The establishment of B versus T cell identity

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 205-210

  Miyazaki, Kazuko ^a   Miyazaki, Masaki ^a   Murre, Cornelis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; HELA E BOX BINDING PROTEIN; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR E2A; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR EBF1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FKHR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PAX5; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

B LYMPHOCYTE; BINDING SITE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; ENHANCER REGION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PROMOTER REGION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T LYMPHOCYTE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ALLELE; ANIMAL; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; B-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOME; HUMANS; T-LYMPHOCYTES; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84899978161     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2014.02.009     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Weissman I.L. Stem cells: units of development, units of regeneration, and units in evolution. Cell 2000, 100:157-168.
2. + lympho-myeloid stem cells lacking erythro-megakaryocytic potential: a revised road map for adult blood lineage commitment. Cell 2005, 121:295-306.
3. Kondo M., et al. Identification of clonogenic common lymphoid lrogenitors in mouse bone marrow. Nat. Immunol. 1997, 91:661-672.
4. Wada H., et al. Adult T-cell progenitors retain myeloid potential. Nature 2008, 452:768-772.
5. Pronk C.J.H., et al. Elucidation of the phenotypic, functional, and molecular topography of a myeloerythroid progenitor cell hierarchy. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:428-442.
6. Lai A.Y., Kondo M. Asymmetrical lymphoid and myeloid lineage commitment in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203:1867-1873.
7. Cecchini M.G., et al. Role of colony stimulating factor-1 in the establishment and regulation of tissue macrophages during postnatal development of the mouse. Development 1994, 120:1357-1372.
8. DeKoter R.P., Singh H. Regulation of B lymphocyte and macrophage development by graded expression of PU.1. Science 2000, 288:1439-1441.
9. Laslo P., et al. Multilineage transcriptional priming and determination of alternate hematopoietic cell fates. Cell 2006, 126:755-766.
10. Inlay M.A., et al. Ly6d marks the earliest stage of B-cell specification and identifies the branchpoint between B-cell and T-cell development. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2376-2381.
11. Mansson R., et al. Single-cell analysis of the common lymphoid progenitor compartment reveals functional and molecular heterogeneity. Blood 2010, 115:2601-2609.
12. Bell J.J., Bhandoola A. The earliest thymic progenitors for T cells possess myeloid lineage potential. Nature 2008, 452:764-767.
13. Bain G., et al. E2A proteins are required for proper B cell development and initiation of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. Cell 1994, 79:885-892.
14. Zhuang Y., et al. The helix-loop-helix gene E2A is required for B cell formation. Cell 1994, 79:875-884.
15. Lin H.H., Grosschedl R. Failure of B-cell differentiation in mice lacking the transcription factor Ebf. Nature 1995, 376:263-267.
16. Nutt S.L., et al. Commitment to the B-lymphoid lineage depends on the transcription factor Pax5. Nature 1999, 401:556-562.
17. Beck K., et al. Distinct roles for E12 and E47 in B cell specification and the sequential rearrangement of immunoglobulin light chain loci. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 17:2271-2284.
18. Murre C. Developmental trajectories in early hematopoiesis. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2366-2370.
19. Welinder E., et al. The transcription factors E2A and HEB act in concert to induce the expression of FOXO1 in the common lymphoid progenitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:17402-17407.
20. Mansson R., et al. Positive intergenic feedback circuitry, involving EBF1 and FOXO1, orchestrates B-cell fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 108:17402-17407.
21. Nechanitzky R., et al. Transcription factor EBF1 is essential for the maintenance of B cell identity and prevention of alternative fates in committed cells. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14:868-876.
22. Mercer E.M., et al. Multilineage priming of enhancer repertoires precedes commitment to the B and myeloid cell lineages in hematopoietic progenitors. Immunity 2011, 35:413-425.
23. Medina K.L., et al. Assembling a gene regulatory network for specification of the B cell fate. Dev. Cell 2004, 7:607-617.
24. Ikawa T., et al. E proteins and Notch signaling cooperate to promote T cell lineage specification and commitment. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203:1329-1342.
25. Miyazaki M., et al. The opposing roles of the transcription factor E2A and its antagonist Id3 that orchestrate and enforce the naïve fate of T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12:992-1001.
26. Hatakeyama J., et al. Hes genes regulate size, shape and histogenesis of the nervous system by control of the timing of neural stem cell differentiation. Development 2004, 131:5539-5550.
27. De Obaldia M.E., et al. T cell development requires constraint of the myeloid regulator C/EBPα by the Notch target and transcriptional repressor Hes1. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 12:1277-1284.
28. Ting C.N., et al. Transcription factor GATA-3 is required for development of the T-cell lineage. Nature 1996, 384:474-478.
29. Weber B.N., et al. A critical role for TCF-1 in T-lineage specification and differentiation. Nature 2011, 476:63-68.
30. García-Ojeda M.E., et al. GATA-3 promotes T cell specification by repressing B cell potential in pro-T cells in mice. Blood 2013, 121:1749-1759.
31. Reizis B., Leder P. The upstream enhancer is necessary and sufficient for the expression of the pre-T cell receptor α gene is immature T lymphocyte. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194:979-990.
32. Reizis B., Leder P. Direct induction of T lymphocyte-specific gene expression by the mammalian Notch signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:295-300.
33. Kageyama R., et al. Roles of bHLH genes in neural stem cell differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 306:343-348.
34. Nellesen D.T., et al. Discrete enhancer elements mediate selective responsiveness of Enhancer of split complex genes to common transcriptional activators. Dev. Biol. 1999, 213:33-53.
35. Corbo J.C., et al. Suppressor of Hairless activates Brachyury expression in the Ciona embryo. Dev. Biol. 1998, 203:358-368.
36. Agata Y., et al. Regulation of T cell receptor β gene rearrangements and allelic exclusion by the helix-loop-helix protein, E47. Immunity 2007, 27:871-884.
37. Yashiro-Ohtani Y., et al. Pre-TCR signaling inactivates Notch1 transcription by antagonizing E2A. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:1665-1676.
38. Lucas J.L., et al. Transcription and recombination factories: common features?. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 2:318-324.
39. Lin Y.C., et al. Global changes in nuclear positioning of genes and intra- and inter-domain genomic interactions that orchestrate B cell fate. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 12:1196-1204.
40. Engel I., et al. Early thymocyte development is regulated by modulation of E2A protein activity. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194:733-745.
41. + lineage T cells. Immunity 2012, 36:348-361.
42. Lauritsen J.P., et al. Marked induction of the helix-loop-helix protein Id3 promotes the γδ T cell fate and renders their functional maturation Notch independent. Immunity 2009, 31:565-575.
43. Ueda-Hayakawa I., et al. Id3 restricts the developmental potential of gamma delta lineage during thymopoiesis. J. Immunol. 2007, 182:5306-5316.
44. Verykokakis M., et al. Inhibitor of DNA binding 3 limits development of murine slam-associated adpator protein-dependent 'innate' gd T cells. PLoS ONE 2010, 15:e9303.
45. D'Cruz L.M., et al. An essential role for the transcription factor HEB in thymocyte survival, Tcrα rearrangement and the development of natural killer T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 3:240-249.
46. Jones M.E., Zhuang Y. Acquisition of a functional TCR during T lymphocyte development is enforced by HEB and E2A transcription factors. Immunity 2007, 6:860-868.
47. Sedat J., Manuelidis L. A direct approach to the structure of eukaryotic chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1978, 42:331-350.
48. Paulson J.R., Laemmli U.K. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell 1977, 12:817-828.
49. Sachs R.K., et al. A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:2710-2714.
50. Münkel C., et al. Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285:1053-1065.
51. Bohn M., et al. Random loop model for long polymers. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 76:051805.
52. Jhunjhunwala S., et al. The 3D structure of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus: implications for long-range genomic interactions. Cell 2008, 133:265-279.
53. Guo C., et al. Two forms of loops generate the chromatin conformation of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus. Cell 2011, 147:332-343.
54. Guo C., et al. CTCF-binding elements mediate control of V(D)J recombination. Nature 2011, 477:424-430.
55. Lieberman-Aiden E., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293.
56. Fullwood M.J., et al. An estrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 2009, 462:58-64.
57. Sexton T., et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 2012, 148:458-472.
58. Dixon J.R., et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012, 485:376-380.
59. Li G., et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 2012, 148:84-98.
60. Kind J., van Steensel B. Genome-nuclear lamina interactions and gene regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22:320-325.
61. Oguro, et al. Poised lineage specification in multipotential hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by the polycomb protein, bmi. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6:279-286.
62. Semerad C.L., et al. E2A proteins maintain the hematopoietic stem cell pool and promote the maturation of myelolymphoid and myeloerythroid progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:1930-1935.
63. Clowney E.J., et al. Nuclear aggregation of olfactory receptor genes governs their monogenic expression. Cell 2012, 151:724-737.
64. Magklara A., Lomvardas S. Stochastic gene expression in mammals: lessons from olfaction. Trends Cell Biol. 2013, 23:449-456.