Teaching to the Test...or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 307-329

  Jensen, Jamie L ^a   McDaniel, Mark A ^b   Woodard, Steven M ^a   Kummer, Tyler A ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Biology; Bloom's taxonomy; Test expectancy; Testing effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899963389     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. AAAS. (2010). Vision and change: a call to action. Washington: AAAS.
2. Anderson, G. L., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Becker, H. S., Geer, B., & Hughes, E. C. (1968). Making the grade: The academic side of college life. New Brunswick: Transaction.
4. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to studying and learning. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
5. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444.
6. Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
7. Bybee, R. (1993). An instructional model for science education: Developing biological literacy. Colorado Springs: Biological Sciences Curriculum Studies.
8. Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2005). Biology, 7th ed. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
9. Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 279-283. doi: 10. 1177/0963721412452728.
10. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 268-276. doi: 10. 3758/Bf03193405.
11. Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2007). Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 474-478. doi: 10. 3758/Bf03194092.
12. Carpenter, S. K., Pashier, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 438-448. doi: 10. 3758/Mc. 36. 2. 438.
13. Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students' retention of US history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 760-771. doi: 10. 1002/Acp. 1507.
14. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 633-642. doi: 10. 3758/Bf03202713.
15. Chan, J. C. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). The testing effect in recognition memory: A dual process account. [Reports - Evaluative]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), 431-437.
16. Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 7, 368-381.
17. Dickie, L. O. (2003). Approach to learning, the cognitive demands of assessment, and achievement in physics. [Reports - Research]. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 33(1), 87-111.
18. Finley, J. R., & Benjamin, A. S. (2012). Adaptive and qualitative changes in encoding strategy with experience: Evidence from the test-expectancy paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(3), 632-652. doi: 10. 1037/A0026215.
19. Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 3(6), 710-711.
20. Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students' motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1. 1*). Research Evidence in Education Library (Vol. 1). London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
21. Hill, P. W., & Mcgaw, B. (1981). Testing the simplex assumption underlying Blooms Taxonomy. American Educational Research Journal, 18(1), 93-101. doi: 10. 3102/00028312018001093.
22. Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 621-629. doi: 10. 1037/A0015183.
23. Joughin, G. (2010). The hidden curriculum revisited: A critical review of research into the influence of summative assessment on learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 335-345.
24. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modulate the effect of testing on memory retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528-558.
25. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
26. Kropp, R. P., et al., & Florida State Univ. Tallahassee. Inst. of Human Learning. (1966). The construction and validation of tests of the cognitive processes as described in the "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives". (pp. 444).
27. Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 15(1), 11-24.
28. Lawson, A. E. (2002). Science teaching and development of thinking. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
29. Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R. B. C., & Falconer, K. A. (2000a). What kinds of scientific concepts exist? Concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 996-1018.
30. Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R., Clark, B. R., & Falconer, K. A. (2000b). What kinds of scientific concepts exist? Concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. [Reports - Research]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 996-1018.
31. Lawson, A. E., Clark, B., Cramer-Meldrum, E., Falconer, K. A., Sequist, J. M., & Kwon, Y.-J. (2000c). Development of scientific reasoning in college biology: Do two levels of general hypothesis-testing skills exist? [Reports - Research]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 81-101.
32. Madaus, G. F. (1973). A causal model analysis of Bloom's Taxonomy. American Educational Research Journal, 10(4), 253-262.
33. Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. 10(4), 253-262.
34. McDaniel, M. A., & Donnelly, C. M. (1996). Learning with analogy and elaborative interrogation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 508-519. doi: 10. 1037//0022-0663. 88. 3. 508.
35. McDaniel, M. A., Blischak, D. M., & Challis, B. (1994). The effects of test expectancy on processing and memory of prose. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 230-248.
36. McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 494-513. doi: 10. 1080/09541440701326154.
37. McDaniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2012). Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 18-26.
38. McDaniel, M. A., Friedman, A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1978). Remembering the levels of information in words. Memory & Cognition, 6, 156-164.
39. McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R. C., Agarwal, P. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2013). Quizzing in middle school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 360-372.
40. McDermott, K. B., Agarwal, P. K., D'Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDaniel, M. A. (in press). Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.
41. Miller, C. M. L., & Parlett, M. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
42. Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., Wyse, S. A., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills. [Reports - Evaluative]. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 435-440.
43. Momsen, J. L., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Montplaisir, L., Anderson, E., & Grosz, N. (2013). Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 12, 239-249.
44. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy.
45. Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.
46. Roediger, H. L., III, Agarwal, P. K., McDaniel, M. A., & McDermott, K. B. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 382-395.
47. Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., & Sholar, B. (2010). Tests enhance the transfer of learning. [Reports - Research]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 233-239.
48. Seddon, G. M. (1978). The Properties of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain. Review of Educational Research, r.
49. Snyder, G. (1951). The hidden curriculum. New York: Knopf.
50. Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Zhang, L. (2008). Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 486-506.
51. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students' perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325-341.
52. Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffing, T. D. (2011). Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 264-273.
53. Thomas, A. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 668-678. doi: 10. 3758/Bf03193305.
54. van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D. M., & Liem, A. D. (2008). College senior's theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 812-828.
55. Wiggins, G., McTighe, J., & Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Alexandria VA. (1998). Understanding by Design. (pp. 214): Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1703 North Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 (stock number 198199, members:.
56. Zawicki, P., & Witas, H. W. (2007). HIV-1 protecting CCR5-D32 allele in medieval Poland. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 8(2): 146-151.
57. Zoller, U. (1993). Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: unlikely for HOCS (SYM). Journal of Chemical Education 70: 195-197.