Visual context modulates potentiation of grasp types during semantic object categorization

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 645-651

  Kalénine, Solène ^a,b,e   Shapiro, Allison D ^a   Flumini, Andrea ^c   Borghi, Anna M ^c,d   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^a  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b University of Bologna ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

^e UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Concepts and categories; Embodied cognition; Stimulus response compatibility; Visual selective attention

Indexed keywords

AGED; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEMANTICS; VISION;

AGED; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84900524836     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0536-7     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395-419). NJ: Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
2. Apel JK, Cangelosi A, Ellis R, Goslin J, Fischer MH. (2012) Object affordance influences instruction span. Experimental Brain Research, 223(2), 199-206.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-45.
4. Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13(4), 370-4.
5. Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Natraj, N., & Wheaton, L. A. (2012). One hand, two objects: emergence of affordance in contexts. Brain and Cognition, 80(1), 64-73.
6. Botvinick, M. M., Buxbaum, L. J., Bylsma, L. M., & Jax, S. a. (2009). Toward an integrated account of object and action selection: a computational analysis and empirical findings from reaching-to-grasp and tool-use. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 671-83.
7. Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106(1), 27-58.
8. Buxbaum, L. J., & Kalénine, S. (2010). Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 201-18.
9. Caligiore, D., Borghi, A. M., Parisi, D., Ellis, R., Cangelosi, A., Baldassarre, G. (2013). How affordances associated with a distractor object affect compatibility effects: A study with the computational model TRoPICALS. Psychological Research, 77(1), 7-19.
10. Chambon, V., Domenech, P., Pacherie, E., Koechlin, E., Baraduc, P., & Farrer, C. (2011). What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding. PloS one, 6(2), e17133.
11. Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2011). When objects are close to me: affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 302-8.
12. Craighero, L., Bello, A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia, 40(5), 492-502.
13. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1673-92.
14. Ehrsson, H. H., Fagergren, A., Forssberg, H. (2001). Differential fronto-parietal activation depending on force used in a precision grip task: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85(6), 2613-2623.
15. Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91(4), 451-471.
16. Ellis R, Tucker M, Symes E, Vainio L. (2007). Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 33(3), 670-91.
17. Ellis, R., Swabey, D., Bridgeman, J., May, B., Tucker, M., & Hyne, A. (2013). Bodies and other visual objects: the dialectics of reaching toward objects. Psychological Research, 77(1), 31-39.
18. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-98.
19. Girardi, G., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 330-40.
20. Goslin, J., Dixon, T., Fischer, M. H., Cangelosi, A., & Ellis, R. (2012). Electrophysiological examination of embodiment in vision and action. Psychological Science, 23(2), 152-7.
21. Gronau, N., Neta, M., & Bar, M. (2008). Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 371-88.
22. Hannus, A., Cornelissen, F. W., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2005). Selection-for-action in visual search. Acta Psychologica, 118(1-2), 171-91.
23. Jax, S. a, & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition, 115(2), 350-5.
24. Jax, S. A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2013). Response interference between functional and structural object-related actions is increased in patients with ideomotor apraxia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 7(1), 12-8.
25. Kalénine, S., Mirman, D., Middleton, E. L., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2012). Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1274-95.
26. Lee, C., Middleton, E., Mirman, D., Kalénine, S., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2013). Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 257-70.
27. Mudrik, L., Lamy, D., & Deouell, L. Y. (2010). ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 507-17.
28. Myung, J., Blumstein, S. E., Yee, E., Sedivy, J. C., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks. Brain and Language, 112(2), 101-12.
29. Pavese, A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2002). Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action. Visual Cognition, 9(4), 559-590.
30. Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 63(11), 2190-201.
31. Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A. R., Whyte, J., & Klein, M. G. (2005). A patient registry for cognitive rehabilitation research: a strategy for balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(9), 1807-14.
32. Shen, K., & Paré, M. (2011). Neural basis of feature-based contextual effects on visual search behavior. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 91.
33. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Jackson, S. R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor effects. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
34. Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 493-8.
35. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830-46.
36. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 769-800.
37. Vainio L, Ellis R, Tucker M, Symes E (2006). Manual Asymmetries In Visually Primed Grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 173(3) 395-406.
38. Wurm, M. F., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2012). The context-object-manipulation triad: cross talk during action perception revealed by fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(7), 1548-59.
39. Yoon, E. Y., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2010). The paired-object affordance effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 812-24.