Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Sobuh, Mohammad M D ^a,b   Kenney, Laurence P J ^b   Galpin, Adam J ^b   Thies, Sibylle B ^b   McLaughlin, Jane ^c   Kulkarni, Jai ^c   Kyberd, Peter ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c WITHINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amputee; Design evaluation; Myoelectric; Prosthesis; Upper limb; Visuomotor behaviour

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAZE; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; ARM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EYE FIXATION; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

ADULT; AMPUTEES; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS;

EID: 84900403290     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-72     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bernstein's levels of construction of movements applied to upper limb prosthetics. Bongers RM, Kyberd P, Bouwsema H, Kenney L, Plettenburg DH, Van der Sluis CK, J Pros Orth 2012 24 67 76 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3182532419
2. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. McFarland LV, Hubbard Winkler SL, Heinemann AW, Jones M, Esquenazi A, J Rehabil Res Dev 2010 47 299 316 10.1682/JRRD.2009.03.0027 20803400
3. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Østlie K, Lesjø IM, Franklin RJ, Garfelt B, Skjeldal OH, Magnus P, Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012 7 1 10 10.3109/17483107.2010.544369 21184625
4. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Biddiss E, Chau T, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007 86 977 987 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c 18090439
5. Sensory substitution in prosthetics. Lundborg G, Rosen B, Hand Clin 2001 17 481 488 11599215
6. Motion normalized proportional control for improved pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Scheme E, Lock B, Hargrove L, Hill W, Kuraganti U, Englehart K, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2013 22 149 157
7. The Southampton Hand: an intelligent myoelectric prosthesis. Kyberd PJ, Chappell PH, J Rehabil Res Dev 1994 31 326 334 7869280
8. On the shared control of an EMG-controlled prosthetic hand: analysis of user-prosthesis interaction. Cipriani C, Zaccone F, Micera S, Carrozza MC, IEEE Trans Robot 2008 24 170 184
9. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 776 783 10.1053/apmr.2002.32737 12048655
10. Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition. Fougner A, Scheme E, Chan AD, Englehart K, Stavdahl O, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011 19 644 651 21846608
11. Spatial filtering for robust myoelectric control. Hahne JM, Graimann B, Muller KR, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012 59 1436 1443 22374342
12. Findlay JM, Gilchrist ID, Active vision: the psychology of looking and seeing Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003
13. Orienting of attention. Posner MI, Q J Exp Psychol 1980 32 3 25 10.1080/00335558008248231 7367577
14. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Eriksen CW, St James JD, Percept Psychophys 1986 40 225 240 10.3758/BF03211502 3786090
15. Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. Johansson RS, Westling G, Backstrom A, Flanagan JR, J Neurosci 2001 21 6917 6932 11517279
16. The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Land M, Mennie N, Rusted J, Perception 1999 28 1311 1328 10.1068/p2935 10755142
17. Oculomotor behavior and perceptual strategies in complex tasks. Pelz JB, Canosa R, Vision Res 2001 41 3587 3596 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00245-0 11718797
18. Eye-hand coordination during learning of a novel visuomotor task. Sailer U, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS, J Neurosci 2005 25 8833 8842 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 2658-05.2005 16192373
19. Eye gaze patterns differentiate novice and experts in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment. Law B, Atkins MS, Kirkpatrick AE, Lomax AJ, Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications New York, USA: ACM Press 2004 41 48
20. Principles of sensorimotor learning. Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J, Flanagan JR, Nat Rev Neurosci 2011 12 739 751 22033537
21. Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. Bouwsema H, Kyberd P, Hill W, Van der Schans CP, Bongers R, J Rehabil Res Dev 2012 49 1331 1348 10.1682/JRRD.2011.09.0179 23408215
22. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. Saunders I, Vijayakumar S, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 60 72 10.1186/1743-0003-8-60 22032545
23. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010 25 523 529 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.011
24. Using multiple outcome measures to determine skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use. Bouwsema H, Kyberd PJ, Hill W, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, Proceedings of MEC Symposium Fredericton, Canada: University of New Brunswick 2011
25. The role of order of practice in learning to handle an upper-limb prosthesis. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 1759 1764 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.046 18675393
26. Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hand. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010 91 1442 1446 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.025 20801265
27. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis Human Kinetics: Champaign, Illinois 4 2005
28. Functional outcomes in the WHO-ICF model: establishment of the upper limb prosthetic outcome measures group. Hill W, Stavdahl Ø Hermansson LN, Kyberd P, Swanson S, Hubbard S, J Pros Orth 2009 21 115 119 10.1097/JPO. 0b013e3181a1d2dc
29. Changes in hand function with age and normative unimpaired scores when measured with the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. Metcalf CD, Woodward H, Wright V, Chappell PH, Burridge JH, Yule VT, Hand Ther 2008 13 79 83
30. Comparison of linear accelerations from three measurement systems during "reach & grasp" Thies SB, Tresadern P, Kenney L, Howard D, Goulermas JY, Smith C, Rigby J, Med Eng Phys 2007 29 967 972 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.10.012 17126061
31. Eye movements in natural behavior. Hayhoe M, Ballard D, Trends Cogn Sci 2005 9 188 194 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.009 15808501
32. Look-ahead fixations: anticipatory eye movements in natural tasks. Mennie N, Hayhoe M, Sullivan B, Exp Brain Res 2007 179 427 442 10.1007/s00221-006- 0804-0 17171337
33. Case studies to demonstrate the range of applications of the Southampton hand assessment procedure. Kyberd P, Murgia A, Gasson M, Tjerks T, Metcalf CD, Chappell PH, Warwick K, Lawson SE, Barnhill T, Br J Occup Ther 2009 72 212 218
34. Learning curves of Southampton hand assessment procedure tasks in novice prosthetic users. Vasluian E, Reinders-Messelink H, Bongers R, Dijkstra P, Burgerhof J, Van der Sluis C, 14th International Congress of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics-ISPO Hyderabad, India: KW Conferences Pvt Ltd 2013