Genetics of novelty seeking, amphetamine self-administration and reinstatement using inbred rats

Genes, Brain and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 790-798

  Meyer, A C ^a,b   Rahman, S ^a,c   Charnigo, R J ^a,b   Dwoskin, L P ^a,d   Crabbe, J C ^e   Bardo, M T ^a,b  

^a Center for Drug Abuse Research Translation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Kentucky   (United States)

^e PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Addiction; Amphetamine; Genetics; Novelty seeking; Rat; Self administration

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETICS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; NOVELTY SEEKING BEHAVIOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; RAT; RAT STRAIN; REWARD; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

AMPHETAMINE-RELATED DISORDERS; ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; RATS; RATS, INBRED BN; RATS, INBRED BUF; RATS, INBRED DAHL; RATS, INBRED LEW; RATS, INBRED SHR; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; RATS, INBRED WKY; RECURRENCE; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SELF ADMINISTRATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

RATTUS;

EID: 78649610080     PISSN: 16011848     EISSN: 1601183X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00616.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bardo, M.T., Donohew, R.L., & Harrington, N.G. (1996) Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav Brain Res 77, 23-43.
2. Belknap, J.K., Mitchell, S.R., O'Toole, L.A., Helms, M.L., & Crabbe, J.C. (1996) Type I and type II error rates for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies using recombinant inbred mouse strains. Behav Gen 26, 149-160.
3. Cain, M.E., Smith, C.M., & Bardo, M.T. (2004) The effect of novelty on amphetamine self-administration in rats classified as high and low responders. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 176, 129-138.
4. Cain, M.E., Saucier, D.A., & Bardo, M.T. (2005) Novelty seeking and drug use: contribution of an animal model. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 13, 367-375.
5. Cain, M.E., Denehy, E.R., & Bardo, M.T. (2008) Individual differences in amphetamine self-administration: role of the central nucleus of the amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 1149-1161.
6. Carroll, M.E., & Lac, S.T. (1993) Autoshaping i.v. cocaine self-administration in rats: effects of nondrug alternative reinforcers on acquisition. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 110, 5-12.
7. Crabbe, J.C., Gallaher, E.S., Phillips, T.J., & Belknap, J.K. (1994) Genetic determinants of sensitivity to ethanol in inbred mice. Behav Neurosci 108, 186-195.
8. Crabbe, J.C., Metten, P., Cameron, A.J., & Wahlsten, D. (2005) An analysis of the genetics of alcohol intoxication in inbred mice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28, 785-802.
9. Cloninger, C.R. (1987) Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science 236, 410-416.
10. Davis, B.A., Clinton, S.M., Akil, H., & Becker, J.B. (2008) The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred high-responder and low-responder rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 90, 331-338.
11. Dworkin, S.I., & Stairs, D.J. (2003) Self-administration of drugs of abuse. In Waterhouse B.D. (ed), Methods in Drug Abuse Research: Cellular and Circuit Level Analyses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 17-49.
12. Epstein, D.H., Preston, K.L., Stewart, J., & Shaham, Y. (2006) Toward a model of drug relapse: an assessment of the validity of the reinstatement procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 189, 1-16.
13. Exner, M., & Clark, D. (1993) Behavior in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multivariate approach. Behav Pharmacol 4, 47-56.
14. Falconer, D.S., & Mackay, T.F.C. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Harlow.
15. Fattore, L., Piras, G., Corda, M.G., & Giorgi, O. (2009) The Roman high- and low-avoidance rat lines differ in the acquisition, maintenance, extinction, and reinstatement of intravenous cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 1091-1101.
16. Goodwin, J.S., Larson, G.A., Swant, J., Sen, N., Javitch, J.A., Zahniser, N.R., De Felice, L.J., & Khoshbouei, H. (2009) Amphetamine and methamphetamine differentially affect dopamine transporters in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 284, 2978-2989.
17. Gulley, J.M., Everett, C.V., & Zahniser, N.R. (2007) Inbred Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains differ not only in novelty- and amphetamine-induced behaviors, but also in dopamine transporter activity in vivo. Brain Res 1151, 32-45.
18. Hegmann, J.P., & Possidente, B. (1981) Estimating genetic correlations from inbred strains. Behav Genet 11, 103-114.
19. Katz, J.L., & Higgins, S.T. (2003) The validity of the reinstatement model of craving and relapse to drug use. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168, 3-20.
20. Kliethermes, C.L., & Crabbe, J.C. (2006) Genetic independence of mouse measures of some aspects of novelty seeking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 5018-5023.
21. Kliethermes, C.L., Kamens, H.M., & Crabbe, J.C. (2007) Drug reward and intake in lines of mice selectively bred for divergent exploration of a hole board apparatus. Genes Brain Behav 6, 608-618.
22. Kosten, T.A. & Ambrosio, E. (2002) HPA axis function and drug addictive behaviors: insights from studies with Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 27, 35-69.
23. Kosten, T.A., Zhang, X.Y., & Haile, C.N. (2007) Strain differences in maintenance of cocaine self-administration and their relationship to novelty activity responses. Behav Neurosci 121, 380-388.
24. Lynch, W.J., & Carroll, M.E. (2001) Regulation of drug intake. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9, 131-43.
25. Mantsch, J.R., Ho, A., Schlussman, S.D., & Kreek, M.J. (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended-access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 157, 31-39.
26. McClearn, G.E., & Kakihana, R. (1981) Selective breeding for ethanol sensitivity: Short-Sleep and Long-Sleep mice. In McClearn G.E., Deitrich, R.A. & Erwin V.G. (eds). Development of Animal Models as Pharmacogenetic Tools. USDHHS:NIAAA: Rockville, MD, pp. 147-159.
27. Marinelli, M. (2005) The many facets of locomotor response to a novel environment test: theoretical comment on Mitchell, Cunningham, and Mark. Behav Neurosci 119, 1144-1151.
28. Mitchell, J.M., Cunningham, C.L., & Mark, G.P. (2005) Locomotor activity predicts acquisition of self-administration behavior but not cocaine intake. Behav Neurosci 119, 464-472.
29. Piazza, P.V., Deminiere, J.M., Le Moal, M., & Simon, H. (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245, 1511-1513.
30. Ramos, A., Berton, O., Mormede, P., & Chaouloff, F. (1997) A multiple-test study of anxiety-related behaviours in six inbred rat strains. Behav Brain Res 85, 57-69.
31. Robinet, P.M., Rowlett, J.K., & Bardo, M.T. (1998) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetamine in rats. Behav Processes 44, 1-9.
32. Sparber, S.B., Bollweg, G.L., & Messing, R.B. (1991) Food deprivation enhances both autoshaping and autoshaping impairment by a latent inhibition procedure. Behav Processes 23, 59-74.
33. Suto, N., Austin, J.D., & Vezina, P. (2001) Locomotor response to novelty predicts a rat's propensity to self-administer nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158, 175-180.
34. Tsibulsky, V.L., & Norman, A.B. (1999) Satiety threshold: a quantitative model of maintained cocaine self-administration. Brain Res 839, 85-93.
35. Ward, A.S., Li, D.H., Luedtk, R.R., & Emmett-Oglesby, M.W. (1996) Variations in cocaine self-administration by inbred rat strains under a progressive-ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 127, 204-212.
36. Zuckerman, M. (1994) Behavioral expression and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press: New York.