Influence of different acid etchings on the superficial characteristics of Ti Sandblasted with Al2O3

Materials Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1006-1014

  Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos ^a   Leão, Nathalia Lorrayne Costa ^a   Martins, Maximiliano Delany ^a  

^a CENTRO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO DA TECNOLOGIA NUCLEAR   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acid etching; Aluminum oxide; Sandblasting; Surface modification; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ACID ETCHING; ALUMINUM OXIDES; CONTROL SAMPLES; GRAZING INCIDENCE; ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS; SANDBLASTING; TITANIUM HYDRIDE; TITANIUM SURFACES;

ALUMINA; DENTAL PROSTHESES; ETCHING; SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ALUMINUM;

EID: 84890072482     PISSN: 15161439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392013005000067     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I and Lindhe J. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2005; 32(9):925-932. PMid:16104954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1600-051X.2005.00747.x
2. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA and Valiquette N. Dental implant design: Effect on bone remodeling. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1991; 25(4):467-483. PMid:2050711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250405
3. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M and Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1997; 8(6):442-447. PMid:9555202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080601.x
4. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran D, Schenk RK, Hirt HP et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1999; 45(2):75-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:275::AID-JBM13.0.CO;2-P
5. Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Magnin G and Bernard JP. Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2004; 68(2):149-159. PMid:14737762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm. b.20003
6. Fu J, Hu Y, Guo Z, Zhang Y, Hao Y and Li S. Effect of surface micro-topography of titanium material on the behaviors of rabbit osteoblast in vitro. Applied Surface Science 2008; 255(2):286-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.apsusc.2008.06.064
7. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T and Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clinical Implants Dentistry and Related Research. 2000; 2(3):120-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x
8. Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, Belser U and Samson J. Histological and SEM analysis of reverse-torqued Branemark and ITI implants in the canine mandible and maxilla. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Osseointegration; 2002; Dallas. Dallas; 2002.
9. Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T and Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative surface analysis of 4 dental implant systems. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2004; 69(1):46-57. PMid:15015209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.20021
10. Wennerberg A and Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009; 20(Suppl 4):172-184. PMid:19663964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009. 01775.x
11. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS and Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. International Journal of Periodontology and Restorative Dentistry. 1999; 19(2):3-16.
12. Baker DA, London RM and O'Neil RB. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: A comparative study in rabbits. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1998; 14(5):722-728.
13. Piattelli A, Degidi M, Paolantonio M, Mangano C and Scarano A. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(22):4081-4089. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0142-9612(03)00300-4
14. Canabarro A, Diniz MG, Paciornik S, Carvalho L, Sampaio EM, Beloti MM et al. High concentration of residual aluminum oxide on titanium surface inhibits extracellular matrix mineralization. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A. 2008; 87(3):588-597. PMid:18186053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31810
15. Darvell BW, Samman N, Luk WK, Clark RK and Tideman H. Contamination of titanium castings by aluminum oxide blasting. Journal of Dentistry. 1995; 23(5):319-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)00003-X
16. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piattelli M and Piattelli A. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2000; 15(6):779-784. PMid:11151575.
17. Cho SA and Park KT. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(20):3611-3617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00218-7
18. Carvalho DR, Carvalho PS, Magro Filho O, De Mello JD, Beloti MM and Rosa AL. Characterization and in vitro cytocompatibility of an acid-etched titanium surface. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2010; 21(1):3-11. PMid:20464314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000100001
19. Yang GL, He FM, Yang XF, Wang XX and Zhao SF. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics. 2008; 106(4):516-524. PMid:18602288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tripleo.2008.03.017
20. Iwaya Y, Machigashira M, Kanbara K, Miyamoto M, Noguchi K, Izumi Y et al. Surface properties and biocompatibility of acid-etched titanium. Dental Materials Journal. 2008; 27(3):415-421. PMid:18717170. http://dx.doi.org/10. 4012/dmj.27.415
21. Chrcanovic BR, Pedrosa AR and Martins MD. Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants. Materials Research. 2012; 15(3):372-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1516-14392012005000035
22. Hruska AR and Borelli P. Quality criteria for pure titanium casting, laboratory soldering, intraoral welding, and a device to aid in making uncontaminated castings. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1991; 66(4):561-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90524-Z
23. Salthouse JN and Matlaga BF. Effects of implant surface on cellular activity and evaluation of histocompatibility. In: Winter GD, Leray JI and De Groot K, editors. Evaluation of biomaterials. London: Wiley; 1980.
24. Al Jabbari YS, Zinelis S and Eliades G. Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys. Dental Materials Journal. 2012; 31(2):249-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-210
25. Wang CS, Chen KK, Tajima K, Nagamatsu Y, Kakigawa H and Kozono Y. Effects of sandblasting media and steam cleaning on bond strength of titanium-porcelain. Dental Materials Journal. 2010; 29(4):381-391. PMid:20668358. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-119
26. Albrektsson T and Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004; 17(5):536-543. PMid:15543910.
27. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. Journal of Dental Research. 2004; 83(7):529-533. PMid:15218041. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1177/154405910408300704
28. An S-H, Matsumoto T, Miyajima H, Sasaki J-I, Narayanan R and Kim K-H. Surface characterization of alkali- and heat-treated Ti with or without prior acid etching. Applied Surface Science. 2012; 258(10):4377-4382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.119
29. Bathomarco RV, Solorzano G, Elias CN and Prioli R. Atomic force microscopy analysis of different surface treatments of Ti dental implant surfaces. Applied Surface Science. 2004; 233(1-4):29-34. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.apsusc.2004.04.007
30. Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J and Cooper LF. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model. Journal
31. Marinho V, Celletti R, Bracchetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C and Piattelli A. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2003; 18(1):75-81. PMid:12608672.
32. Perrin D, Szmukler-Moncler S, Echikou C, Pointaire P and Bernard JP. Bone response to alteration of surface topography and surface composition of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002; 13(5):465-469. PMid:12453122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002. 130504.x
33. Donachie Junior MJ. Titanium: A Technical Guide. 2nd ed. Materials Park: ASM International; 2000. p. 85-94.
34. Aronsson BO, Hjörvarsson B, Frauchiger L, Taborelli M, Vallotton PH and Descouts P. Hydrogen desorption from sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surfaces after glow-discharge treatment. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2001; 54(1):20-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:120:: AID-JBM33.0.CO;2-Z
35. Videm K, Lamolle S, Monjo M, Ellingsen JE, Lyngstadaas SP and Haugen HJ. Hydride formation on titanium surfaces by cathodic polarization. Applied Surface Science. 2008; 255(5):3011-3015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.090
36. Szmukler-Moncler S, Bischof M, Nedir R and Ermrich M. Titanium hydride and hydrogen concentration in acid-etched commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants: a comparative analysis of five implant systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2010; 21(9):944-950. PMid:20465551.
37. Castilho GAA, Martins MD and Macedo WAA. Surface characterization of titanium based dental implants. Brazilian Journal of Physics. 2006; 36(3b):1004-1008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-97332006000600055
38. Nam SH, Choi JW, Cho SJ, Kimt KS and Boo JH. Growth of TiO2 anti-reflection layer on textured Si (100) wafer substrate by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition method. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2011; 11(8):7315-7318. PMid:22103185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4813