Associative information in memory: Evidence from cued recall

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 109-122

  Aue, William R ^a   Criss, Amy H ^a   Fischetti, Nicholas W ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative memory; Cued recall; Episodic memory; List discrimination; Memory models

Indexed keywords

EID: 81955162901     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson M.C., Neely J.H. Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. Memory 1996, 237-313. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US. E. Bjork, R.A. Bjork, E. Bjork, R.A. Bjork (Eds.).
2. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.A., Kessler B., Loftis B., et al. The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:445-459.
3. Benjamin A.S. Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamnemonic judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:874-879.
4. Clark S.E., Burchett R.R. Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22:55-62.
5. Clark S.E., Gronlund S.D. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:37-60.
6. Criss A.H. The representation of single items and associations in episodic memory. (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International B 2005, 65:6882.
7. Criss A.H., Shiffrin R.M. Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:1284-1297.
8. Criss A.H., Shiffrin R.M. List discrimination in associative recognition and implications for representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1199-1212.
9. Criss A.H., Aue W.R., Smith L. The effects of word frequency and context variability in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 64:119-132.
10. Diana R.A., Reder L.M., Arndt J., Park H. Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:1-21.
11. Diller D.E., Nobel P.A., Shiffrin R.M. An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:414-435.
12. Dunnett C.W. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatment groups with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1955, 50:1096-1121.
13. Dunnett C.W. New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 1965, 20:482-491.
14. Eich J.M. A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review 1982, 89:627-661.
15. Gillund G., Shiffrin R.M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review 1984, 91:1-67.
16. Gronlund S.D., Ratcliff R. Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:846-858.
17. Harbison J., Dougherty M.R., Davelaar E.J., Fayyad B. On the lawfulness of the decision to terminate memory search. Cognition 2009, 111:416-421.
18. Hintzman D.L. MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 1984, 16:96-101.
19. Hintzman D.L. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 1988, 95:528-551.
20. Hockley W.E., Consoli A. Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 1999, 27:657-664.
21. Hockley W.E., Cristi C. Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information. Memory & Cognition 1996, 24:202-216.
22. Hockley W.E., Cristi C. Tests of the separate retrieval of item and associative information using a frequency-judgement task. Memory & Cognition 1996, 24:796-811.
23. Howard M.W., Jing B., Rao V.A., Provyn J.P., Datey A.V. Bridging the gap: Transitive associations between items presented in similar temporal contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:391-407.
24. Humphreys M.S., Bain J.D., Pike R. Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic and procedural tasks. Psychological Review 1989, 96:208-233.
25. Humphreys M.S., Dennis S., Maguire A.M., Reynolds K., Bolland S.W., Hughes J.D. What you get out of memory depends on the question you ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:797-812.
26. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
27. Kahana M.J., Caplan J.B. Associative asymmetry in probed recall of serial lists. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:841-849.
28. Kelley R., Wixted J.T. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:701-722.
29. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123:297-315.
30. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review 1996, 103:490-517.
31. Koriat A., Levy-Sadot R. The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:34-53.
32. Kucera H., Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
33. Lund K., Burgess C. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 1996, 28:203-208.
34. Malmberg K.J., Xu J. On the flexibility and the fallibility of associative memory. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:545-556.
35. McClelland J.L., Chappell M. Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review 1998, 105:724-760.
36. Mensink G., Raaijmakers J.G. A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review 1988, 95:434-455.
37. Metcalfe J., Schwartz B.L., Joaquim S.G. The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:851-864.
38. Murdock B. A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review 1982, 89:609-626.
39. Murdock B. Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). Psychological Review 1997, 104:839-862.
40. Murnane K., Phelps M.P., Malmberg K. Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1999, 128:403-415.
41. Murnane K., Shiffrin R.M. Word repetitions in sentence recognition. Memory & Cognition 1991, 19:119-130.
42. Nobel P.A., Shiffrin R.M. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:384-413.
43. Overman A.A., Becker J.T. The associative deficit in older adult memory: Recognition of pairs is not improved by repetition. Psychology and Aging 2009, 24:501-506.
44. Postman L., Gray W. Maintenance of prior associations and proactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1977, 3:255-263.
45. Postman L., Stark K., Burns S. Sources of proactive inhibition on unpaced tests of retention. The American Journal of Psychology 1974, 87:33-56.
46. Raaijmakers J.G., Shiffrin R.M. Search of associative memory. Psychological Review 1981, 88:93-134.
47. Reder L.M. Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:90-138.
48. Reder L.M., Nhouyvanisvong A., Schunn C.D., Ayers M.S., Angstadt P., Hiraki K. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:294-320.
49. Schwartz B.L., Metcalfe J. Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:1074-1083.
50. Shiffrin R.M., Murnane K., Gronlund S., Roth M. On units of storage and retrieval. Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree symposium on cognition 1989, 25-68. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, England. C. Izawa, C. Izawa (Eds.).
51. Shiffrin R.M., Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM - Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:145-166.
52. Underwood B.J. Attributes of memory. Psychological Review 1969, 76:559-573.
53. Underwood B.J., Schulz R.W. Meaningfulness and verbal learning 1960, J.B. Lippincott, Oxford, England.
54. Xu J., Malmberg K.J. Modeling the effects of verbal- and nonverbal-pair strength on associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:526-544.