doi:10.1167/7.5.2. [PubMed] [Article]
42. Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R. (2006). Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 207-211.
43. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102(29), 10393-10398.
44. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Houghton, G. (1999). Behavioral consequences of selection form neural population codes. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 223-245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Fleckenstein, R. M., Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33(5), 1117-1126.
46. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 27(3), 497-504.
47. Welsh, T., & Elliott, D. (2005). The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goaldirected movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus. Acta Psychologica, 119(2), 123-142.
48. Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2004). Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A(6), 1031-1057.
49. Wood, D. K., Gallivan, J. P., Chapman, C. S., Milne, J. L., Culham, J. C., & Goodale, M. A. (2011). Visual salience dominates early visuomotor competition in reaching behavior. Journal of Vision, 11(10):16, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/10/16, doi:10.1167/11.10.16. [PubMed] [Article]
50. Yantis, S., Meyer, D. E., & Smith, J. K. (1991). Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: New tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 350.