Reinstating higher order properties of a study list by retrieving a list item

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 570-582

  Humphreys, Michael S ^a   Murray, Krista L ^a   Koh, Joyce Yanfang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Context; Control processes; Episodic memory; Retrieval; Semantic memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; EPISODIC MEMORY; HUMAN; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901037090     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0384-8     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anisfeld, M., & Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 171-179.
2. Annis, J., Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2013). Sources of interference in recognition testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1365-1376.
3. Aue, W. R., Criss, A. H., & Fischetti, N. W. (2012). Associative information in memory: Evidence from cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 109-222.
4. Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). "Fate" of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97-105. doi: 10. 1037/h0047507.
5. Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 231-248.
6. Chappell, M., & Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall. Psychological Review, 101, 103-128.
7. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22. doi: 10. 1037/h0046671.
8. Dennis, S., & Chapman, A. (2010). The inverse list length effect: A challenge for pure exemplar models of recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 416-424.
9. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic recognition memory. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 108. 2. 452.
10. Dennis, S., Lee, M. D., & Kinnell, A. (2008). Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 361-376.
11. Dillon, R. E., & Bittner, L. A. (1975). Analysis of retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 616-622. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(75)80048-X.
12. Dosher, B. A., & Rosedale, G. (1991). Judgments of semantic and episodic relatedness: Common time-course and failure of segregation. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 125-160.
13. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 102. 2. 211.
14. Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154. doi: 10. 1037/h0048509.
15. Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., & Birtwhistle, J. (1972). Retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 778-783. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(72)80012-4.
16. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X97000010.
17. Glenberg, A. M., & Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 3-15. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 12. 1. 3.
18. Hintzman, D. L. (2011). Research strategy in the study of memory: Fads, fallacies, and the search for the "coordinates of truth. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 253-271. doi: 10. 1177/1745691611406924.
19. Howard, M. W., Jing, B., Rao, V. A., Provyn, J. P., & Datey, A. V. (2009). Bridging the gap: Transitive associations between items presented in similar temporal contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 391-407.
20. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 923-941. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 25. 4. 923.
21. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299. doi: 10. 1006/jmps. 2001. 1388.
22. Humphreys, M. S. (2001). Proactive interference and complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 872-878. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 27. 3. 872.
23. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 96. 2. 208.
24. Humphreys, M. S., & Murray, K. L. (2011). Episodic, generalized, and semantic memory tests: Switching and strength effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 192-199.
25. Humphreys, M. S., Murray, K. L., & Maguire, A. M. (2009). Contexts and control operations used in accessing list-specific, generalized, and semantic memories. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 311-337.
26. Humphreys, M. S., Wiles, J., & Bain, J. D. (1993). Memory retrieval with two cues: Think of intersecting sets. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuropsychology-A silver jubilee (pp. 489-508). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Humphreys, M. S., Wiles, J., & Dennis, S. (1994). Toward a theory of human memory: Data structures and access processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 655-667.
28. Jacoby, L. L., Debner, J. A., & Hay, J. F. (2001). Proactive interference, accessibility bias, and process dissociations: Valid subjective reports of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 686-700. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 27. 3. 686.
29. Jung, J. (1962). Transfer of training as a function of degree of first-list learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 197-199.
30. Kilic, A., Criss, A. H., & Howard, M. W. (2013). A causal contiguity effect that persists across time scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 297-303.
31. Kimball, D. R., Smith, T. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2007). The fSAM model of false recall. Psychological Review, 114, 954-993. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 114. 4. 954.
32. Kinnell, A., & Dennis, S. (2011). The list length effect in recognition memory: An analysis of potential confounds. Memory & Cognition, 39, 348-363.
33. Kinnell, A., & Dennis, S. (2012). The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 311-325.
34. Lehman, M., & Malmberg, K. J. (2011). Overcoming the effects of intentional forgetting. Memory and Cognition, 39, 335-347.
35. Lehman, M., & Malmberg, K. J. (2013). A buffer model of encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychological Review, 120, 155-189. doi: 10. 1037/a0030851.
36. Maguire, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Lee, M. D. (2010). Global similarity accounts of embedded-category designs: Tests of the global matching models. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 131-148. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2010. 03. 007.
37. McCullers, J. C. (1965). Type of associative interference as a factor in verbal paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 12-16.
38. McElree, B. (2006). Accessing recent events. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 155-200). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Mensink, G. J. M., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 95. 4. 434.
40. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 826-837. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 29. 5. 826.
41. Neely, J. H., & Tse, C. S. (2009). Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1141-1172.
42. Nelson, D. L., Kitto, K., Galea, D., McEvoy, C. L., & Bruza, P. D. (2013). How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 797-819.
43. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved January 9, 2004, from http://w3. usf. edu/FreeAssociation/.
44. Palermo, D. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Paired-associate learning as a function of the strength of links in the associative chain. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 406-412.
45. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 88. 2. 93.
46. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385-408. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 95. 3. 385.
47. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 21. 4. 803.
48. Schwartz, G., Howard, M. W., Jing, B., & Kahana, M. J. (2005). Shadows of the past: Temporal retrieval effects in recognition memory. Psychological Science, 16, 898-904.
49. Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893-912. doi: 10. 1037/a0013396.
50. Shiffrin, R. M., Ratcliff, R., & Clark, S. E. (1990). The list-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 179-195. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 16. 2. 179.
51. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166. doi: 10. 3758/BF03209391.
52. Tehan, G. (2010). Associative relatedness enhances recall and produces false memories in immediate serial recall. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 266-272.
53. Tehan, G., & Humphreys, M. S. (1996). Cueing effects in short-term recall. Memory & Cognition, 24, 719-732. doi: 10. 3758/BF03201097.
54. Tehan, G., Humphreys, M. S., Tolan, G. A., & Pitcher, C. (2004). The role of context in producing item interactions and false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 107-119. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 30. 1. 107.
55. Underwood, B. J. (1983). Conceptual similarity and cumulative proactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 456-461.
56. van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded edition of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289-335. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2003. 10. 003.
57. Wickens, D. D., Moody, M. J., & Dow, R. (1981). The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 1-20. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 110. 1. 1.
58. Wickens, D. D., Moody, M. J., & Vidulich, M. A. (1985). Retrieval time as a function of memory set size, type of probes, and interference in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 154-164.
59. Wicklund, D. A., Palermo, D. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). The effects of associative strength and response hierarchy on paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 616-622. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(64)80011-6.
60. Wiles, J., Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Dennis, S. (1991). Direct memory access using two cues: Finding the intersection of sets in a connectionist model. In R. P. Lippman, J. E. Moody, & D. S. Touretzky (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 3 (pp. 635-641). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
61. Xu, J., & Malmberg, K. J. (2007). Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 526-544. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193292.
62. Yim, H., Dennis, S. J., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2013). The development of episodic memory. Psychological Science. doi: 10. 1177/0956797613487385. Advance online publication.
63. Zaromb, F. M., Howard, M. W., Dolan, E. D., Sirotin, Y. B., Tully, M., Wingfield, A., & Kahana, M. J. (2006). Temporal associations and prior list intrusions in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 792-804. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 32. 4. 792.