Relationship between ethanol preference and sensation/novelty seeking

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 133, Issue , 2014, Pages 53-60

  Manzo, Lidia ^a   Gómez, Maa José ^a   Callejas Aguilera, José E ^a   Donaire, Rocío ^a   Sabariego, Marta ^a   Fernández Teruel, Alberto ^b   Cañete, Antoni ^b   Blázquez, Gloria ^b   Papini, Mauricio R ^c   Torres, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethanol preference; Novelty seeking; Roman high and low avoidance strains; Sensation seeking

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; WATER; CENTRAL DEPRESSANT AGENT;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHARACTER; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; GROOMING; HOLE BOARD TEST; MALE; MAZE TEST; NONHUMAN; NOVELTY SEEKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REARING; SENSATION SEEKING; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; ANIMAL; DECISION MAKING; DOSE RESPONSE; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; DRUG EFFECTS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; INBRED RAT STRAIN; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ETHANOL; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; GROOMING; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; SENSATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84901291275     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
2. Dawe S., Loxton N.J. The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004, 28:343-351.
3. Flagel S.B., Waselus M., Clinton S.M., Watson S.J. Antecedents and consequences of drug abuse in rats selectively bred for high and low response to novelty. Neuropharmacology 2014, 76:425-436.
4. Jupp B., Dalley J.W. Behavioral endophenotypes of drug addiction: etiological insights from neuroimaging studies. Neuropharmacology 2014, 76:487-497.
5. Kreek M.J., Nielsen D.A., Butelman E.R., LaForge K.S. Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8:1450-1457.
6. Ballaz S.J. Differential novelty detection in rats selectively bred for novelty seeking behavior. Neurosci Lett 2009, 461:45-48.
7. Bardo M.T., Donohew R.L., Harrington N.G. Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav Brain Res 1996, 77:23-43.
8. Belin D., Deroche-Gamonet V. Responses to novelty and vulnerability to cocaine administration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2012, 2:a011940.
9. Conway K.P., Kane R.J., Ball S.A., Poling J.C., Rounsaville B.J. Personality, substance of choice, and polysubstance involvement among substance dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003, 71:65-75.
10. Meyer A.C., Rahman S., Charnigo R.J., Dwoskin L.P., Crabbe J.C., Bardo M.T. Genetics of novelty seeking, amphetamine self-administration and reinstatement using inbred rats. Genes Brain Behav 2010, 9:790-798.
11. Nadal R., Armario A., Janak P.H. Positive relationship between activity in a novel environment and operant ethanol self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 2002, 3:333-338.
12. Pelloux Y., Costentin J., Duterte-Boucher D. Novelty preference predicts place preference conditioning to morphine and its oral consumption in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2006, 84:43-50.
13. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 1989, 245:1511-1513.
14. Piazza P.V., Deroche-Gamonet V. A multistep general theory of transition to addiction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013, 229:387-413.
15. Redolat R., Pérez-Martínez A., Carrasco M.C., Mesa P. Individual differences in novelty-seeking and behavioral responses to nicotine: a review of animal studies. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2009, 2:230-242.
16. Vidal-Infer A., Arenas M.C., Daza-Losada M., Aguilar M.A., Miñarro J., Rodríguez-Arias M. High novelty seeking predicts greater sensitivity to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2012, 102:124-132.
17. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Smith A.D., Neill D.B., Justice J.B. Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse 1991, 9:121-128.
18. Hooks M.S., Colvin A.C., Juncos J.L., Justice J.B. Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis. Brain Res 1992, 587:306-312.
19. Rouge-Pont F., Piazza P.V., Kharouby M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Higher and longer stress-induced increase in dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens of animals predisposed to amphetamine self-administration. A microdialysis study. Brain Res 1993, 602:169-174.
20. Dellu F., Piazza P.V., Mayo W., Le Moal M., Simon H. Novelty-seeking in rats: biobehavioral characteristics and possible relationship with the sensation-seeking train in man. Neuropsychobiology 1996, 34:136-145.
21. Belin D., Mar A., Dalley J., Robbins T., Everitt B. High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking. Science 2008, 320:1352-1355.
22. Belin D., Berson N., Balado E., Piazza P.V., Deroche-Gamonet V. High-novelty-preference rats are predisposed to compulsive cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011, 36:569-579.
23. Flagel S.B., Robinson T.E., Clark J.J., Clinton S.M., Watson S.J., Seeman P., et al. An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35:388-400.
24. Estanislau C., Díaz-Morán S., Cañete T., Blázquez G., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A. Context-dependent differences in grooming behavior among the NIH heterogeneous stock and the Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Neurosci Res 2013, 77:187-201.
25. Giménez-Llort L., Cañete T., Guitart-Masip M., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A. Two distinctive apomorphine-induced phenotypes in the Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Physiol Behav 2005, 86:458-466.
26. Dellu F., Mayo W., Cherkaoui J., Le Moal M., Simon H. A two-trial memory task with automated recording: study in young and aged rats. Brain Res 1992, 588:132-139.
27. Bardo M.T., Neisewander J.L., Kelly T.H. Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology and abused drugs. Pharmacol Rev 2013, 65:255-290.
28. Molander A., Mar A., Norbury A., Steventon S., Moreno M., Caprioli D., et al. High impulsivity predicting vulnerability to cocaine addiction in rats: some relationship with novelty preference but not novelty reactivity, anxiety or stress. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011, 215:721-731.
29. Clinton S.M., Bedrosian T.A., Abraham A.D., Watson S.J., Akil H. Neural and environmental factors impacting maternal behavior differences in high- versus low-novelty-seeking rats. Horm Behav 2010, 57:463-473.
30. Ellenbroek B.A., van der Kam E.L., van der Elst M.C.J., Cools A.R. Individual differences in drug dependence in rats: the role of genetic factors and life events. Eur J Pharmacol 2005, 526:251-258.
31. Kabbaj M. Individual differences in vulnerability to drug abuse: the High Responders/Low Responders model. CNS Neurol Disord 2006, 5:513-520.
32. Driscoll P., Fernandez-Teruel A., Corda M., Giorgi O., Steimer T. Some guidelines for defining personality differences in rats. Handbook of behavior genetics 2009, Springer, New York. K. Yong-Kyu (Ed.).
33. Giorgi O., Piras G., Corda M.G. The psychogenetically selected Roman high- and low-avoidance rat lines: a model to study the individual vulnerability to drug addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007, 31:148-163.
34. Coppens C.M., de Boer S.F., Steimer T., Koolhaas J.M. Correlated behavioral traits in rats of the roman selection lines. Behav Genet 2013, 43:220-226.
35. Klein A., Ultved L., Adamsen D., Santini, Tobeña A, Fernández-Teruel A, Flores P, Moreno M, Cardona D, Knudsen M, Aznar S, Mikkelsen JD 5-HT2A and mGlu2 receptor binding levels are related to differences in impulsive behaviour in the Roman low- (RLA) and high (RHA) avoidance rat strains. Neuroscience 2014, 263:36-45.
36. Moreno M., Cardona D., Gomez M.J., Sanchez-Santed F., Tobeña A., Fernandez-Teruel A., et al. Impulsivity characterization in the roman high- and low-avoidance rat strains: behavioral and neurochemical differences. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35:1198-1208.
37. Siegel J., Sisson D.F., Driscoll P. Augmenting and reducing of visual evoked potentials in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Physiol Behav 1993, 54:707-711.
38. Zeier H., Baettig K., Driscoll P. Acquisition of DRL-20 behavior in male and female, Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Physiol Behav 1978, 20:791-793.
39. Escorihuela R.M., Fernandez-Teruel A., Gil L., Aguilar R., Tobena A., Driscoll P. Inbred Roman high- and low-avoidance rats: differences in anxiety, novelty-seeking, and shuttlebox behaviors. Physiol Behav 1999, 67:19-26.
40. Fernández-Teruel A., Escorihuela R.M., Núñez J.F., Gomà M., Driscoll P., Tobeña A. Early stimulation effects on novelty-induced behavior in two psychogenetically-selected rat lines with divergent emotionality profiles. Neurosci Let 1992, 137:185-188.
41. Fernández-Teruel A., Driscoll P., Gil L., Aguilar R., Tobeña A., Escorihuela R.M. Enduring effects of environmental enrichment on novelty seeking, saccharin and ethanol intake in two rat lines (RHA/Verh and RLA/Verh) differing in incentive-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002, 73:225-231.
42. Guitart-Masip M., Giménez-Llort L., Fernández-Teruel A., Canete T., Tobena A., Ögren S.O., et al. Reduced ethanol response in the alcohol-preferring RHA rats and neuropeptide mRNAs in relevant structures. Eur J Neurosci 2006, 23:531-540.
43. Piras G., Giorgi O., Corda M.G. Effects of antidepressants on the performance in the forced swim test of two psychogenetically selected lines of rats that differ in coping strategies to aversive conditions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2010, 211:403-414.
44. Piras G., Piludu M.A., Giorgi O., Corda M.G. Effects of chronic antidepressant treatments in a putative genetic model of vulnerability (Roman low-avoidance rats) and resistance (Roman high-avoidance rats) to stress-induced depression. Psychopharm 2014, 231:43-53.
45. Pisula W. The Roman high- and low-avoidance rats respond differently to novelty in a familiarized environment. Behav Processes 2003, 63:63-72.
46. Steimer T., Driscoll P. Divergent stress responses and coping styles in psychogenetically selected Roman high- (RHA) and low- (RLA) avoidance rats: behavioural, neuroendocrine and developmental aspects. Stress 2003, 6:87-100.
47. Razafimanalina R., Mormède P., Velley L. Gustatory preference-aversion profiles for saccharin, quinine and alcohol in Roman high- and low-avoidance lines. Behav Pharmacol 1996, 7:78-84.
48. Fattore L., Piras G., Corda M.G., Giorgi O. The Roman high- and low avoidance rat lines differ in the acquisition, maintenance, extinction, and reinstatement of intravenous cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 34:1091-1101.
49. Manzo L., Gómez M.J., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Fernández-Teruel A., Papini M.R., Torres C. Oral ethanol self-administration in inbred Roman high- and low-avoidance rats: gradual versus abrupt ethanol presentation. Physiol Behav 2012, 108:1-5.
50. 2 intercross of Roman rat strains. Brain Res Bull 2002, 57:17-26.
51. López-Aumatell R., Guitart-Masip M., Vicens-Costa E., Gimenez-Llort L., Valdar W., Johannesson M., et al. Fearfulness in a large N/Nih genetically heterogeneous rat stock: differential profiles of timidity and defensive flight in males and females. Behav Brain Res 2008, 188:41-55.
52. Zuckerman M., Kuhlman D.M., Joireman J., Teta P., Kraft M. A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three, the big five, and the alternative five. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993, 65:757-768.
53. Manzo L., Gómez M.J., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Fernández-Teruel A., Papini M., Torres C. Antianxiety self-medication induced by incentive loss in rats. Physiol Behav 2014, 123:86-92.
54. File S.E., Wardill A.G. Validity of head-dipping as a measure of exploration in a modified hole-board. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1975, 44:53-59.
55. Tverdic A., Kocevski D. Does behavioral response to novelty influence paw withdrawal latencies in repeated Hargreaves test?. Period Biol 2008, 110:95-100.
56. Bardo M.T., Bowling S.L., Robinet P.M., Rowlet J.K., Lacy M., Mattingly B.A. Role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in novelty-maintained place preference. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1993, 1:101-109.
57. Guitart-Masip M., Johansson B., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A., Gimenez-Llort L. Divergent effect of the selective D3 receptor agonist pd-128,907 on locomotor activity in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats: relationship to NGFI-A gene expression in the Calleja islands. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008, 196:39-49.
58. Hooks M.S., Juncos J.L., Justice J.B., Meiergerd S.M., Povlock S.L., Schenk J.O., et al. Individual locomotor response to novelty predicts selective alterations in D1 and D2 receptors and mRNAs. J Neurosci 1994, 14:6144-6152.
59. Kabbaj M., Evans S., Watson S.J., Akil H. The search for the neurobiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: using microarrays to investigate the role of stress and individual differences. Neuropharmacology 2004, 47:111-122.
60. Driscoll P., Dedek J., Fuchs A., Gentsch C. Stereotypic, hypothermic, and central dopaminergic effects of apomorphine in Roman high-avoidance (RHA/Verh) and Roman low-avoidance (RLA/Verh) rats. Behav Genet 1985, 15:591-592.
61. Driscoll P., Dedek J., D'Angio M., Claustre Y., Scatton B. A genetically-based model for divergent stress responses: behavioral, neurochemical and hormonal aspects. Fortschritte Der Tierzuechtung Und Zuechtungsbiologie. Adv Anim Breed Gen 1990, 5:97-107.
62. Giorgi O., Orlandi M., Escorihuela R.M., Driscoll P., Lecca D., Corda M.G. GABAergic and dopaminergic transmission in the brain of Roman high-avoidance and Roman low-avoidance rats. Brain Res 1994, 638:133-138.
63. D'Angio M., Serrano A., Driscoll P., Scatton B. Stressful environmental stimuli increase extracellular DOPAC levels in the prefrontal cortex of hypoemotional (Roman high-avoidance) but not hyperemotional (Roman low-avoidance) rats: an in vivo voltametric study. Brain Res 1988, 45:237-247.
64. Giorgi O., Corda M.G., Driscoll P., Orlandi M., Valentini V., Carboni G., et al. Ethanol (ET) intake and preference in Roman high-avoidance (RHA-/Verh) and Roman low-avoidance (RLA/Verh) rats: behavioral and brain microdialysis studies. Behav Gen 1997, 27:590-591.
65. Giorgi O., Lecca D., Piras G., Driscoll P., Corda M. Dissociation between mesocortical dopamine release and fear-related behaviours in two psychogenetically selected lines of rats that differ in coping strategies to aversive conditions. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 17:2716-2726.
66. Giorgi O., Piras G., Lecca D., Corda M.G. Differential activation of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core and shell after acute or repeated amphetamine injections: a comparative study in the Roman high- and low-avoidance rat lines. Neuroscience 2005, 135:987-998.
67. Lecca D., Piras G., Driscoll P., Giorgi O., Corda M.G. A differential activation of dopamine output in the shell and core of the nucleus accumbens is associated with the motor responses to addictive drugs: a brain dialysis study in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Neuropharmacology 2004, 46:688-699.
68. Corda M.G., Piras G., Lecca D., Fernández-Teruel A., Driscoll P., Giorgi O. The psychogenetically selected roman rat lines differ in the susceptibility to develop amphetamine sensitization. Behav Brain Res 2005, 157:147-156.
69. Piras G., Lecca D., Corda M.G., Giorgi O. Repeated morphine injections induce behavioural sensitization in Roman high- but not in Roman low-avoidance rats. Neuroreport 2003, 14:2433-2438.
70. Everitt B.J., Wolf M.E. Psychomotor stimulant addiction: a neural systems perspective. J Neurosci 2002, 22:3312-3320.
71. Sanna F., Corda M.G., Melis M.R., Piludu M.A., Löber S., Hübner H., et al. Dopamine agonist-induced penile erection and yawning: a comparative study in outbred Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2013, 109:59-66.
72. Sanna F., Corda M.G., Melis M.R., Piludu M.A., Giorgi O., Argiolas A. Male Roman high and low avoidance rats show different patterns of copulatory behavior: comparison with Sprague Dawley rats. Physiol Behav 2014, 127:27-36.
73. García-Falgueras A., Castillo-Ruiz M.M., Put T., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A. Differential hippocampal neuron density between inbred Roman high- (low anxious) and low-avoidance (high anxious) rats. Neurosci Let 2012, 522:41-46.
74. Gómez M.J., Morón I., Torres C., Esteban FJ, de la Torre L, Cándido A, Maldonado A, Fernández-Teruel A, Tobeña A, Escarabajal MD One-way avoidance acquisition and cellular density in the basolateral amygdala: strain differences in Roman high-and low-avoidance rats. Neurosci Let 2009, 450:317-320.
75. Lipp H.P., Schwegler H., Crusio W.E., Wolfer D.P., Leisinger-Trigona M.C., Heimrich B., et al. Using genetically-defined rodent strains for the identification of hippocampal traits relevant for two-way avoidance behavior: a non-invasive approach. Experientia 1989, 45:845-859.
76. Meyza K.Z., Boguszewski P.M., Nikolaev E., Zagrodzka J. Diverse sensitivity of RHA/Verh and RLA/Verh rats to emotional and spatial aspects of a novel environment as a result of a distinct pattern of neuronal activation in the fear/anxiety circuit. Behav Gen 2009, 39:48-61.
77. Fernández-Teruel A., Escorihuela R.M., Gray J.A., Aguilar R., Gil L., Giménez-Llort L., et al. A quantitative trait locus influencing anxiety in the laboratory rat. Genome Res 2002, 12:618-626.
78. Sabariego M., Gómez M.J., Morón I., Torres C., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobena A., et al. Differential gene expression between inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Neurosci Let 2011, 504:265-270.
79. Sabariego M., Morón I., Gómez M.J., Donaire R., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A., et al. Incentive loss and hippocampal gene expression in inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and Roman low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Behav Brain Res 2013, 257:62-70.