Study of the influence of acid etching treatments on the superficial characteristics of Ti

Materials Research

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 373-380

  Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos ^a   Martins, Maximiliano Delany ^a  

^a CENTRO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO DA TECNOLOGIA NUCLEAR   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acid etching; Surface characterization; Surface modification; Titanium

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900389637     PISSN: 15161439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392014005000042     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Thomas KA and Cook S. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1985; 19(8):875-901. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820190802
2. Vervaeke S, Collaert B and De Bruyn H. The effect of implant surface modifications on survival and bone loss of immediately loaded implants in the edentulous mandible. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2013; 28(5):1352-1357. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3200
3. Boukari A, Francius G and Hemmerle J. AFM force spectroscopy of the fibrinogen adsorption process onto dental implants. Journal of Biomedical Material Research. 2006; 78(3):466-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30778
4. Park YJ, Song YH, An JH, Song HJ and Anusavice KJ. Cytocompatibility of pure metals and experimental binary titanium alloys for implant materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2013; 41(12):1251-1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jdent.2013.09.003
5. Butz F, Ogawa T and Nishimura I. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2011; 26(4):746-751.
6. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann SG, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH and Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1991; 25(7):889-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ jbm.820250708
7. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE and Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A removal torque study in the rabbit. Clinical Oral Implant Research. 2001; 12(4):350-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004350.x
8. Souza FA, Queiroz TP, Guastaldi AC, Garcia-Júnior IR, Magro-Filho O, Nishioka RS et al. Comparative in vivo study of commercially pure Ti implants with surfaces modified by laser with and without silicate deposition: biomechanical and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B Applied Biomaterials. 2013; 101(1):76-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32818
9. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T and Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2000; 2(3):120-128. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x
10. Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T and Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative surface analysis of 4 dental implant systems. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B Applied Biomaterials. 2004; 69(1):46-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ jbm.b.20021
11. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS and Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. International Journal of Periodontology and Restorative Dentistry. 1999; 19(2):117-129.
12. He FM, Yang GL, Zhao SF and Cheng ZP. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of rough titanium implants treated with hydrofluoric acid/nitric acid solution in rabbit tibia. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2011; 26(1):115-122.
13. Zareidoost A, Yousefpour M, Ghaseme B and Amanzadeh A. The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2012 Jun; 23(6):1479-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4611-9
14. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piattelli M and Piattelli A. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2000; 15(6):779-784.
15. Cho SA and Park KT. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(20):3611-3617. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00218-7
16. Iwaya Y, Machigashira M, Kanbara K, Miyamoto M, Noguchi K, Izumi Y et al. Surface properties and biocompatibility of acid-etched titanium. Dental Materials Journal. 2008; 27(3):415-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.415
17. Yang GL, He FM, Yang XF, Wang XX and Zhao SF. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics. 2008; 106(4):516-524. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03. 017
18. Carvalho DR, Carvalho PS, Magro O F, De Mello JD, Beloti MM and Rosa AL. Characterization and in vitro cytocompatibility of an acid-etched titanium surface. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2010; 21(1):3-11.
19. Chrcanovic BR, Pedrosa AR and Martins MD. Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants. Materials Research. 2012; 15(3):372-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1516-14392012005000035
20. Daugaard H, Elmengaard B, Bechtold JE and Soballe K. Bone growth enhancement in vivo on press-fit titanium alloy implants with acid etched microtexture. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A. 2008; 87(2):434-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ jbm.a.31748
21. Chrcanovic BR, Leão NLC and Martins MD. Influence of different acid etchings on the superficial characteristics of Ti sandblasted with Al2O3. Materials Research. 2013; 16(5):1006-1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516- 14392013005000067
22. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R and Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1995; 29(12):1567-1575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ jbm.820291213
23. Albrektsson T and Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004; 17(5):536-543.
24. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. Journal of Dental Research. 2004; 83(7):529-533. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/ 154405910408300704
25. Hansson S. Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: a critical analysis. Journal of Biomechanics. 2000; 33(10):1297-1303. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00045-2
26. Perrin D, Szmukler-Moncler S, Echikou C, Pointaire P and Bernard JP. Bone response to alteration of surface topography and surface composition of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002; 13(5):465-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130504.x
27. Frank MJ, Walter MS, Lyngstadaas SP, Wintermantel E and Haugen HJ. Hydrogen content in titanium and a titanium-zirconium alloy after acid etching. Materials Science and Engineering: C Materials for Biological Applications. 2013; 33(3):1282-1288. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.12.027
28. Videm K, Lamolle S, Monjo M, Ellingsen JE, Lyngstadaas SP and Haugen HJ. Hydride formation on titanium surfaces by cathodic polarization. Applied Surface Science. 2008; 255(5):3011-3015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.090
29. Castilho GAA, Martins MD and Macedo WAA. Surface characterization of titanium based dental implants. Brazilian Journal of Physics. 2006; 36(3b):1004-1008. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0103-97332006000600055
30. Nam SH, Choi JW, Cho SJ, Kimt KS and Boo JH. Growth of TiO2 anti-reflection layer on textured Si (100) wafer substrate by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition method. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2011; 11(8):7315-7318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4813