Crossover heterogeneity in the absence of hotspots in Caenorhabditis elegans

Genetics

Volumn 196, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 137-148

  Kaur, Taniya ^a   Rockman, Matthew V ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMOSOME 2; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CROSSING OVER; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HERMAPHRODITE; MALE; MICROBIAL GENOME; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT; SOMATIC CELL;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; HETEROGENEITY; HOTSPOTS; RECOMBINATION;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOMES; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HERMAPHRODITIC ORGANISMS; MALE; MEIOSIS;

EID: 84901337461     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.158857     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Adzhubei, I. A., S. Schmidt, L. Peshkin, V. E. Ramensky, A. Gerasimova et al., 2010 A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7: 248-249.
2. Agostinho, A., B. Meier, R. Sonneville, M. Jagut, A. Woglar et al., 2013 Combinatorial regulation of meiotic Holliday junction resolution in C. elegans by HIM-6 (BLM) helicase, SLX-4, and the SLX-1, MUS-81 and XPF-1 nucleases. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003591.
3. Albertson, D. G., and J. N. Thomson, 1982 The kinetochores of Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 86: 409-428.
4. Andersen, E. C., J. P. Gerke, J. A. Shapiro, J. R. Crissman, R. Ghosh et al., 2012 Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nat. Genet. 44: 285-290.
5. Axelsson, E., M. T. Webster, A. Ratnakumar, C. P. Ponting, and K. Lindblad-Toh, 2012 Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Res. 22: 51-63.
6. Barnes, T. M., Y. Kohara, A. Coulson, and S. Hekimi, 1995 Meiotic recombination, noncoding DNA and genomic organization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 141: 159-179.
7. Baudat, F., J. Buard, C. Grey, A. Fledel-Alon, C. Ober et al., 2010 PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836-840.
8. Birdsell, J. A., 2002 Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1181-1197.
9. Brenner, S., 1974 The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71-94.
10. Buard, J., P. Barthes, C. Grey, and B. de Massy, 2009 Distinct histone modifications define initiation and repair of meiotic recombination in the mouse. EMBO J. 28: 2616-2624.
11. C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, 1998 Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282: 2012-2018.
12. Capra, J. A., and K. S. Pollard, 2011 Substitution patterns are GCbiased in divergent sequences across the metazoans. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 516-527.
13. Chakravarti, A., 1991 A graphical representation of genetic and physical maps: the Marey map. Genomics 11: 219-222.
14. Charif, D., and J. R. Lobry, 2007 SeqinR 1.0-2: a contributed package to the R project for statistical computing devoted to biological sequences retrieval and analysis, pp. 207-232 in Structural Approaches to Sequence Evolution: Molecules, Networks, Populations, edited by H. E. Roman, U. Bastolla, M. Port, o and M. Vendruscolo. Springer-Verlag, New York.
15. Cirulli, E. T., R. M. Kliman, and M. A. Noor, 2007 Fine-scale crossover rate heterogeneity in Drosophila pseudoobscura. J. Mol. Evol. 64: 129-135.
16. Comeron, J. M., R. Ratnappan, and S. Bailin, 2012 The many landscapes of recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002905.
17. Couteau, F., and M. Zetka, 2011 DNA damage during meiosis induces chromatin remodeling and synaptonemal complex disassembly. Dev. Cell 20: 353-363.
18. Cutter, A. D., and B. A. Payseur, 2003 Selection at linked sites in the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 665-673.
19. Cutter, A. D., and B. A. Payseur, 2013 Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14: 262-274.
20. Cutter, A. D., J. D. Wasmuth and N. L. Washington, 2008 Patterns of molecular evolution in Caenorhabditis preclude ancient origins of selfing. Genetics 178: 2093-2104.
21. de Castro, E., I. Soriano, L. Marin, R. Serrano, L. Quintales et al., 2012 Nucleosomal organization of replication origins and meiotic recombination hotspots in fission yeast. EMBO J. 31: 124-137.
22. Eyre-Walker, A., 1993 Recombination and mammalian genome evolution. Proc. Biol. Sci. 252: 237-243.
23. Galtier, N., G. Piganeau, D. Mouchiroud and L. Duret, 2001 GCcontent evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics 159: 907-911.
24. Gastwirth, J. L., 1972 The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gini index. Rev. Econ. Stat. 54: 306-316.
25. Gerstein, M. B., Z. J. Lu, E. L. Van Nostrand, C. Cheng, B. I. Arshinoff et al., 2010 Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science 330: 1775-1787.
26. Hammarlund, M., M. W. Davis, H. Nguyen, D. Dayton, and E. M. Jorgensen, 2005 Heterozygous insertions alter crossover distribution but allow crossover interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 171: 1047-1056.
27. Henderson, I. R., 2012 Control of meiotic recombination frequency in plant genomes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15: 556-561.
28. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson, 1966 The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8: 269-294.
29. Hillers, K. J., and A. M. Villeneuve, 2003 Chromosome-wide control of meiotic crossing over in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 13: 1641-1647.
30. Hyppa, R. W., and G. R. Smith, 2010 Crossover invariance determined by partner choice for meiotic DNA break repair. Cell 142: 243-255.
31. Ikegami, K., T. A. Egelhofer, S. Strome, and J. D. Lieb, 2010 Caenorhabditis elegans chromosome arms are anchored to the nuclear membrane via discontinuous association with LEM-2. Genome Biol. 11: R120.
32. Kong, A., G. Thorleifsson, D. F. Gudbjartsson, G. Masson, A. Sigurdsson et al., 2010 Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals. Nature 467: 1099-1103.
33. Kumar, P., S. Henikoff, and P. C. Ng, 2009 Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 4: 1073-1081.
34. Lesecque, Y., D. Mouchiroud and L. Duret, 2013 GC-biased gene conversion in yeast is specifically associated with crossovers: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary significance. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 1409-1419.
35. Li, H., B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker, T. Fennell, J. Ruan et al., 2009 The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
36. Lichten, M., and B. de Massy, 2011 The impressionistic landscape of meiotic recombination. Cell 147: 267-270.
37. Liu, T., A. Rechtsteiner, T. A. Egelhofer, A. Vielle, I. Latorre et al., 2011 Broad chromosomal domains of histone modification patterns in C. elegans. Genome Res. 21: 227-236.
38. Lui, D. Y., and M. P. Colaiacovo, 2013 Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 757: 133-170.
39. Lunter, G., and M. Goodson, 2011 Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 21: 936-939.
40. Mancera, E., R. Bourgon, A. Brozzi, W. Huber, and L. M. Steinmetz, 2008 High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and noncrossovers in yeast. Nature 454: 479-485.
41. Marais, G., B. Charlesworth and S. I. Wright, 2004 Recombination and base composition: the case of the highly self-fertilizing plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol. 5: R45.
42. McGaugh, S. E., C. S. Heil, B. Manzano-Winkler, L. Loewe, S. Goldstein et al., 2012 Recombination modulates how selection affects linked sites in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 10: e1001422.
43. McKim, K. S., A. M. Howell, and A. M. Rose, 1988 The effects of translocations on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 120: 987-1001.
44. McVean, G. A., S. R. Myers, S. Hunt, P. Deloukas, D. R. Bentley et al., 2004 The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome. Science 304: 581-584.
45. Meneely, P. M., O. L. McGovern, F. I. Heinis, and J. L. Yanowitz, 2012 Crossover distribution and frequency are regulated by him-5 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 190: 1251-1266.
46. Mets, D. G., and B. J. Meyer, 2009 Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell 139: 73-86.
47. Myers, S., R. Bowden, A. Tumian, R. E. Bontrop, C. Freeman et al., 2010 Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327: 876-879.
48. Ng, P., and M. Maechler, 2007 A fast and efficient implementation of qualitatively constrained quantile smoothing splines. Stat. Model. 7: 315-328.
49. Oliver, P. L., L. Goodstadt, J. J. Bayes, Z. Birtle, K. C. Roach et al., 2009 Accelerated evolution of the Prdm9 speciation gene across diverse metazoan taxa. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000753.
50. O'Neil, N. J., J. S. Martin, J. L. Youds, J. D. Ward, M. I. Petalcorin et al., 2013 Joint molecule resolution requires the redundant activities of MUS-81 and XPF-1 during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003582.
51. Paigen, K., and P. Petkov, 2010 Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 221-233.
52. Paigen, K., J. P. Szatkiewicz, K. Sawyer, N. Leahy, E. D. Parvanov et al., 2008 The recombinational anatomy of a mouse chromosome. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000119.
53. Pan, J., M. Sasaki, R. Kniewel, H. Murakami, H. G. Blitzblau et al., 2011 A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144: 719-731.
54. Parvanov, E. D., P. M. Petkov, and K. Paigen, 2010 Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327: 835.
55. Poh, Y. P., C. T. Ting, H. W. Fu, C. H. Langley and D. J. Begun, 2012 Population genomic analysis of base composition evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol. Evol. 4: 1245-1255.
56. R Core Team, 2013 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
57. Reddy, K. C., and A. M. Villeneuve, 2004 C. elegans HIM-17 links chromatin modification and competence for initiation of meiotic recombination. Cell 118: 439-452.
58. Rockman, M. V., and L. Kruglyak, 2009 Recombinational landscape and population genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000419.
59. Rockman, M. V., S. S. Skrovanek, and L. Kruglyak, 2010 Selection at linked sites shapes heritable phenotypic variation in C. elegans. Science 330: 372-376.
60. Rosu, S., D. E. Libuda, and A. M. Villeneuve, 2011 Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number Science 334: 1286-1289.
61. Saito, T. T., D. Y. Lui, H.-M. Kim, K. Meyer and M. P. Colaiacovo, 2013 Interplay between structure-specific endonucleases for crossover control during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003586.
62. Schvarzstein, M., S. M. Wignall, and A. M. Villeneuve, 2010 Coordinating cohesion, co-orientation, and congression during meiosis: lessons from holocentric chromosomes. Genes Dev. 24: 219-228.
63. Singh, N. D., E. A. Stone, C. F. Aquadro, and A. G. Clark, 2013 Finescale heterogeneity in crossover rate in the garnet-scalloped region of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Genetics 194: 375-387.
64. Smagulova, F., I. V. Gregoretti, K. Brick, P. Khil, R. D. Camerini-Otero et al., 2011 Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472: 375-378.
65. Stiernagle, T., 2006 Maintenance of C. elegans (February 11, 2006). WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1, http://www. wormbook.org.
66. Stumpf, M. P., and G. A. McVean, 2003 Estimating recombination rates from population-genetic data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 959-968.
67. Tsai, C. J., D. G. Mets, M. R. Albrecht, P. Nix, A. Chan et al., 2008 Meiotic crossover number and distribution are regulated by a dosage compensation protein that resembles a condensin subunit. Genes Dev. 22: 194-211.
68. Wagner, C. R., L. Kuervers, D. L. Baillie, and J. L. Yanowitz, 2010 xnd-1 regulates the global recombination landscape in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 467: 839-843.
69. Winnier, A. R., J. Y. Meir, J. M. Ross, N. Tavernarakis, M. Driscoll et al., 1999 UNC-4/UNC-37-dependent repression of motor neuron-specific genes controls synaptic choice in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 13: 2774-2786.
70. Wu, T. C., and M. Lichten, 1994 Meiosis-induced double-strand break sites determined by yeast chromatin structure. Science 263: 515-518.
71. Yelina, N. E., K. Choi, L. Chelysheva, M. Macaulay, B. de Snoo et al., 2012 Epigenetic remodeling of meiotic crossover frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methyltransferase mutants. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002844.
72. Yook, K., T. W. Harris, T. Bieri, A. Cabunoc, J. Chan et al., 2012 WormBase 2012: more genomes, more data, new website. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: D735-D741.
73. Young, J. A., R. W. Schreckhise, W. W. Steiner, and G. R. Smith, 2002 Meiotic recombination remote from prominent DNA break sites in S. pombe. Mol. Cell 9: 253-263.
74. Zeileis, A., F. Leisch, K. Hornik, and C. Kleiber, 2002 strucchange: an R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models. J. Stat. Softw. 7: 1-38.
75. Zetka, M. C., and A. M. Rose, 1995 Mutant rec-1 eliminates the meiotic pattern of crossing over in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 141: 1339-1349.