Counterbalancing exploitative knowledge search during environmental dynamism: Reinforcing new ideas for existing products

Creativity and Innovation Management

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 420-434

  Lakemond, Nicolette ^a   Detterfelt, Jonas ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900310810     PISSN: 09631690     EISSN: 14678691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/caim.12038     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992) Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.
2. Argyris, C. (1993) Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
3. Arieli, D., Friedman, V.J. and Agbaria, K. (2009) The Paradox of Participation in Action Research. Action Research, 7, 263-290.
4. Audia, P.G. and Goncalo, J.A. (2007) Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry. Management Science, 53, 1-15.
5. Auh, S. and Menguc, B. (2005) Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: The Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1652-1661.
6. Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
7. Barney, J.B. (2001) Is the Resource-Based 'View' a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 41-56.
8. Bell, S. (1998) Self-Reflection and Vulnerability in Action Research: Bringing Forth New Worlds in Our Learning. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11, 179-191.
9. Benner, M.J. and Tushman, M.L. (2003) Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256.
10. Björk, J., Boccardelli, P. and Magnusson, M. (2010) Ideation Capabilities for Continuous Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 385-396.
11. Brockman, B.K. and Morgan, R.M. (2003) The Role of Existing Knowledge in New Product Innovativeness and Performance. Decision Sciences, 34, 385-419.
12. Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D. and Maguire, P. (2003) Why Action Research? Action Research, 1, 9-28.
13. Cassell, C. and Johnson, P. (2006) Action Research: Explaining the Diversity. Human Relations, 59, 783-814.
14. Cesaroni, F., Minin, A.D. and Piccaluga, A. (2005) Exploration and Exploitation Strategies in Industrial R&D. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 222-232.
15. Chen, M.-H. (2006) Understanding the Benefits and Detriments of Conflict on Team Creativity Process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 105-116.
16. Cheng, Y.-T. and van de Ven, A.H. (1996) Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos? Organization Science, 7, 593-614.
17. Coghlan, D. and Shani, A. (2005) Roles, Politics, and Ethics in Action Research Design. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18, 533-546.
18. Cooper, R. and Edgett, S. (2008) Ideation for Product Innovation: What are the Best Methods? PDMA Visions Magazine, March, 1-8.
19. Coughlan, P. and Coghlan, D. (2002) Action Research for Operations Management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22, 220-240.
20. de Visser, M., de Weerd-Nederhof, P., Faems, D., Song, M., van Looy, B. and Visscher, K. (2010) Structural Ambidexterity in NPD Processes: A Firm-Level Assessment of the Impact of Differentiated Structures on Innovation Performance. Technovation, 30, 291-299.
21. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007) Theory Buildning from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
22. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.
23. Gibson, C.B. and Birkinshaw, J. (2004) The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
24. Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C. and Ulrich, K.T. (2009) Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea. INSEAD Working Paper Series, INSEAD.
25. Gummesson, E. (2000) Qualitative Methods in Management, 2nd rev. edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G. and Shalley, C.E. (2006) The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693-706.
27. Gustavsen, B.R. (2003) New Forms of Knowledge Production and the Role of Action Research. Action Research, 1, 153-164.
28. He, Z.L. and Wong, P.K. (2004) Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494.
29. Jansen, J.J.P., van den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2006) Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661-1674.
30. Joyce, C.K., Jennings, K.E., Hey, J., Grossman, J.C. and Kalil, T. (2010) Getting Down to Business: Using Speedstorming to Initiate Creative Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 57-67.
31. Lakemond, N. and Berggren, C. (2006) Co-Locating NPD? The Need for Combining Project Focus and Organizational Integration. Technovation, 26, 807-819.
32. Lakemond, N., Lovén, E. and Detterfelt, J. (2010) Understanding Creativity Motors and Obstacles in Product Development. International Journal of Product Development, 11, 272-288.
33. Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967) Organisation and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
34. Leenders, R.T.A.J., Van Engelen, J.M.L. and Kratzer, J. (2007) Systematic Design Methods and the Creative Performance of New Product Teams: Do They Contradict or Complement Each Other? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 166-179.
35. Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W. and Schoenmakers, W. (2008) Exploration and Exploitation in Innovation: Reframing the Interpretation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 107-126.
36. Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Yan, L. and Veiga, J.F. (2006) Ambidexterity and Performance in Small- to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646-672.
37. March, J.G. (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
38. McFadzean, E. (1998a) The Creativity Continuum: Towards a Classification of Creative Problem Solving Techniques. Creativity and Innovation Management, 7, 131-139.
39. McFadzean, E. (1998b) Enhancing Creative Thinking within Organisations. Management Decision, 36, 309-315.
40. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
41. Nickerson, R.S. (1999) Enhancing Creativity. In Sternberg, R.J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 392-430.
42. O'Reilly III, C.A. and Tushman, M.L. (2004) The Ambidextrous Organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74-81.
43. Reid, S.E. and de Brentani, U. (2004) The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 170-184.
44. Rouse, M.J. and Daellenbach, U.S. (2002) More Thinking on Research Methods for the Resource-Based Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 963-967.
45. Smith, L., Bratini, L., Chambers, D.-A., Jensen, R.V. and Romero, L. (2010) Between Idealism and Reality: Meeting the Challenges of Participatory Action Research. Action Research, 8, 407-425.
46. Sørensen, J.B. and Stuart, T.E. (2000) Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 81-112.
47. Van de Ven, A.H. (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
48. Van de Ven, A.H. and Delbecq, A.L. (1974) The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes. The Academy of Management Journal, 17, 605-621.
49. Van de Ven, A.H. and Poole, M.S. (1995) Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 510-540.
50. Vissers, G. and Dankbaar, B. (2002) Creativity in Multidisciplinary New Product Development Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11, 31-42.
51. West, M.A. (2002) Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355-387.
52. Zahra, S.A. (1996) Technology Strategy and Financial Performance: Examining the Moderating Role of the Firm's Competitive Environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 189-219.