How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 267-281

  Lee, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45749128738     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070802049202     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Åkerlind, G. 2004. A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education 9: 363-76.
2. _. 2007. Constraints on academics' potential for developing as a teacher. Studies in Higher Education 32, no. 1: 21-37.
3. Argyris, C., and D. Schon. 1974. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Barnett, R. 1997. Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5. Becher, T., and P.R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.
6. Becker, H. 1998. Tricks of the trade. How to think about your research while you're doing it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7. Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Birch, M., and T. Miller. 2000. Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3, no. 3: 189-202.
9. Blumer. H. 1969. Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Brew, A. 2001. Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education 26: 271-85.
11. Brown, M., and K. Freeman. 2000. Distinguishing features of critical thinking classrooms. Teaching in Higher Education 5, no. 3: 301-9.
12. Code of Practice for Research Degrees. 2000. (Revised 2005). University of Surrey. http:// portal.surrey.ac.uk/portal/page?_pageid=719,333084&_dod= portal&_schema=PORTAL (accessed 30 October 2007).
13. Coffey, A., and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making senses of qualitative data: Contemporary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Cousin, G., and F. Deepwell. 2005. Designs for network learning: A communities of practice perspective. Studies in Higher Education 30, no. 1: 57-66.
15. Cryer, P. 1997. Handling common dilemmas in supervision. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
16. Darling, L.A. 1985. What do nurses want in a mentor? Journal of Nursing Administration 14, no. 10: 42-4.
17. Delamont. S., P. Atkinson, and O. Parry. 2000. The doctoral experience. Success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer Press.
18. Eley, A., and R. Jennings. 2005. Effective postgraduate supervision. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
19. Entwistle, N. 1997. Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Research and Development in Higher Education 16: 127-34.
20. _. 2007. Research into student learning and university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II 4: 1-18.
21. Foster, P. 1996. Observing schools. A methodological guide. London: Chapman.
22. Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
23. Ives, G., and G. Rowley. 2005. Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: PhD students' progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education 30, no 5: 535-55.
24. Jackson, T.E. 2001. The art and craft of 'gently socratic' inquiry. In Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking, ed. A. Costa. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25. Johnson, D.W., and R.T. Johnson. 2001. Co-operation and conflict: Effects on cognition and metacognition. In Developing minds. A resource book for teaching thinking, ed. A. Costa. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26. Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lee, A. 2006. Can you recognise a good facilitator when you see one? Educational Developments 7, no. 3: 7-10.
28. _. 2007a. Developing effective supervisors' concepts of research supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education 21, no. 4: 680-93.
29. _. 2007b. How can a mentor support experiential learning? Journal of Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 12, no. 3: 333-40.
30. Leonard, D. 2001. A woman's guide to doctoral studies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
31. Meyer, J. 2007. On the modelling of postgraduate students' conceptions of research. Presentation to the International Conference on Postgraduate Supervision, 'State of the art and the artists', Stellenbosch 23-26 April 2007.
32. Morton-Cooper, A., and A. Palmer. 2000. Mentoring, preceptorship and clinical supervision: A guide to professional support roles in clinical practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Neumann, R. 2007. Policy and practice in doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education 43, no. 4: 459-74.
34. Pearson, M., and A. Brew. 2002. Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 2: 135-50.
35. Pearson, M., and C. Kayrooz. 2004. Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice. International Journal for Academic Development 9, no. 1: 99-116.
36. Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell. 1999. Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
37. Stevenson, P., and A. Brand. 2006. Exploring the developmental impacts of completing a postgraduate certificate in learning and teaching. Educational Developments 7:3.
38. Taylor, S., and N. Beasley. 2005. A handbook for doctoral supervisors. London: Routledge.
39. Wisker, G. 2005. The good supervisor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
40. Wisker, G., G. Robinson, V. Trafford, E. Creighton, and M. Warnes. 2003. Recognising and overcoming dissonance in postgraduate student research. Studies in Higher Education 28, no. 1: 91-105.
41. Wisker, G., G. Robinson, and M. Shacham. 2007. Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44, no. 3: 301-20.