Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: A critical analysis

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1297-1303

  Hansson, Stig ^a,b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b Astra Tech AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone implant; Interfacial shear strength; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

BONE; ESTIMATION; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); INTERFACES (MATERIALS); INTERFACIAL ENERGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ANCHORAGE; INTERFACIAL SHEAR STRENGTH;

BIOMECHANICS;

BONE STRENGTH; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMPLANT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BONE AND BONES; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0034308347     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00045-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Albrektsson T., Brånemark P.-I., Hansson H.-A., Ivarsson B., Jönsson U. Ultrastructural analysis of the interface zone of titanium and gold implants. Advances in Biomaterials. 4:1982;167-177.
2. Albrektsson T., Hansson H.-A., Ivarsson B. Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants. Biomaterials. 6:1985;97-101.
3. Albrektsson T., Hansson H.-A. An ultrastructural characterization of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or stainless steel surfaces. Biomaterials. 7:1986;201-205.
4. Buser D., Nydegger T., Oxland T., Cochran D.L., Schenk R.K., Hirt H.P., Snétivy D., Nolte L-P. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 45:1999;75-83.
5. Cohen J. Tissue reactions to metals - the influence of surface finish. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 43-A:1961;687-699.
6. Currey J.D. Differences in the tensile strength of bone of different histological types. Journal of Anatomy. 93:1959;87-95.
7. Currey J.D. The mechanical consequences of variation in the mineral content of bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 2:1969;1-11.
8. Feighan J.E., Goldberg V.M., Davy D., Parr J.A., Stevenson S. The influence of surface blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 77-A:1995;1380-1395.
9. 2-blasted titanium implants. Clinical Oral Implants Resesearch. 3:1992;77-84.
10. Hansson H.-A., Albrektsson T., Brånemark P.-I. Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 50:1983;108-113.
11. Hansson S. The implant neck. smooth or provided with retention elements A biomechanical approach. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 10:1999;394-405.
12. Hansson, S., Norton, M., 1997. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone anchored implants: a biomechanical approach. In: Hansson, S. (Ed.), Towards an Optimized Dental Implant and Implant Bridge Design: A Biomechanical Approach. Thesis Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
13. Hansson S, Norton M The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone anchored implants. A mathematical model. Journal of Biomechanics. 32:1999;829-836.
14. Johansson C., Lausmaa J., Ask M., Hansson H.-A., Albrektsson T. Ultrastructural differences of the interface zone between bone and Ti6Al4. V or commercially pure titanium Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 11:1989;3-8.
15. Johansson C., Hansson H.-A., Albrektsson T. Qualitative, interfacial study between bone and tantalum, niobium or commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials. 11:1990;277-280.
16. Johansson C.B., Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2:1991;24-29.
17. Johansson C.B., Sennerby L., Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 6:1991;437-441.
18. Johansson, C.B., Albrektsson, T., Thomsen, P., Sennerby, L., Lodding, A., Odelius, H., 1991b. Tissue reactions to Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium alloy. In: Johansson C.B. On Tissue Reactions to Metal Implants. Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
19. Linder L., Albrektsson T., Brånemark P.-I., Hansson H.-A., Ivarsson B., Jönsson U., Lundström I. Electron microscopic analysis of the bone- titanium interface. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 54:1983;45-52.
20. Listgarten M.A., Buser D., Steinemann S.G., Donath K., Lang N.P., Weber H.P. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated epoxy resin implants and bone or gingiva. Journal of Dental Research. 71:1991;364-371.
21. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. Journal of Biomechanics. 8:1975;393-405.
22. Sennerby L., Ericson L.E., Thomsen P., Lekholm U., Åstrand P. Structure of the bone-titanium interface in retrieved clinical oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2:1991;103-111.
23. Sennerby L., Thomsen P., Ericson L.E. Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone. Part II: ultrastructuralobservations. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 4:1993;494-502.
24. Steflik D.E., Hanes P.J., Sisk A.L., Parr G.R., Song M.T., Lake F.T., McKinney R.V. Transmission electron microscopic and high voltage electron microscopic observations of the bone and osteocyte activity adjacent to unloaded dental implants placed in dogs. Journal of Periodontology. 63:1992;443-452.
25. Steflik D.E., Sisk A.L., Parr G.R., Gardner L.K., Hanes P.J., Lake F.T., Berkery D.J., Brewer P. Osteogenesis at the dental implant interface. High-voltage electron microscopic and conventional transmission electron microscopic observations Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 27:1993;791-800.
26. Stout, K.-J., Sullivan, P.J., Dong, W.P., Mainsah, E., Luo, N., Mathia, T., Zahouani, H., 1993. The development of methods for the characterization of roughness in three dimensions. EUR 15178 EN of commission of the European Communities, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
27. Thomas T.R. Characterization of surface roughness. Precision Engineering. 3:1981;97-104.
28. Thomas K.A., Cook S.D. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 19:1985;875-901.
29. Vose G.P. The relation of microscopic mineralization to intrinsic bone strength. Anatomical Record. 144:1962;31-36.
30. Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. 1996;Thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
31. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Andersson B., Krol J.J. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 6:1995;24-30.
32. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Andersson B. An animal study of c.p. titanium screws with different surface topographies. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 6:1995;302-309.
33. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Johansson C., Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials. 17:1996;15-22.
34. Whitehouse D.J. Handbook of surface metrology. 1994;Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol.
35. Wilke H.-J., Claes L., Steineman S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. Advances in Biomaterials. 9:1990;309-314.
36. Wiskott H.W.A., Belser U.C. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces. a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone Clinical Oral Implants Research. 10:1999;429-444.
37. Young J.Z. The Life of Mammals. 1957;Oxford University Press, Oxford.