Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 516-524

  Yang, Guo li ^a   He, Fu ming ^a   Yang, Xiao feng ^a   Wang, Xiao xiang ^b   Zhao, Shi fang ^a  

^a Stomatology Hospital   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL ETCHING; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMUR; IMPLANT; METHODOLOGY; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMUR; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 55049137362     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Cochran D.L., Buser D., Ten Bruggenkate C.M., Weingart D., Taylor T.M., et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 144-153
2. Bornstein M.M., Lussi A., Schmid B., Belser U.C., and Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 (2003) 659-666
3. Payne A.G.T., Tawse-Smith A., Duncan W.D., and Kumara R. Conventional and early loading of unsplinted ITI implants supporting mandibular overdentures Two-year results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 603-609
4. Salvi G.E., Gallini G., and Lang N.P. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) it is implants in the posterior mandible: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 (2004) 142-149
5. Buser D., Mericske-Stern R., Bernard J.P., Behneke A., Behneke N., Hirt H.P., et al. Long-term evaluation of nonsubmerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 8 (1997) 161-162
6. Naert I., Koutsikakis G., Duyck J., Quirynen M., Jacobs R., and van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 381-389
7. Davarpanah M., Martinez H., Etienne D., Zabalegui I., Mattout P., Chiche F., et al. A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 (2002) 820-828
8. Sullivan D.Y., Sherwood R.L., and Porter S.S. Long-term performance of Osseotite implants: a 6-year clinical follow-up. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22 (2001) 326-334
9. Friberg B., Grondahl K., Lekholm U., and Branemark P.I. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Branemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2 (2000) 184-189
10. Bahat O. Branemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 (2000) 646-653
11. Branemark P.I. Introduction to osseointegration. In: Branemark P.I., Zarb, and Gand Albrektsson T. (Eds). Tissue-integration prosthesis. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry (1985), Quintessence, Chicago 11-76
12. Davies J.E. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 67 (2003) 932-949
13. Davies J.E. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 11 (1998) 391-401
14. Park J.Y., and Davies J.E. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 11 (2000) 530-539
15. Keller J.C., Schneider G.B., Stanford C.M., and Kellogg B. Effects of implant microtopography on osteoblast cell attachment. Implant Dent 12 (2003) 175-181
16. Klokkevold P.R., Johnson P., Dadgostari S., Caputo A., Davies J.E., and Nishimura R.D. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 (2001) 350-357
17. Vernino A.R., Kohles S.S., Holt R.A., Lee H.M., Caudill R.F., and Kenealy J.N. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 22 (2002) 399-407
18. Roughenedori T., Del Fabbro M., Feldman S., Vincenzi G., Sullivan D., Rossi R.J., et al. A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 154-161
19. Stach R.M., and Kohles S.S. A meta-analysis examining the clinical survivability of machined-surfaced and osseotite implants in poor-quality bone. Implant Dent 12 (2003) 87-96
20. Li D., Ferguson S.J., Beutler T., Cochran D.L., Sittig C., Hirt H.P., et al. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 60 (2002) 325-332
21. Schenk R.K., and Buser D. Osseointegration: a reality. Periodontol 2000 17 (1998) 22-35
22. Cochran D.L. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 70 (1999) 1523-1539
23. Szmukler-Moncler S., Perrin D., Ahossi V., Magnin G., and Bernard J.P. Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B (2004) 149-159
24. He F.M., Zhao S.S., Liu L., Chen S., Shen Z.L., and Wang X.X. The preparation of the multilevel holes and analysis of the pure titanium surface. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 14 (2005) 639-644
25. Nkenke E., Kloss F., Wiltfang J., Schultze-Mosgau S., Radespiel-Tröger M., Loos K., et al. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 595-602
26. Suh J.-Y., Jeung O.-C., Choi B.-J., and Park J.-W. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibias. Clin Oral Implants Res 18 (2007) 62-69
27. Gotfredsen K., Wennerberg A., Johansson C., Skovgaard L.T., and Hjorting-Hansen E. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 29 (1995) 1223-1231
28. Martin J.Y., Schwartz Z., Hummert T.W., Schraub D.M., Simpson J., Lankford J., et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 29 (1995) 389-401
29. Buser D., Schenk R.K., Steinemann S., Fiorellini J.P., Fox C.H., and Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25 (1991) 889-902
30. Pilliar R.M., Deporter D.A., Watson P.A., and Valiquette N. Dental implant design: effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 25 (1991) 467-483
31. Hansson S., and Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 32 (1999) 829-836
32. Klokkevold P.R., Nishimura R.D., Adachi M., and Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 8 (1997) 442-447
33. Buser D., Nydegger T., Oxland T., Cochran D.L., Schenk R.K., Hirt H.P., et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 45 (1999) 75-83
34. He F.M., Liu L., Zhao S.F., Zhao S.S., Chen S., and Wang X.X. Fast formation of biomimetic apatite coatings on pure porous titanium implant's surface. J Biomed Engineering 24 (2007) 806-811
35. He F.M., Chen S., Zhao S.S., Li L., Wang X.X., and Zhao S.F. Analysis of apposition on differently treated implant surface at early stage of implantation. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 35 (2006) 472-478
36. Kokubo T. Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications. Biomaterials 12 (1991) 155-163
37. Hench L.L. Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 81 (1998) 1705-1728
38. Boyan B.D., Batzer R., Kieswetter K., Liu Y., Cochran D.L., Szmuckler-Moncler S., et al. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 39 (1998) 77-85
39. Ericsson I., Johansson C.B., Bystedt H., and Norton M.R. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 5 (1994) 202-206
40. Celletti R., Marinho V.C., Traini T., Orsini G., Bracchetti G., Perrotti V., et al. Bone contact around osseointegrated implants: a histologic study of acid-etched and machined surfaces. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16 (2006) 131-143
41. Cochran D.L., Schenk R.K., Higginbottom F.L., and Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 40 (1998) 1-11
42. Osborn J.E., and Newesely H. Dynamic aspects of the implant-bone interface. In: Heimke G. (Ed). Dental implants: materials and systems (1980), Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen 111-123
43. Albrektsson T., and Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine 10 (2001) S96-S101
44. Davies J. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 67 (2003) 932-949
45. Perrin D., Szmukler-Moncler S., Echikou C., Pointaie P., and Bernard J. Bone response to alteration of surface topography and surface composition of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 465-469