Comparative in vivo study of commercially pure Ti implants with surfaces modified by laser with and without silicate deposition: Biomechanical and scanning electron microscopy analysis

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 101 B, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 76-84

  Souza, Francisley A ^a   Queiroz, Thallita P ^a   Guastaldi, Antônio C ^a   Garcia Júnior, Idelmo R ^a   Magro Filho, Osvaldo ^a   Nishioka, Renato S ^a   Sisti, Karin E ^b   Sonoda, Celso K ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b Medical School   (Brazil)

Author keywords

biomechanics; bone remodeling; dental implants; SEM techniques; surface modification

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; DENTAL PROSTHESES; DEPOSITION; ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; LASER BEAMS; METAL IMPLANTS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SILICATES; SODIUM COMPOUNDS; SURFACE TREATMENT;

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; BONE IMPLANT INTERACTIONS; BONE REMODELING; COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUMS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY PROPERTIES; SCANNING ELECTRONS; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; X-RAY ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY;

SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; PENTABIOTIC; PYRAZOLONE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE SODIUM; SODIUM DERIVATIVE; SODIUM DIPYRONE; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMPLANTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; RABBIT; ROUGHNESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPECTROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TORQUE; X RAY ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 84871386803     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32818     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brånemark PI,., Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B,. Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials 1983; 4: 25-28. (Pubitemid 13131826)
2. Carvalho PSP, Ponzoni D,. Aspectos biolõgicos da osseointegração. In:, Gomes, LA,. Implantes osseointegrados: técnica e arte. São Paulo: Ed. Santos; 2002. p 1-9.
3. Gottlander M, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Radin S, Ducheyne P,. Bone tissue reactions to an electrophoretically applied calcium phosphate coating. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 551-557. (Pubitemid 27156269)
4. Davies JE, Hosseini MM,. Histodynamics of endosseous wound healing. In:, Davies JE, editor. BKTBone engineering. Toronto; 2000: 1-14.
5. Davies JE,. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 932-940.
6. Roberts WE,. Bone tissue interface. J Dent Educ 1988; 52: 804-809.
7. Watzek G, Zechner W, Ulm C, Tangl S, Tepper G, Watzek G., Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: A preliminary study in baboons. J Clin Oral Impl. Res 2005; 16: 408-416. (Pubitemid 43961020)
8. Shibli JA, Grassi S, de Figueiredo LC, Feres M, Marcantônio E Jr, Lezzi G, Piatelli A,. Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: A histological study in human jaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 80: 377-385.
9. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A,. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 7: 536-543. (Pubitemid 39360697)
10. Klokkevold PR, Jhonson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD,. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 350-357. (Pubitemid 33723202)
11. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T, et al. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 21-24.
12. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran D, Nolte LP,. Removal torque values of titanium Implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1998; 13: 611-619. (Pubitemid 128505852)
13. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H,. Influence of surface on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 889-902.
14. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio EJR,. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: Biomechanical study in rabbit tibiae. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 1706-1715.
15. Veis AA, Trisi P, Papadimitriou S, Tsirlis AT, Parissis NA, Desiris AK, Lazzara RJ,. Osseointegration of osseotite and machined titanium implants in autogenous bone graft. A histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 54-61. (Pubitemid 38686945)
16. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJA,. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 24-30.
17. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A,. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 442-447. (Pubitemid 127688532)
18. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL,. A human histologic analysis of ossetite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999; 19: 117-129.
19. Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rao W, Rebaudi A,. Bone-implant contact and bone quality: Evaluation of expected and actual bone contact on machined and ossetite implant surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 535-545.
20. Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS,. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 945-956. (Pubitemid 37038528)
21. Stach RM, Kohles SS,. A meta-analysis examining the clinical survivability of machined surface and ossetite in poor quality bone. Implant Dent 2003; 12: 87-96.
22. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Müller WD, Karcher H,. Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces-A comparative study. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1067-1073. (Pubitemid 30145698)
23. Lavisse L, Grevey D, Langlade C, Vannes B,. The early stage of the laser induced oxidation of titanium substrates. Appl surface Sci 2002; 186: 150-155. (Pubitemid 34234701)
24. Cho AS, Jung SK,. A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4859-4863.
25. 4 laser irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 2007; 253: 9203-9208. (Pubitemid 47320839)
26. Aparecida AH, Fook MV, Guastaldi AC,. Biomimetic apatite formation on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) using modified biomimetic solution. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 1215-1222.
27. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M,. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2161-2175. (Pubitemid 36434034)
28. Shepers ET,. Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range: A new material for the repair of bone defects. Implant Dent 1993; 2: 151-156.
29. Faeda, RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E JR,. Evaluation of titanium implants with surface modification by laser beam. Biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23: 137-143.
30. Sandrini E, Giordano C, Busini V, Signorelli E, Cigada A,. Apatite formation and cellular response of a novel bioactive titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 1225-1237. (Pubitemid 46795221)
31. Cooper LF,. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 85: 522-534.
32. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T,. Structural influence from calcium phosphate coatings and its possible effect on enhanced bone integration. Acta Odontol Scand 2009; 67: 333-340.
33. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE,. Early healing of nanothickness bioceramic coating on dental implants. An experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Applied Biomater 2009; 88B: 387-393.
34. Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA,. Bone healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 261-271. (Pubitemid 128657999)
35. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE,. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 62-71.
36. Moroni A, Faldini C, Marchetti S, Manca M, Consoli V, Gianini S,. Improvement of the bone pin interface strength in osteoporotic bone with use hydroxyapatite-coated tapered external-fixation pin. A prospective randomized clinical study of wrist fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83A: 717-721.
37. Son WW, Zhu X, Shin HI, Ong JL, Kim KH,. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized-hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Applied Biomater 2003; 66B: 520-525. (Pubitemid 37517123)
38. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, Snetivy D, Nolte LP,. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with sandblasted an acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res B Applied Biomater 1999; 45B: 75-83. (Pubitemid 29114154)
39. Fernandes EL, Unikowski IL, Teixeira ER, Costa NP, Shinkay RS,. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: A removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 886-892.