Effects of mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: The case of south korea

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 31-42

  Kim, Hyewon ^a   Lee, MiYoung ^b   Kim, Minjeong ^a  

^a Dankook University   (South Korea)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning outcomes; Collaborative learning processes; Mobile instant messaging; Mobile based collaborative learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901232870     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and m-learning project summary. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
3. Bollen, L., Eimler, S., & Hoppe, H. U. (2004). SMS-based discussions: Technology enhanced collaboration for a literature course. In J. Rochelle et al. (Eds), The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technology in Education 2004 (pp. 209-210). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE.
4. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Chen, G. D., Chang, C. K., & Wang, C. Y. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers & Education, 50(1), 77-79.
6. Chen, H.-R., & Huang, H.-L. (2010). User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: Design and analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (3), 70-77.
7. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by collaborative learning?. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
8. Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 542-560
9. Efklides, A (2008). Metacognition. Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and coregulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277-287.
10. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognitive and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3-14.
11. El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.
12. Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., Cuevas, H. M., & Bowers, C. A. (2003). Distributed coordination space: Toward a theory of distributed team process and performance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4, 340-364.
13. Guan, Y. H., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, F. K. (2004). On-line discussion on a virtual physics forum: A content analysis. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004 (pp. 4141-4146). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
14. Hara, N., Bonk, C.J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional science. 28(2), 115-152
15. Henri, F (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 115-136). New York, NY: Springer.
16. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia for higher education. In J. Pearce & A. Ellis (Eds), Proceedings of the Learning with Technology, Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 253-262). Melbourne, Australia: ASCILITE.
17. Holley, D., & Dobson, C. (2008). Encouraging student engagement in a blended learning environment: The use of contemporary learning spaces . Learning, Media and Technology, 33(2), 139-150.
18. Huang, J. J. S., Yang, S. J. H., Huang, Y.-M., & Hsiao, I. Y. T. (2010). Social learning networks: Build mobile learning networks based on collaborative services. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 78-92.
19. Hung, D., Looi, C.-K., & Koh, T.-S. (2004). Situated cognition and communities of practice: First-person "lived experiences" vs. third-person perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 193-200.
20. Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trend in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journal from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Education Technology, 42(4), E65-E70.
21. Johnston, J. H., Smith-Jentsch, K. A., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1997). Performance measurement tools for enhancing team decision-making. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2005). College students' perceived threat and preference for seeking help in traditional, distributed, and distance learning environments. Computers & Education, 48(3) pp. 383-395.
23. Korea Internet Security Agency (KISA). (2011). 2011 Korea Internet white paper. Retrieved March 17, 2013, from http://isis.nida.or.kr/eng/ebook/2011/2011WhitePaper/2011WhitePaper.html
24. Korea Internet Security Agency (KISA). (2012). 2011 Survey on the Internet usage. Retrieved March 17, 2013 from http://isis.kisa.or.kr/eng/board/?pageId=040100&bbsId=10&itemId=317
25. Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. (2001). An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 43-46). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lee, J. (2010). M-Learning as a challenge for cyber universities: The present and the future. Journal of Cyber Society & Culture, 1(1), 91-119
28. Lee, M, & Johnson, T. E. (2008). Understanding the effects of team cognition associated with complex engineering tasks: Dynamics of shared mental models, Task-SMM, and Team-SMM. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(3), 73-95.
29. Markett, C., Sánchez, I. A., Weber, S., & Tangney, B. (2006). Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the classroom. Computers & Education, 46(3), 280-293
30. Mathieu, J E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283.
31. Motiwalla, L. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Journal of Computer and Education, 49, 581-596.
32. Newman, D. R., Webb, B. R., & Cochrane, A. C. (1996). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), 56-77.
33. OECD. (2012). OECD broadband portal. Fixed and wireless broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants (June 2012). Retrieved March 20, 2013, from http://www.oecd.org/sti/broadband/oecdbroadbandportal.htm#Penetration
34. Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. (ED448444)
35. Park, S., Nam, M., & Cha, S. (2012). University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605
36. Patten, B, Arnedillo Sánchez, I., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers & Education, 46(3), 294-308.
37. Rau, P. L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L. M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 55(1), 1-22.
38. Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2006). Using ubiquitous computing to extend and enhance learning experiences. In M. van t'Hooft & K. Swan (Eds.), Ubiquitous Computing in Education: Invisible Technology, Visible Impact (pp. 329-348). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring social communication in computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 259-275.
40. Ryu, H., & Parsons, D. (2012). Risky business or sharing the load? Social flow in collaborative mobile learning. Computers & Education, 58, 707-720.
41. Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A (2005). Social interaction-What can it tell us about metacognitive and coregulation in learning?. European Psychologist, 10, 199-208.
42. Seppala, P., & Alamaki, H. (2003). Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 330-335.
43. Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009). Affective e-Learning: Using "emotional" data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 176-189.
44. Stott, K., & Walker, A. (1995). Teams: Teamwork and teambuilding. Prentice Hall, NY: Prentice Hall.
45. Stone, A., Briggs, J., & Smith, C. (2002). SMS and interactivity-Some results from the field, and its implications on effective uses of mobile technologies in education. In M. Milrad et als. (Eds), Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on the Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 147-151). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE.
46. Ting, Y. R. (2012). Using mobile technologies to create interwoven learning interactions: An intuitive design and its evaluation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 1-13.
47. Wu, W., Wu, Y. J, Chen, C., Kao, H., Lin, C., & Huang, S. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning Studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817-827.
48. Yengin, I., Karahoca, A., Karahoca, D., & Uzunboylu, H. (2011). Is SMS still alive for education: Analysis of educational potentials of SMS technology?. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1439-1445